Balancing incompatible endoprosthetic design goals: A combined ingrowth and bone remodeling simulation

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 374-380

  Tarala, M ^a   Janssen, D ^a   Verdonschot, N ^a,b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bone remodeling; Cementless implant; Ingrowth; Micromotions

Indexed keywords

BONE REMODELING; BONE RESORPTION; BONE STIFFNESS; BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACES; CEMENTLESS; CLINICAL DATA; DESIGN GOAL; FINITE ELEMENT METHODOLOGY; IMPLANT DESIGN; INGROWTH; MICRO MOTION; REDUCED STIFFNESS; TI ALLOYS;

DESIGN; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); STIFFNESS; TANTALUM; TITANIUM ALLOYS;

BONE;

TANTALUM; TITANIUM;

AGED; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE GROWTH; BONE REGENERATION; BONE REMODELING; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; OSTEOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL;

AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE REMODELING; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GOALS; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TANTALUM; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79952311689     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Jasty M., Bragdon C., Burke D., O'Connor D., Lowenstein J., Harris W.H. In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997, 79(5):707-714.
2. Huiskes R., Weinans H., Van R.B. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992, (274):124-134.
3. Head W.C., Bauk D.J., Emerson R.H. Titanium as the material of choice for cementless femoral components in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995, (311):85-90.
4. Huiskes R. Failed innovation in total hip replacement. Diagnosis and proposals for a cure. Acta Orthop Scand 1993, 64(6):699-716.
5. Taddei F., Pancanti A., Viceconti M. An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models. Med Eng Phys 2004, 26(1):61-69.
6. Trabelsi N., Yosibash Z., Milgrom C. Validation of subject-specific automated p-FE analysis of the proximal femur. J Biomech 2009, 42(3):234-241.
7. Folgado J., Fernandes P.R., Jacobs C.R., Pellegrini V.D. Influence of femoral stem geometry, material and extent of porous coating on bone ingrowth and atrophy in cementless total hip arthroplasty: an iterative finite element model. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2009, 12(2):135-145.
8. Van Rietbergen B., Huiskes R., Weinans H., Sumner D.R., Turner T.M., Galante J.O. ESB Research Award 1992. The mechanism of bone remodeling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems. J Biomech 1993, 26(4-5):369-382.
9. Reggiani B., Cristofolini L., Varini E., Viceconti M. Predicting the subject-specific primary stability of cementless implants during pre-operative planning: preliminary validation of subject-specific finite-element models. J Biomech 2007, 40(11):2552-2558.
10. Viceconti M., Brusi G., Pancanti A., Cristofolini L. Primary stability of an anatomical cementless hip stem: a statistical analysis. J Biomech 2006, 39(7):1169-1179.
11. Fernandes P.R., Folgado J., Jacobs C., Pellegrini V. A contact model with ingrowth control for bone remodelling around cementless stems. J Biomech 2002, 35(2):167-176.
12. Glassman A.H., Crowninshield R.D., Schenck R., Herberts P. A low stiffness composite biologically fixed prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, (393):128-136.
13. Hartzband M.A., Glassman A.H., Goldberg V.M., Jordan L.R., Crowninshield R.D., Fricka K.B., et al. Survivorship of a Low-stiffness extensively porous-coated femoral stem at 10 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468(2):433-440.
14. Bobyn J.D., Stackpool G.J., Hacking S.A., Tanzer M., Krygier J.J. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999, 81(5):907-914.
15. Levine B.R., Sporer S., Poggie R.A., la Valle C.J., Jacobs J.J. Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. Biomaterials 2006, 27(27):4671-4681.
16. Prymka M., Wu L., Hahne H.J., Koebke J., Hassenpflug J. The dimensional accuracy for preparation of the femoral cavity in HIP arthroplasty. A comparison between manual- and robot-assisted implantation of hip endoprosthesis stems in cadaver femurs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006, 126(1):36-44.
17. Waanders D., Janssen D., Miller M.A., Mann K.A., Verdonschot N. Fatigue creep damage at the cement-bone interface: an experimental and a micro-mechanical finite element study. J Biomech 2009, 42(15):2513-2519.
18. Keyak J.H., Falkinstein Y. Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load. Med Eng Phys 2003, 25(9):781-787.
19. Schileo E., Dall'ara E., Taddei F., Malandrino A., Schotkamp T., Baleani M., et al. An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models. J Biomech 2008, 41(11):2483-2491.
20. Sandborn P.M., Cook S.D., Spires W.P., Kester M.A. Tissue response to porous-coated implants lacking initial bone apposition. J Arthroplasty 1988, 3(4):337-346.
21. Clemow A.J., Weinstein A.M., Klawitter J.J., Koeneman J., Anderson J. Interface mechanics of porous titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1981, 15(1):73-82.
22. Heller M.O., Bergmann G., Deuretzbacher G., Dürselen L., Pohl M., Claes L., et al. Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. J Biomech 2001, 34(7):883-893.
23. Huiskes R., Weinans H., Grootenboer H.J., Dalstra M., Fudala B., Slooff T.J. Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. J Biomech 1987, 20(11-12):1135-1150.
24. Martin R.B. Porosity and specific surface of bone. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1984, 10(3):179-222.
25. Akhavan S., Matthiesen M.M., Schulte L., Penoyar T., Kraay M.J., Rimnac C.M., et al. Clinical and histologic results related to a low-modulus composite total hip replacement stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88(6):1308-1314.
26. Gruen T.A., McNeice G.M., Amstutz H.C. " Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979, (141):17-27.
27. Weinans H., Huiskes R., Grootenboer H.J. Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling. J Orthop Res 1992, 10(6):845-853.
28. Kerner J., Huiskes R., van Lenthe G.H., Weinans H., Van R.B., Engh C.A., et al. Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling. J Biomech 1999, 32(7):695-703.
29. Turner A.W., Gillies R.M., Sekel R., Morris P., Bruce W., Walsh W.R. Computational bone remodelling simulations and comparisons with DEXA results. J Orthop Res 2005, 23(4):705-712.
30. Pilliar R.M., Lee J.M., Maniatopoulos C. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986, (208):108-113.
31. Cameron H.U., Yoneda B.T., Pilliar R.M., Macnab I. The effect of early infection on bone ingrowth into porous metal implants. Acta Orthop Belg 1977, 43(1):71-74.
32. Bodén H.S., Sköldenberg O.G., Salemyr M.O., Lundberg H.J., Adolphson P.Y. Continuous bone loss around a tapered uncemented femoral stem: a long-term evaluation with DEXA. Acta Orthop 2006, 77(6):877-885.
33. Mueller L.A., Nowak T.E., Haeberle L., Mueller L.P., Kress A., Voelk M., et al. Progressive femoral cortical and cancellous bone density loss after uncemented tapered-design stem fixation. Acta Orthop 2010, 81(2):171-177.
34. Engh C.A., McGovern T.F., Bobyn J.D., Harris W.H. A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992, 74(7):1009-1020.
35. Friedman R.J., An Y.H., Ming J., Draughn R.A., Bauer T.W. Influence of biomaterial surface texture on bone ingrowth in the rabbit femur. J Orthop Res 1996, 14(3):455-464.
36. Kienapfel H., Sprey C., Wilke A., Griss P. Implant fixation by bone ingrowth. J Arthroplasty 1999, 14(3):355-368.
37. Kärrholm J., Anderberg C., Snorrason F., Thanner J., Langeland N., Malchau H., et al. Evaluation of a femoral stem with reduced stiffness. A randomized study with use of radiostereometry and bone densitometry. J Bone Joint Surg Am A 2002, 84(9):1651-1658.
38. Schneider E., Kinast C., Eulenberger J., Wyder D., Eskilsson G., Perren S.M. A comparative study of the initial stability of cementless hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, (248):200-209.
39. Götze C., Steens W., Vieth V., Poremba C., Claes L., Steinbeck J. Primary stability in cementless femoral stems: custom-made versus conventional femoral prosthesis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002, 17(4):267-273.
40. Bühler D.W., Berlemann U., Lippuner K., Jaeger P., Nolte L.P. Three-dimensional primary stability of cementless femoral stems. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1997, 12(2):75-86.
41. Pancanti A., Bernakiewicz M., Viceconti M. The primary stability of a cementless stem varies between subjects as much as between activities. J Biomech 2003, 36(6):777-785.
42. Kuiper J.H., Huiskes R. Friction and stem stiffness affect dynamic interface motion in total hip replacement. J Orthop Res 1996, 14(1):36-43.
43. Harvey E.J., Bobyn J.D., Tanzer M., Stackpool G.J., Krygier J.J., Hacking S.A. Effect of flexibility of the femoral stem on bone-remodeling and fixation of the stem in a canine total hip arthroplasty model without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999, 81(1):93-107.
44. Rancourt D., Shirazi-Adl A., Drouin G., Paiement G. Friction properties of the interface between porous-surfaced metals and tibial cancellous bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1990, 24(11):1503-1519.
45. Shirazi-Adl A., Dammak M., Paiement G. Experimental determination of friction characteristics at the trabecular bone/porous-coated metal interface in cementless implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1993, 27(2):167-175.
46. Zhang Y., Ahn P.B., Fitzpatrick D.C., Heiner A.D., Poggie R.A., Brown T.D. Interfacial frictional behavior: cancellous bone, cortical bone, and a novel porous tantalum biomaterial. J Musculoskelet Res 1999, 3(4):245-251.