On the presumption of evidentiary independence: Can confessions corrupt eyewitness identifications?

Psychological Science

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 122-126

  Hasel, Lisa E ^a   Kassin, Saul M ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CRIMINAL LAW; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GUILT; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECALL; RECOGNITION; STUDENT; SUGGESTION; THEFT;

ADULT; CRIMINAL LAW; CULTURE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GUILT; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); STUDENTS; SUGGESTION; THEFT; TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 57649200388     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02262.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Douglass, A.B. Steblay, N. (2006). Memory distortion in eyewitnesses: A meta-analysis of the post-identification feedback effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 859 869.
2. Drizin, S.A. Leo, R.A. (2004). The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review, 82, 891 1007.
3. Dror, I.E. Charlton, D. (2006). Why experts make errors. Journal of Forensic Identification, 56, 600 616.
4. Innocence Project 2008a). Understand the causes: False confessions. Retrieved November 2, 2008, from
5. Innocence Project 2008b). Know the cases: Barry Laughman. Retrieved November 2, 2008, from
6. Kassin, S.M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60, 215 228.
7. Kassin, S.M. Gudjonsson, G.H. (2004). The psychology of confession evidence: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 35 69.
8. Kassin, S.M. Kiechel, K.L. (1996). The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science, 7, 125 128.
9. Kassin, S.M. Neumann, K. (1997). On the power of confession evidence: An experimental test of the "fundamental difference" hypothesis. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 469 484.
10. Kassin, S.M. Sukel, H. (1997). Coerced confessions and the jury: An experimental test of the "harmless error" rule. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 27 46.
11. Michael Evans v. City of Chicago, et al., Case No. 04-cv-3570, Docket No. 219 (N.D. Ill., 2006).
12. Neuschatz, J.S., Lawson, D.S., Swanner, J.K., Meissner, C.A. Neuschatz, J.S. (2008). The effects of accomplice witnesses and jailhouse informants on jury decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 137 149.
13. Nickerson, R.S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175 220.
14. Risinger, D.M., Saks, M.J., Thompson, W.C. Rosenthal, R. (2002). The Daubert/Kumho implications of observer effects in forensic science: Hidden problems of expectation and suggestion. California Law Review, 90, 1 56.
15. Russano, M.B., Meissner, C.A., Narchet, F.M. Kassin, S.M. (2005). Investigating true and false confessions within a novel experimental paradigm. Psychological Science, 16, 481 486.
16. Simon, D., Snow, C.J. Read, S.J. (2004). The redux of cognitive consistency theories: Evidence judgments by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 814 837.
17. Wells, G.L. Bradfield, A.L. (1998). "Good, you identified the suspect": Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 360 376.
18. Wells, G.L., Memon, A. Penrod, S.D. (2006). Eyewitness evidence: Improving its probative value. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 45 75.
19. Wright, D.B. Skagerberg, E.M. (2007). Postidentification feedback affects real eyewitnesses. Psychological Science, 18, 172 178.