Lineup construction and lineup fairness

The Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology: Volume II: Memory for People

Volumn 2, Issue , 2007, Pages 155-178

  Malpass, Roy S ^a   Tredoux, Colin G ^b   McQuiston Surrett, Dawn ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85075663538     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203936368-13     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Brigham, J. C., & Brandt, C. C. (1992). Measuring lineup fairness: Mock witness responses versus direct evaluations of lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 16(5), 475-489.
2. Brigham, J. C., & Pfeifer, J. E. (1994). Evaluating the fairness of lineups. Adult Eyewitness Testimony: Current Trends & Developments (pp. 201-222). Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
3. Corey, D., Malpass, R. S., & McQuiston, D. E. (1999). Parallelism in eyewitness and mock witness identifications. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, S41-S58.
4. Devlin, Hon. Lord Patrick. (1976). Report to the Secretary of State for the Home Department of the Departmental Committee on Evidence of Identification in Criminal Cases. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
5. Doob, A. N., & Kirshenbaum, H. M. (1973). Bias in police lineups-Partial remembering. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 18, 287-293.
6. Ellison, K. W., & Buckhout, R. (1981). Psychology and criminal justice. New York: Harper & Row.
7. Laughery, K. R., Jensen, D. G., & Wogalter, M. S. (1988). Response bias with prototypic faces. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (pp. 157-162). Chichester: Wiley.
8. Lindsay, R. C., Lea, J. A., & Fulford, J. A. (1991). Sequential lineup presentation: Technique matters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 741-745.
9. Lindsay, R. C. L., Smith, S. M., & Pryke, S. (1999). Measures of lineup fairness: Do they postdict identification accuracy? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, S93-S107.
10. Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (1980). What price justice? Exploring the relationship of lineup fairness to identification accuracy. Law & Human Behavior, 4, 303-313.
11. Luus, C. A. E., & Wells, G. L. (1991). Eyewitness identification and the selection of distractors for lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 43-57
12. Malpass, R. S. (1981). Effective Size and defendant bias in eyewitness identification lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 5(4), 299-309.
13. Malpass, R. S. (2004). A lineup evaluation “do-it-yourself kit” for attorneys and law enforcement. Retrieved from http://eyewitness.utep.edu/diy.html
14. Malpass, R. S., & Devine, P. G. (1983). Measuring the fairness of eyewitness identification in lineups. In S. Lloyd-Bostock & B. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating eyewitness evidence (pp. 81-102). London: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Marwitz, D. B., & Wogalter, M. S. (1998). Bias in photo-spreads of faces: A comparison of two lineup construction methods. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the Human Factors Society, Santa Monica.
16. McQuiston, D. E., & Malpass, R. S. (2002). Validity of the mock witness paradigm: Testing the assumptions. Law and Human Behavior, 26(4), 439-453.
17. Pelwani v. S., 1963 (2) (PH) H237 (T).
18. Scheck, B., Neufeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2001). Actual innocence: When justice goes wrong and how to make it right. New York: Doubleday.
19. Shepherd, J. W., & Ellis, H. (1996). Face recall-Methods and problems. In S. L. Sporer, R. S. Malpass, & G. Kohnken (Eds.), Psychological issues in eyewitness identification (pp. 87-115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Smith, S. M., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Pryke, S. (2000). Postdictors of eyewitness errors: Can false identifications be diagnosed? Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 542-550.
21. Technical Working Group on Eyewitness Evidence. (1999). Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement (pp. i-x, 1-44). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/pubs-sum/178240.htm
22. Topp, L. D., McQuiston, D. E., & Malpass, R. S. (2003, July). Exploring composite production and its subsequent effects on eyewitness memory. Poster presented at the Meetings of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Aberdeen, Scotland.
23. Tredoux, C. G. (1998). Statistical inference on measures of lineup fairness. Law and Human Behavior, 22(2), 217-237.
24. Tredoux, C. G. (1999). Statistical considerations when determining measures of lineup size and lineup bias. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, S9-S26.
25. Tredoux, C. G. (2002). A direct measure of facial similarity and its relation to human similarity perceptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(3), 180-193.
26. Tredoux, C. G., Parker, J. F., & Nunez, D. (2004). Optimality of encoding and process/outcome parallelism in eyewitness and mock witness identifications. Unpublished manuscript, University of Cape Town.
27. Wells, G. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification? American Psychologist, 48(5), 553-571.
28. Wells, G. L., & Bradfield, A. L. (1999). Measuring the goodness of lineups: Parameter estimation, question effects, and limits to the mock witness paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, S27-S39.
29. Wells, G. L., Leippe, M. R., & Ostrom, T. M. (1979). Guidelines for empirically assessing the fairness of a lineup. Law and Human Behavior, 3(4), 285-293.
30. Wells, G. L., Rydell, S. M., & Seelau, E. P. (1993). On the selection of distracters for eyewitness lineups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 835-844.
31. Wells, G. L., Seelau, E. P., Rydell, S. M., & Luus, C. A. E. (1994). Recommendations for properly conducted lineup identification tasks. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 223-244). New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Wogalter, M. S., & Jensen, D. G. (1986). Response bias in lineups with prototypic faces. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting (pp. 725-728). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
33. Wogalter, M. S., Malpass, R. S., & McQuiston, D. E. (2004). A national survey of U.S. police on preparation and conduct of identification lineups. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 10(1), 69-82.
34. Wogalter, M. S., Marwitz, D. B., & Leonard, D. C. (1992). Suggestiveness in photospread lineups: Similarity induces distinctiveness. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6(5), 443-453.