Total knee replacement in patients with significant femoral bowing in the coronal plane: A comparison of conventional and computer-assisted surgery in an asian population

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 93 B, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 345-350

  Huang, T W ^a,b   Hsu, W H ^a,b   Peng, K T ^a,b   Hsu, R W W ^a,b  

^a CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; ASIAN; BIOMECHANICS; BONE BOWING; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; BONE MALALIGNMENT; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79952260405     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B3.25990     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Weng YJ, Hsu RW, Hsu WH. Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:668-73.
2. Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life?: comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:560-9.
3. Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop 1983;173:178-83. (Pubitemid 13115042)
4. Dorr L, Boiardo RA. Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1986;205:5-11. (Pubitemid 16011250)
5. Jeffrey RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1991;73-B:709-14.
6. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement: its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 1994;299:153-6. (Pubitemid 24051713)
7. Perillo-Marcone A, Barrett DS, Taylor M. The importance of tibial alignment: finite element analysis of tibial malalignment. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:1020-7.
8. Taylor M, Barrett DS. Explicit finite element simulation of eccentric loading in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 2003;414:162-71. (Pubitemid 37107411)
9. Stulberg SD. How accurate is current TKR instrumentation? Clin Orthop 2003;416:177-84. (Pubitemid 37413637)
10. Brys DA, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Vaughn BK. A comparison of intramedullary and extramedullary alignment systems for tibial component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1991;263:175-9.
11. Maestro A, Harwin SF, Sandoval MG, Vaquero DH, Murcia A. Influence of intramedullary versus extramedullary guides on final total knee arthroplasty component position: a radiographic analysis. J Arthroplasty 1998;13:552-8. (Pubitemid 28380814)
12. Teter KE, Bregman D, Colwell CW Jr. Accuracy of intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment cutting systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1995;321:106-10.
13. Bankes MJ, Back DL, Cannon SR, Briggs TW. The effect of component malalignment on the clinical and radiological outcome of the Kinemax total knee replacement. Knee 2003;10:55-60. (Pubitemid 36324515)
14. Mahaluxmivala J, Bankes MJ, Nicolai P, Aldam CH, Allen PW. The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit Condylar posterior cruciate sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2001;1:635-40.
15. Peterson TL, Engh GA. Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1988;3:67-72.
16. Bone JV, Roger DJ, Laskin RS, Peterson MG, Paulsen CA. Tibial intramedullary alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 1995;8:7-11.
17. Ko PS, Tio MK, Ban CM, et al. Radiologic analysis of the tibial intramedullary canal in Chinese varus knees: implications in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:212-15. (Pubitemid 32163850)
18. Yang SH, Liu TK. Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment guides in total knee arthroplasty. J Formos Med Assoc 1998;97:564-8.
19. Lonner JH, Siliski JM, Lotke PA. Simultaneous femoral osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty for treatment of osteoarthritis associated with severe extra-articular deformity. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000;82-A:342-8. (Pubitemid 30140334)
20. Wang JW, Wang CJ. Total knee arthroplasty for arthritis of the knee with extra-articular deformity. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002;84-A:1769-74.
21. Mullaji AB, Marawar SV, Mittal V. A comparison of coronal plane axial femoral relationships in Asian patients with varus osteoarthritic knees and healthy knees. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:861-7.
22. Nagamine R, Miura H, Bravo CV, et al. Anatomic variations should be considered in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 2000;5:232-7. (Pubitemid 30431798)
23. Mullaji A, Shetty GM. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty for arthritis with extra-articular deformity. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:1164-9.
24. Yau WP, Chiu KY, Tang WM, Ng TP. Coronal bowing of the femur and tibia in Chinese: its incidence and effects on total knee arthroplasty planning. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2007;15:32-6.
25. Tang WM, Chiu KY, Kwan MF, Ng TP, Yau WP. Sagittal bowing of the distal femur in Chinese patients who require total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2005;23:41-5. (Pubitemid 40045075)
26. Fehring TK, Mason JB, Moskal J, et al. When computer-assisted knee replacement is the best alternative. Clin Orthop 2006;452:132-6. (Pubitemid 44690657)
27. Chou WY, Ko JY, Wang CJ, et al. Navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty for a knee with malunion of the distal femur. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:1239.
28. Klein GR, Austin MS, Smith EB, Hozack WJ. Total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation in patients with deformities of the femur and tibia. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:284-8. (Pubitemid 43339886)
29. Mizu-uchi H, Matsuda S, Miura H, et al. The evaluation of post-operative alignment in total knee replacement using a CT-based navigation system. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:1025-31.
30. Hsu RWW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EYS. Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop 1990;255:215-27. (Pubitemid 20187451)
31. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:9-12. (Pubitemid 20204774)
32. Tang WM, Zhu YH, Chiu KY. Axial alignment of the lower extremity in Chinese adults. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000;82-A:1603-8.
33. McGrory JE, Trousdale RT, Pagnano MW, Nigbur M. Preoperative hip to ankle radiographs in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2002;404:196-202. (Pubitemid 35351071)
34. Kim YH, Kim JS, Choi Y, Kwon OR. Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2009;91-A:14-19.
35. Lutzner J. Gunther KP, Kirschner S. Functional outcome after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010;18:1339-44.
36. Seon JK, Park SJ, Lee KB, et al. Functional comparison of total knee arthroplasty performed with and without a navigation system. Int Orthop 2009;33:987-90.
37. Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver RJ. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:477-80. (Pubitemid 46851126)