The dynamics of interactive information retrieval, part II: An empirical study from the activity theory perspective

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 58, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 987-998

  Xu, Yunjie ^a   Liu, Chengliang ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; QUERY PROCESSING; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

COGNITIVE ACTIVITY; INTERACTIVE INFORMATION RETRIEVAL (IIR);

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 34249717789     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20574     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bates, M.J. (1990). Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? Information Processing & Management, 26(5), 575-591.
2. Borlund, P. (2003). The IIR evaluation model: A framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Information Research, 8(3), 1-16.
3. Efthimiadis, E.N. (2000). Interactive query expansion: A user-based evaluation in relevance feedback environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(11), 989-1003.
4. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
5. Fitzgerald, M.A., & Galloway, C. (2001). Relevance judging, evaluation, and decision making in virtual library: Adescriptive study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(12), 989-1010.
6. Harter, S.P. (1992). Psychological relevance and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9), 602-615.
7. Hiemstra, D. (1998, September). A linguistically motivated probabilistic model of information retrieval. Paper presented at the European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL), Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
8. Ingwersen, P. (1992). Information retrieval interaction. London: Taylor Graham Publishing.
9. Ingwersen, P. (1996). Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: Elements of a cognitive IR theory. Journal of Documentation, 52(1), 3-50.
10. Kekäläinen, J., & Järvelin, K. (2002). Using graded relevance assessments in IR evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(13), 1120-1129.
11. Kirk, R.E. (1995). Experiment design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
12. Kuhlthau, C. (1993). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
13. Leont'ev, A.N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14. Lin, S.J., & Belkin, N.J. (2005). Validation of a model of information seeking over multiple search sessions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(4), 393-415.
15. Ponte, J.M., & Croft, W.B. (1998). A language modeling approach to information retrieval. In ACM SIGIR Conference on Information Retrieval (pp. 275-281). New York: ACM Press.
16. Tang, R., Shaw Jr., W.M., & Vevea, J.L. (1999). Towards the identification of the optimal number of relevance categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 254-264.
17. Vakkari, P. (2001). A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: A summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study. Journal of Documentation, 57(1), 44-60.
18. Vakkari, P., Pennanen, M., & Serola, S. (2003). Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal: A longitudinal case study. Information Processing & Management, 39, 445-463.
19. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Xie, H. (2000). Shifts of interactive intentions and information-seeking strategies in interactive information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(9), 841-857.
21. Xu, Y. (2007). The dynamics of interactive information retrieval behavior, Part I: An activity theory perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 958-970.
22. Xu, Y., & Chen, Z. (2006). Relevance judgment - What do information consumers consider beyond topicality? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(7), 961-973.