Navigation-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty for a Knee With Malunion of the Distal Femur

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1239.e13-1239.e17

  Chou, Wen Yi ^a   Ko, Jih Yang ^a   Wang, Ching Jen ^a   Wang, Feng Sheng ^a   Wu, Re Wen ^a   Wong, To ^a  

^a CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

malunion femur; navigation; total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; VANCOMYCIN;

ADULT; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL FEATURE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FRACTURE NONUNION; HUMAN; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MALE; OPEN REDUCTION; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PHYSIOTHERAPY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANGE OF MOTION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 55649112219     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Mann III J.W. Total knee replacement with associated extra-articular angular deformity of the femur. In: Scuderi G.R., and Tria Jr. A.J. (Eds). Surgical techniques in total knee arthroplasty (2002), Springer-Verlag, New York 636
2. Anderson K.C., Buehler K.C., and Markel D.C. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplast 20 (2005) 132
3. Kalairajah Y., Simpson D., Cossey A.J., et al. Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87-B (2005) 1480
4. Caillouette J.T., and Anzel S.H. Fat embolism syndrome following the intramedullary alignment guide in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 251 (1990) 198
5. Lonner J.H., Siliski J.M., and Lotke P.A. Simultaneous femoral osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty for treatment of osteoarthritis associated with severe extra-articular deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A (2000) 342
6. Chauhan S.K., Scott R.G., Breidahl W., et al. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86-B (2004) 372
7. Chin P.L., Yang K.Y., Yeo S.J., et al. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplast 20 (2005) 618
8. Sparmann M., Wolke B., Czupalla H., et al. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85-B (2003) 830
9. Haaker R.G., Stockheim M., Kamp M., et al. Computer-assisted navigation increased precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 433 (2005) 152
10. Matziolis G., Krocker D., Weiss U., et al. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89-A (2007) 236
11. Fehring T.K., Mason J.B., Moskal J., et al. When computer-assisted knee replacement is the best alternative. Clin Orthop 452 (2006) 132
12. Klein G.R., Austin M.S., Smith E.B., et al. Total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation in patients with deformities of the femur and tibia. J Arthroplast 21 (2006) 284
13. Tria Jr A.J. Total knee arthroplasty. In: Scuderi G.R., and Tria Jr. A.J. (Eds). Surgical techniques in total knee arthroplasty (2002), Springer-Verlag, New York 177
14. Sharkey P.F., Hozack W.J., Rothman R.H., et al. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?. Clin Orthop 404 (2002) 7
15. Mulhall K.J., Ghomrawi H.M., Scully S., et al. Current etiologies and modes of failure in total knee arthroplasty revision. Clin Orthop 446 (2006) 45