The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 551-564

  Cronin, Blaise ^a   Meho, Lokman I ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; DATA STRUCTURES; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION;

ACADEMIC DOMAINS; INTELLECTUAL TRADE; SHIFTING BALANCE;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 39749202962     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20764     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Arhonditsis, G.B., Adams‐VanHaren, B.A., Nielsen, L., Stow, C.A., & Reckhow, K.H. (2006). Evaluation of the current state of mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical modeling: Citation analysis and future perspectives. Environmental Science & Technology, 40 (21), 6547–6554.
2. Bates, M.J. (1996). Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students. Library Trends, 45, 155–164.
3. Bedeian, A.G. (2005). Crossing disciplinary boundaries: A epilegomenon for Lockett and McWilliams. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14 (2), 151–155.
4. Borgman, C.L., & Rice, R.E. (1992). The convergence of information science and communication: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43 (6), 397–411.
5. Bowker, G.C. (2005). Memory practices in the sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Buttlar, L.J. (1999). Information sources in library and information science doctoral research. Library & Information Science Research, 21 (2), 227–245.
7. Cronin, B. (2002). Holding the center while prospecting at the periphery: Domain identity and coherence in North American information studies education. Education for Information, 20, 1–8.
8. Cronin, B., & Pearson, S. (1990). The export of ideas from information science. Journal of Information Science, 16, 381–391.
9. Ellis, D., Allen, D., & Wilson, T. (1999). Information science and information systems: Conjunct subjects disjunct disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 1095–1107.
10. Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R.I. (2005). Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self‐fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30, 8–24.
11. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: Wiley.
12. Goldstone, R.L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The import and export of cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 30, 983–993.
13. Grover, V., Ayyagari, R., Gokhale, R., Lim, J., & Coffey, J. (2006). A citation analysis of the evolution and state of information systems within a constellation of reference disciplines. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7, 270–325.
14. Harnad, S. (2007, June). Open access scientometrics and the UK Research Assessment Exercise. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 11th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Madrid, Spain.. Retrieved, July 2, 2007, from http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/13804/
15. Kärki, R. (1996). Searching for bridges between disciplines: an author co‐citation analysis on the research into scholarly communication. Journal of Information Science, 22, 323–334.
16. Keen, P.G.W. (1980). MIS research: Reference disciplines and a cumulative tradition. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Information Systems, Philadelphia, PA, December 8–10, 1980.
17. Liu, Z., & Wang, C.Z. (2005). Mapping interdisciplinarity in demography: A journal network analysis. Journal of Information Science, 31, 308–316.
18. Lockett, A., & McWilliams, A. (2005). The balance of trade between disciplines. Do we effectively manage knowledge? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 139–150.
19. McKechnie, L.E.F., Goodall, G.R., Lajoie‐Paquette, D., & Julien, H. (2005). How human information behaviour researchers use each other's work: A basic citation analysis study. Information Research. Retrieved, July 2, 2007, from http://informationr.net/ir/10‐2/paper220.html
20. Menand, L. (2005). Dangers within and without. Profession, 10–17.
21. Meyer, T. (1996). A citation analysis study of library science: Who cites librarians? College & Research Libraries, 57, 23–33.
22. Miyamoto, S., Midorikawa, N., & Nakayama, K. (1990). A view on studies on bibliometrics and related studies in Japan. In C.L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (pp. 73–83). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23. Mote, L.J.B. (1962). Reasons for the variation of information needs of scientists. Journal of Documentation, 18, 169–175.
24. Nisonger, T.E., & Davis, C.H. (2005). The perception of library and information science journals by LIS education deans and ARL library directors: A replication of the Kohl‐Davis study. College & Research Libraries, 66, 341–377.
25. Peritz, B.C., & Bar‐Ilan, J. (2002). The sources used by bibliometrics–scientometrics as reflected in references. Scientometrics, 54, 269–284.
26. Rice, R.E., Borgman, C.L., & Reeves, B. (1988). Citation networks of communication journals, 1977–1985: Cliques and positions, citations made and citations received. Human Communication Research, 15, 256–283.
27. Salton, G., & McGill, M.J. (1983). Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw‐Hill.
28. Stegmann, J., & Grohmann, G. (2001). Citation rates, knowledge export and international visibility of dermatology journals listed and not listed in the Journal Citation Reports, Scientometrics, 50 (3), 483–502.
29. Swanson, D.R. (1986). Fish oil, Raynaud's syndrome and undiscovered public knowledge. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 30, 7–18.
30. Talja, S. (2005). The domain analytic approach to scholars' information practices. In K.E. Fisher, S. Erdelez, & E.F. McKechnie (Eds.), Theories of information behavior (pp. 123–127). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
31. Tang, R. (2004). Evolution of the interdisciplinary characteristics of information and library science. In Linda Schamber and Carol L. Barry (Eds.), Proceedings of the 67th ASIS&T Annual Meeting (pp. 54–63). Silver Spring, MD: American Society for Information Science and Technology.
32. Urata, H. (1990). Information flows among academic disciplines in Japan. Scientometrics, 18, 309–319.
33. White, H.D. (2004). Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics, 25, 89–116.