Lineup Administrator Influences on Eyewitness Identification Decisions

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 63-75

  Clark, Steven E ^a   Marshall, Tanya E ^a   Rosenthal, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

decision; eyewitness identification; memory; social influence

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; RECALL; RECOGNITION;

ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 65349129024     PISSN: 1076898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0015185     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. American Bar Association. Resolution adopted by the House of Delegates, August, 4, 2004 (2004), Author, Washington, DC
2. Brand C.R., and Egan V. The "Big Five" dimensions of personality? Evidence from ipsative, adjectival self-attributions. Personality & Individual Differences 10 (1989) 1165-1171
3. Calandra D., and Carey J.E. 2005 field guide for the California Peace Officers Legal Sourcebook (2005), California District Attorneys Association, Sacramento
4. Charman S.D., and Wells G.L. Eyewitness lineups: Is the appearance-change instruction a good idea?. Law and Human Behavior 31 (2007) 3-22
5. Clark H.H. Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology 11 (1979) 430-477
6. Clark S.E. A memory and decision model for eyewitness identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology 17 (2003) 629-654
7. Clark S.E. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior 29 (2005) 395-424
8. Clark S.E., and Godfrey R.D. Eyewitness identification evidence and innocence risk. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 16 (2009) 22-42
9. Clark S.E., Howell R.T., and Davey S.L. Regularities in eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior 32 (2008) 187-213
10. Cocilova, S. (2000). The effects of non-similar foils on eyewitness confidence and accuracy. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Riverside.
11. Cutler B.L., and Penrod S.D. Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology 73 (1988) 281-290
12. Cutler B.L., Penrod S.D., and Martens T.K. The reliability of eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior 11 (1987) 233-258
13. Fleet M.L., Brigham J.C., and Bothwell R.K. The confidence-accuracy relationship: The effects of confidence assessment and choosing. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 17 (1987) 171-187
14. Foster R.A., Libukman T.M., Schooler J.W., and Loftus E.F. Consequentiality and eyewitness person identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology 8 (1994) 107-124
15. Grice H.P. Logic and conversation. In: Cole P., and Morgan J.L. (Eds). Syntax and semantics 3 (1975), Academic, New York 41-58
16. Gross S.R., Jacoby K., Matheson D.J., Montgomery N., and Patil S. Exonerations in the United States 1989 through 2003. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 95 (2005) 523-560
17. Haw R.M., and Fisher R.P. Effects of administrator-witness contact on eyewitness identification accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (2004) 1106-1112
18. Huff C.R., Rattner A., and Sagarin E. Convicted but innocent (1996), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
19. Loftus E.F., and Ketcham K. Witness for the defense: The accused, the eyewitness, and the expert who puts memory on trial (1991), St. Martin's, New York
20. Malpass R.S., and Devine P.G. Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender. Journal of Applied Psychology 56 (1981) 482-489
21. O'Rourke T.E., Penrod S.D., Cutler B.L., and Stuve T.E. The external validity of eyewitness identification research: Generalizing across subject populations. Law and Human Behavior 13 (1989) 385-395
22. Overall J.E. Continuity correction for Fisher's exact probability test. Journal of Educational Statistics 5 (1980) 177-190
23. Phillips M.R., McAuliff B.D., Kovera M.B., and Cutler B.L. Double-blind photoarray administration as a safeguard against investigation bias. Journal of Applied Psychology 84 (1999) 940-951
24. Pryke S., Lindsay R.C.L., Dysart J.E., and Dupuis P. Multiple independent identification decisions: A method of calibrating eyewitness identifications. Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (2004) 73-84
25. Rosenthal R. Covert communication in the psychological experiment. Psychological Bulletin 67 (1967) 356-367
26. Rosenthal R. Experimenter effects in behavioral research. Expanded ed. (1976), Irvington, New York
27. Rosenthal R. Meta-analytic procedures for social research (1991), Sage, Newbury Park
28. Rosenthal R. Covert communication in classrooms, clinics, courtrooms, and cubicles. American Psychologist 57 (2002) 839-849
29. Rosenthal R., and Fode K.L. Psychology of the scientist: 5. Three experiments in experimenter bias. Psychological Reports 12 (1963) 491-511
30. Rosnow R.L., Rosenthal R., and Rubin D.B. Contrasts and correlations in effect-size estimation. Psychological Science 11 (2000) 446-453
31. Scheck B., Neufeld P., and Dwyer J. Actual innocence: Five days to execution and other dispatches from the wrongly convicted (2000), Doubleday, New York
32. Shapiro P.N., and Penrod S.D. Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin 100 (1986) 139-156
33. Snedecor G.W., and Cochran W.G. Statistical methods. 6th ed. (1967), Iowa State University Press, Ames
34. Sporer S.L. Post-dicting eyewitness accuracy: Confidence, decision-times and person descriptions of choosers and non-choosers. European Journal of Social Psychology 74 (1992) 157-180
35. Sporer S.L. Eyewitness identification accuracy, confidence, and decision times in simultaneous and sequential lineups. Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (1993) 22-33
36. State of Connecticut v. Laquan Ledbetter, 275 Conn. 534 (2005).
37. State of Utah v. Anthony L. Long, 721 P. 2d. 483 (1986).
38. Steblay N.M. Social influence in eyewitness recall: A meta-analytic review of lineup instruction effects. Law and Human Behavior 21 (1997) 283-297
39. Tunnicliff J.L., and Clark S.E. Selecting foils for identification lineups: Matching suspects or descriptions?. Law and Human Behavior 24 (2000) 231-258
40. Tversky A. Features of similarity. Psychological Review 84 (1977) 327-352
41. U.S. v. Melvin Telfaire 152 U.S. App. D.C. 146; 469 F.2d 552 (1972).
42. Wells G.L. The psychology of lineup identifications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 14 (1984) 89-103
43. Wells G.L., Small M., Penrod S., Malpass R.S., Fulero S.M., and Brimacombe C.E. Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior 22 (1998) 603-647