Explicit finite element simulation of eccentric loading in total knee replacement

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 414, Issue , 2003, Pages 162-171

  Taylor, Mark ^a   Barrett, D S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FLUOROSCOPY; GAIT; IN VIVO STUDY; KINEMATICS; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VALIDATION PROCESS; WEIGHT BEARING;

EID: 0042781392     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000079267.91782.58     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bartel DL, Bicknell VL, Ithaca MS, et al: The effect of conformity, thickness and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 68A:1041-1051, 1986.
2. Bartel DL, Burstein AH, Santavicca EA, et al: Performance of the tibial component in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 64A:1026-1033, 1982.
3. Blunn GW, Joshi AB, Minns RJ, et al: Wear in retrieved condylar knee arthroplasties: A comparison of wear in different designs of 280 retrieved condylar knee prostheses. J Arthroplasty 12:281-290, 1997.
4. Blunn GW, Walker PS, Joshi A, et al: The dominance of cyclic sliding in producing wear in total knee joint replacements. Clin Orthop 273:253-260, 1991.
5. Collier JP, Mayor MB, McNamara JL, et al: Analysis of the failure of 122 polyethylene inserts from uncemented tibial components. Clin Orthop 273:232-242, 1991.
6. Copper JR, Dowson D, Fisher J: Macroscopic and microscopic wear mechanism in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Wear 162-164:378-384, 1993.
7. Coull R, Bankes MJK, Rossouw DJ: Evaluation of tibial component angles in 79 consecutive total knee arthroplasties. Knee 6:235-237, 1999.
8. DesJardins JD, Walker PS, Haider H, et al: The use of a force-controlled dynamic knee simulator to quantify the mechanical performance of total knee replacement designs during functional activity. J Biomech 33:1231-1242, 2000.
9. Godest AC, Beaugonin M, Haug E, et al: Simulation of a knee joint replacement during a gait cycle using explicit finite element analysis. J Biomech 35:267-276, 2002.
10. Godest AC, Gregson PJ, Beaugonin M, et al: Explicit dynamic FE code for prediction of polyethylene stresses in total knee replacement, XVII Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics, August 8-13, 1999, Calgary, Canada 178, 1999.
11. Haider H, Walker PS: Analysis and recommendations for the optimum spring configurations for soft tissue restraint in force controlled knee simulator testing. Trans Orthop Res Soc 27:912, 2001.
12. Hilding M, Asplund S, Bäckbro B, et al: Alignment accuracy by two different instrumentation systems in total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 6:150-156, 1993.
13. Kennedy FE, Currier JH, Plumet S, et al: Contact fatigue failure of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene bearing components of knee prostheses. J Tribology 122:332-339, 2000.
14. Liau JJ, Cheng CK, Huang CH, et al: The influence of contact alignment of the tibiofemoral joint of the prostheses in in vitro mechanical testing. Clin Biomech 14:717-721, 1999.
15. Liau JJ, Cheng CK, Huang CH, et al: The effect of malalignment on stresses in polyethylene component of total knee prostheses: A finite element analysis. Clin Biomech 17:140-146, 2002.
16. Matsuda S, Whiteside LA, White SE: The effect of varus tilt on contact stresses in total knee arthroplasty: A biomechanical study. Orthopedics 22:303-307, 1999.
17. McNamara JL, Collier JP, Mayor MB, et al: A comparison of contact pressures in tibial and patellar total knee components before and after service in vivo. Clin Orthop 299:104-113, 1992.
18. Otto JK, Callaghan JJ, Brown TD: A multiple-interface contact finite element analysis of a rotating platform total knee. Trans Orthop Res Soc 26:1085, 2001.
19. Rawlinson J, Furman B, Li S, et al: Kinematics, stresses and damage from a TKR simulator and a finite element model. Trans Orthop Res Soc 26:216, 2001.
20. Reeves EA, Barton DC, FitzPatrick DP, et al: A two-dimensional model of cyclic strain accumulation in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene knee replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H 212:189-198, 1998.
21. Sathasivam S, Walker PS: Computer model to predict subsurface damage in tibial inserts of total knees. J Orthop Res 16:564-571, 1998.
22. Stiehl JB, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, et al: In vivo determination of condylar lift-off and screw-home in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:293-299, 1999.
23. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA: Detrimental kinematics of a flat on flat total condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 365:139-148, 1999.
24. Szivek JA, Anderson PL, Benjamin JB: Average and peak contact stress distribution evaluation of total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 11:952-963, 1996.
25. Walker PS, Blunn GW, Broome DR, et al: A knee simulating machine for the performance evaluation of total knee joint replacements. J Biomech 30:83-89, 1997.
26. Walker PS, Blunn GW, Perry J, et al: Methodology for long-term wear testing of total knee replacements. Clin Orthop 372:290-301, 2000.