Anatomic variations should be considered in total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 232-237

  Nagamine, Ryuji ^a   Miura, Hiromasa ^a   Bravo, Cristian V ^a   Urabe, Ken ^a   Matsuda, Shuichi ^a   Miyanishi, Keita ^a   Hirata, Go ^a   Iwamoto, Yukihide ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Anatomic variation; Radiograph; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; JAPAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; SURGICAL ANATOMY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 0033921062     PISSN: 09492658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s007760050157     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Anouchi YS, Whiteside LA, Kaiser AD, et al. The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop 1993;287:170-7.
2. Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, et al. Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77: 1331-4.
3. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, et al. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop 1993;286:40-7.
4. Hungerford DS. Alignment in total knee replacement. Instr Course Lect 1995;44:455-68.
5. th Japanese ed. Tokyo: Ishiyaku Shuppan; 1986. p. 68.
6. th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Feb. 21-24, 1994; New Orleans. Orthopaedic Research Society; 1994. p. 675.
7. Martin JW, Whiteside LA. The influence of joint line position on knee stability after condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1990;259:146-56.
8. Matsuda S, Matsuda H, Miyagi T, et al. Femoral condyle geometry in the normal and varus knee. Clin Orthop 1998;349: 183-8.
9. Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ. Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:745-9
10. Nagamme R, Whiteside LA, White SE, et al. Patellar tracking after total knee arthroplasty. The effect of tibial tray malrotation and articular surface configuration. Clin Orthop 1994;304:263-71.
11. Nagamine R, White SE, McCarthy DS, et al. Effect of rotational malposition of the femoral component on knee stability kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995;10: 265-70.
12. Nagamine R, Miura H, Inoue Y, et al. Reliability of the anteroposterior axis and the posterior condylar axis for determining rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 1998;3:194-8.
13. Nagamine R, Whiteside LA, Miura H, et al. Rotational malalignment of the femoral and tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. In: Imura S, Wada M, Omori H, editors. Joint arthroplasty. Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo: Springer; 1998. p. 373-83.
14. Ogata K, Yoshii I, Kawamura H, et al. Standing radiographs cannot determine the correction in high tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991;73:927-31.
15. Stiehl JB, Cherveny PM. Femoral rotational alignment using the tibial shaft axis in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1996;331: 47-55.
16. Yoshioka Y, Siu D, Cooke DV. The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:873-80.
17. Whiteside LA, Arima J. The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1995;321:168-72.