Friction and stem stiffness affect dynamic interface motion in total hip replacement

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 36-43

  Kuiper, J H ^a   Huiskes, R ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FRICTION; HIP PROSTHESES; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STRESSES;

ARTHROPLASTY; CYCLIC MOTION; INTERFACE STRESSES; PROXIMAL FEMUR; STEM STIFFNESS; TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT;

ORTHOPEDICS;

ARTICLE; FEMUR; FRICTION; MODEL; MOTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGIDITY; SHEAR STRESS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; YOUNG MODULUS;

EID: 0029880089     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100140108     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. 1 Callaghan JJ, Fulghum CS, Glisson R, Stranne SK: The effect of femoral stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented porous‐coated total hip prostheses: comparison of straight‐stem and curved‐stem designs. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 74: 839–848, 1992
2. 2 Carter DR, Orr TE, Fyhrie DP: Relationships between loading history and femoral cancellous bone architecture. J Biomech 22: 231–244, 1989
3. 3 Collier JP, Mayor MB, Chae JC, Surprenant VA, Surprenant HP, Dauphinais LA: 1988 Proceedings of the Hip Society—symposium: macroscopic and microscopic evidence of prosthetic fixation with porous‐coated materials. Clin Orthop 235: 173–180, 1988
4. 4 Hayes WC, Perren SM: Plate‐bone friction in the compression fixation of fractures. Clin Orthop 89: 236–240, 1972
5. 5 Huiskes R: The various stress patterns of press‐fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems. Clin Orthop 261: 27–38, 1990
6. 6 Jakim I, Barlin C, Sweet MBE: RM isoelastic total hip arthroplasty: a review of 34 cases. J Arthroplasty 3: 191–199, 1988
7. 7 Konieczynski DD, Bartel DL: The effects of bone quality and interface friction on early post‐operative performance of an anatomic noncemented implant. Trans Orthop Res Soc 18: 447, 1993
8. 8 McKellop H, Ebramzadeh E, Niederer PG, Sarmiento A: Comparison of the stability of press‐fit hip prosthesis femoral stems using a synthetic model femur. J Orthop Res 9: 297–305, 1991
9. 9 Noble PC, Alexander JW, Maltry JA, Yew DT, Tullos HS: The myth of a press‐fit cementless femoral prosthesis. Presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Atlanta, 1988
10. 10 O'Connor JJ: Standard Handbook of Lubrication Engineering. New York, McGraw‐Hill, 1968
11. 11 Otani T, Whiteside LA, White SE, McCarthy DS: Effects of femoral component material properties on cementless fixation in total hip arthroplasty: a comparison study between carbon composite, titanium alloy, and stainless steel. J Arthroplasty 9: 67–74, 1993
12. 12 Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C: Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous‐surfaced implants. Clin Orthop 208: 108–113, 1986
13. 13 Rubin PJ, Rakotomanana RL, Leyvraz PF, Zysset PK, Curnier A, Heegaard JH: Frictional interface micromotions and anisotropic stress distribution in a femoral total hip component. J Biomech 26: 725–739, 1993
14. 14 Schatzker J, Horne JG, Sumner‐Smith G: The effect of movement on the holding power of screws in bone. Clin Orthop 111: 257–262, 1975
15. 15 Schimmel J‐W, Huiskes R: Primary fit of the Lord cementless total hip: a geometric study in cadavers. Acta Orthop Scand 59: 638–642, 1988
16. 16 Schneider E, Eulenberger J, Steiner W, Wyder D, Friedman RJ, Perren SM: Experimental method for the in vitro testing of the initial stability of cementless hip prostheses. J Biomech 22: 735–744, 1989
17. 17 Sharkey PF, Albert TJ, Hume EL, Rothman RH, Beauchamp JA: Initial stability of femoral components in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study. Trans Orthop Res Soc 16: 517, 1991
18. 18 Shirazi‐Adl A, Dammak M, Forcione A, Paiement G: Friction measurements at the bone/implant interface—application to the analysis of cementless prostheses. Trans Orthop Res Soc 17: 382, 1992
19. 19 Søballe K, Hansen ES, Rasmussen HB, Bünger C: Hydroxyapatite implant coating modifies membrane formation during unstable mechanical conditions. Trans Orthop Res Soc 16: 35, 1991
20. 20 Spector M: Current concepts of bone ingrowth and remodeling. In: Non‐Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty, pp 69–85. Ed by RH Fitzgerald Jr. New York, Raven Press, 1988
21. 21 Uhthoff HK, Germain J‐P: The reversal of tissue differentiation around screws. Clin Orthop 123: 248–252, 1977
22. 22 Verdonschot N, Huiskes R: FEM analyses of hip prostheses: validity of the 2‐D side plate model and the effects of torsion. In: Proceedings of the 7th Meeting of the European Society of Biomechanics, p A20. Århus, July 1990