What we know now: The evanston Illinois field lineups

Law and Human Behavior

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-12

  Steblay, Nancy K ^a  

^a AUGSBURG COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Eyewitness; Field study; Lineups

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CRIMINAL LAW; DECISION MAKING; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RECOGNITION; UNITED STATES; VICTIM; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CRIME VICTIMS; CRIMINAL LAW; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLINOIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79952361942     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10979-009-9207-7     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. BW Behrman SL Davey 2001 Eyewitness identification in actual criminal cases: An archival analysis Law and Human Behavior 25 475 491 10.1023/A:1012840831846 11688369 (Pubitemid 33743583)
2. JC Brigham CA Meissner AW Wasserman 1999 Applied issues in the construction and expert assessment of photo lineups Applied Cognitive Psychology 13 S73 S92 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199911)13:1+3.3.CO;2- W
3. JC Brigham DJ Ready SA Spier 1990 Standards for evaluating the fairness of photographic Lineups Basic and Applied Social Psychology 11 149 163 10.1207/s15324834basp1102-3
4. E Brown K Deffenbacher W Sturgill 1977 Memory for faces and the circumstances of encounter Journal of Applied Psychology 62 3 311 318 10.1037/0021-9010.62.3.311 (Pubitemid 8278130)
5. Capital Punishment Reform Study Committee Act, 2003, Ill. Ill. Comp.Stat. Ann. 725 5/107A-10 (West 2006).
6. SE Clark TE Marshall R Rosenthal 2009 Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 15 63 75 10.1037/a0015185 19309217
7. BL Cutler MB Kovera 2008 Introduction to commentaries on the Illinois Pilot Study of Lineup Reform Law and Human Behavior 32 1 2 10.1007/s10979-007- 9120-x 18080734
8. KA Deffenbacher BH Bornstein SD Penrod 2006 Mugshot exposure effects: Retroactive interference, mugshot commitment, source confusion, and unconscious transference Law and Human Behavior 30 287 307 10.1007/s10979-006-9008-1 16741635 (Pubitemid 44264924)
9. AN Doob HM Kirshenbaum 1973 Bias in police lineups-Partial remembering Journal of Police Science and Adminstration 18 287 293
10. AB Douglass N Steblay 2006 Memory distortion in eyewitnesses: A meta-analysis of the post-identification feedback effect Applied Cognitive Psychology 20 859 869 10.1002/acp.1237 (Pubitemid 44755910)
11. JE Dysart RCL Lindsay R Hammond P Dupuis 2001 Mug shot exposure prior to lineup identification: Interference, transference, and commitment effects Journal of Applied Psychology 86 6 1280 1284 10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1280 11768068 (Pubitemid 33405431)
12. KA Findley MS Scott 2006 The multiple dimensions of tunnel vision in criminal cases Wisconsin Law Review 2 291 397
13. SM Greathouse MB Kovera 2009 Instruction bias and lineup presentation moderate the effects of administrator knowledge on eyewitness identification Law and Human Behavior 33 70 82 10.1007/s10979-008-9136-x 18594956
14. LE Hasel SM Kassin 2009 On the presumption of evidentiary independence: Can confessions corrupt eyewitness identifications? Psychological Science 21 122 126 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02262.x
15. Kings County Supreme Court. (2008). Defendant's request to modify double-blind simultaneous lineup to sequential one denied. Matter of Derrick Walthour. New York Law Journal, 239, 30, col. 3, March 14.
16. A Klobuchar N Steblay HL Caligiuri 2006 Symposium: reforming eyewitness identification: Convicting the guilty, protecting the innocent: Improving eyewitness identifications: Hennepin County's blind sequential pilot project Cardozo Public Law, Policy, & Ethics Journal 4 381 413
17. RCL Lindsay GL Wells 1985 Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential presentation Journal of Applied Psychology 70 556 561 10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.556
18. RS Malpass 1981 Effective size and defendant bias in eyewitness identification lineups Law and Human Behavior 5 4 299 309 10.1007/BF01044945 (Pubitemid 12138892)
19. RS Malpass RCL Lindsay 1999 Measuring lineup fairness Applied Cognitive Psychology 13 1 7 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199911)13:1+3.0. CO;2-9
20. Malpass, R. S., Tredoux, C. G., & McQuiston-Surrett, D. (2007). Lineup construction and lineup fairness. In R. C. L. Lindsay, D. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology (Vol. 2): Memory for people (pp. 155-178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
21. Malpass, R. S., Zimmerman, L. A., Ross, S. J., Topp, L. D, Uribe, V., De Leon, D., Belisle, J. (2006a, March). Illinois Lineup Evaluation Project Protocol and Code Book. Appendix 16 in Mecklenburg, S. H. (2006, March). Report to the legislature of the State of Illinois: The Illinois Pilot Program on sequential double-blind identification procedures. Springfield, IL: Illinois State Police.
22. Malpass, R. S., Zimmerman, L. A., Ross, S. J., Topp, L. D., Uribe, V., De Leon, D., Belisle, J. (2006b, March). Results of the Illinois Lineup Project. Appendix 17 in Mecklenburg, S. H. (2006, March). Report to the legislature of the State of Illinois: The Illinois Pilot Program on sequential double-blind identification procedures. Springfield, IL: Illinois State Police.
23. Mecklenburg, S. H. (2006a). Report to the legislature of the State of Illinois: The Illinois pilot program on double-blind, sequential lineup procedures. Springfield, IL: Illinois State Police.
24. Mecklenburg, S. H. (2006b). Addendum to the report to the legislature of the state of Illinois: The Illinois Pilot Program on sequential double-blind identification procedures. June 19, 2006, p. 9.
25. SH Mecklenburg PJ Bailey MR Larson 2008 The Illinois field study: A significant contribution to understanding real world eyewitness identification issues Law and Human Behavior 32 22 27 10.1007/s10979-007-9108-6 17674168
26. SH Mecklenburg PJ Bailey MR Larson 2008 Eyewitness identification: What chiefs need to know now The Police Chief 75 10 68 81
27. National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. (2007). Complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief. In the Circuit Court of Cook County Chancery Department, County Division, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, plaintiff, v. Superintendent of the Chicago Police Department, Chief of the Evanston Police Department, Chief of the Joliet Police Department, and Director of the Illinois State Police NO. 07 CH 3622.
28. People v. Holiday, 47 Ill.2d 300, 307, 265 N.E2d 634, 637 (1970).
29. SJ Ross RS Malpass 2008 Moving forward: Response to "Studying eyewitness investigations in the field" Law and Human Behavior 32 16 21 10.1007/s10979-007-9104-x 17690957
30. DL Schacter R Dawes LL Jacoby D Kahneman R Lempert HL Roediger R Rosenthal 2008 Policy forum: Studying eyewitness investigations in the field Law and Human Behavior 32 3 5 10.1007/s10979-007-9093-9 17610149
31. Steblay, N. (2006). Observations on the Illinois Lineup Data. Retrieved from http://www.augsburg.edu/psychology/steblay.html.
32. Steblay, N. (2007a). Affidavit of Nancy Steblay. In the Circuit Court of Cook County Chancery Department, County Division, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, plaintiff, v. Superintendent of the Chicago Police Department, Chief of the Evanston Police Department, and Director of the Illinois State Police, Defendants, No. 07 CH 03622, September 24.
33. Steblay, N. K. (2007b). Double-blind sequential police lineup procedures: Toward an integrated laboratory and field practice perspective. Final report to the National Institute of Justice, Grant #2004-IJ CX-0044. Retrieved from http://www.augsburg.edu/psychology/steblay.html.
34. NK Steblay 2008 Commentary on "Studying eyewitness investigations in the field": A look forward Law and Human Behavior 32 11 15 10.1007/s10979-007-9105-9 17641959
35. Steblay, N., & Benson, S. (2009). Multiple identification attempts with simultaneous and sequential lineups. Paper presented at American Psychology-Law Society Conference. San Antonia, TX.
36. N Steblay J Dysart S Fulero RCL Lindsay 2001 Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison Law and Human Behavior 25 459 473 10.1023/A:1012888715007 11688368 (Pubitemid 33743582)
37. Steblay, N. K., & Tix, R. (2007). Multiple identification attempts with simultaneous lineups. Paper presented at John Jay College of Criminal Justice Conference, Off the witness stand: Using psychology in the practice of justice. New York City.
38. Tollestrup, P. A., Turtle, J. W., & Yuille, J. C. (1994). Actual victims and witnesses to robbery and fraud: An archival analysis. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39. CG Tredoux 1998 Statistical inference on measures of lineup fairness Law and Human Behavior 22 2 217 237 10.1023/A:1025746220886 (Pubitemid 28178219)
40. Wells, G. L. (1988). Eyewitness identification: A system handbook. Toronto: Carswell Legal Publications.
41. Wells, G. L. (2006a). Eyewitness identification: Systemic reforms. Wisconsin Law Review, 2, 615-643. (Pubitemid 44257788)
42. Wells, G. L. (2006b). Gary L. Wells comments on the Mecklenburg report. Retrieved from http://www.psychology.iastate.edu/faculty/gwells/Illinois- Project-Wellscomments.pdf.
43. GL Wells 2008 Field experiments on eyewitness identification: Towards a better understanding of pitfalls and prospects Law and Human Behavior 32 6 10 10.1007/s10979-007-9098-4 17610051
44. GL Wells AL Bradfield 1998 "Good, you identified the suspect": Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience Journal of Applied Psychology 83 3 360 376 10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.360
45. GL Wells AL Bradfield 1999 Measuring the goodness of lineups: Parameter estimation, question effects, and limits to the mock witness procedure Applied Cognitive Psychology 13 27 39 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199911)13:1+3.3.CO;2-D
46. GL Wells CAE Luus P Windschitl 1994 Maximizing the utility of eyewitness identification evidence Current Directions in Psychological Science 3 6 194 197 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770833
47. GL Wells A Memon SD Penrod 2006 Eyewitness evidence: Improving its probative value Psychological Science in the Public Interest 7 2 45 75
48. GL Wells E Olson 2002 Eyewitness identification: Information gain from incriminating and exonerating behaviors Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 8 155 167 10.1037/1076-898X.8.3.155 12240928
49. GL Wells DS Quinlivan 2009 Suggestive eyewitness identification procedures and the Supreme Court's reliability test in light of eyewitness science: 30 Years later Law and Human Behavior 33 1 24 10.1007/s10979-008-9130-3 18302010
50. DB Wright AT McDaid 1996 Comparing system and estimator variables using data from real lineups Applied Cognitive Psychology 10 75 84 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199602)10:1<75::AID-ACP364>3.0.CO;2-E (Pubitemid 126482454)