Project stream: A 13‐year follow‐up of a pre‐college program for middle‐ and high‐school underrepresented gifted

Roeper Review

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 55-63

  Clasen, Donna Rae ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952106090     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190609554385     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Alamprese, J. A., Erlanger, W. J., & Brigham, N. (1988). No gift wasted: Effective strategies for educating highly able, disadvantaged students in mathematics and science (Vol. 2). VS. Department of Education: Office of Planning, Budget, and Evaluation.
2. American Association for Gifted Children (1979). On being gifted. New York: Walker & Company.
3. Baldwin, A. Y. (1984). The Baldwin Identification Matrix 2 for the identification of the gifted and talented: A handbook for its use. New York: Trillium Press.
4. Baldwin, A. Y. (1994). The seven plus story: Developing hidden talents among students in socioeconomically disadvantaged environments. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 80-84.
5. Baldwin, A. Y., Gear, G. H., & Lucito, L. J. (Eds.). (1980). Educational planning for the gifted: Overcoming cultural, geographic, and socioeconomic barriers. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
6. Becker, J. (1993). Urban scholars: Access to excellence for students and schools. In C. M. Callahan, C. A. Tomlinson, & P. M. Pizzat (Eds.), Contexts for promise: Noteworthy practices and innovations in the identifcation of gifted students (pp. 85-102).Charlottesville, VA: National Research Center of the Gifted and Talented.
7. Bernal, E. M. (1974). Gifted Mexican American children: An ethno-scientific perspective. California Journal of Educational Research, 25. 261-273.
8. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine.
9. Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational research: An introduction (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
10. Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (1994). Identifying young, potentially gifted, economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 164-171.
11. Cavazos, L. F. (2002). Emphasizing performance goals and high-quality education for all students. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 690-697.
12. Clasen, D. R. (1993). Project STREAM: Support, training and resources for educating able minorities. In C. M. Callahan, C. A. Tomlinson, & P. M Pizzat (Eds.), Contexts for promise: Noteworthy practices and innovations in the identification of gifted students (pp. 1-21). Charlottesville, VA: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
13. Clasen, D. R. (2003, January). Project STREAM: A longterm university/school partnership extending learning borders for education majors and school-age students of color. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, New Orleans, LA.
14. Clasen, D. R., Middleton, J. A., & Connell, T. J. (1994). Assessing artistic and problem-solving performance in minority and non-minority students using a nontraditional multidimensional approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 27-32.
15. Comia, I., Stubbs, C., & Winters, N. (1983). Art is elementary: Teaching visual thinking through art concepts. Layton, UT: Gibbs M. Smith.
16. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Damiani, V. B. (1996). The Individual Family Support Plan: A tool to assist special populations of gifted learners. Roeper Review, 18, 293-297.
18. Feldman, D. H. (1991). Has there been a paradigm shift in gifted education? In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings from the 1991 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 89-94). Unionville, NY: Trillium Press.
19. Feldhusen, J. F. (1991). Saturday and summer programs. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education (pp. 197-208). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20. Frasier, M. M. (1989a). Identification of gifted Black students: Developing new perspectives. In C. J. Maker & S. W. Schiever (Eds.), Critical issues in gifted education: Defensible programs for cultural and ethnic minorities (Vol. 2, pp. 213-225). Rockville, MD: Aspen Publishers.
21. Frasier, M. M. (1989b). Poor and minority students can be gifted, too. Educational Leadership, 46(6), 16-18.
22. Frasier, M. M. (1994). A manual for implementing the Frasier Talent Assessment Profile (F-TAP): A multiple criteria model for the identification and education of gifted students. Athens, GA: Georgia Southern Press.
23. Gallagher, J. J. (2000). Changing paradigms for gifted education in the United States. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of gifiedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 681-693). New York: Pergamon Press.
24. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
25. Goertz, M. J., Phemister, L., & Bemal, E. M. (1996). The new challenge: An ethnically integrated enrichment program for gifted students. Roeper Review, 18, 298-300.
26. Goodlad, J. (1991). School-university partnerships. The Education Digest, 56, 58-61.
27. Griffin, N. S., & McKenzie, J. (1993). Nebraska Starry Night: A behavior-based observation protocol, version 8.893. Lincoln: University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
28. Han, K., & Marvin, C. (2000). A five year follow-up study of the Nebraska Project: Still a long way to go…. Roeper Review, 23, 25-33.
29. Hiatt, E. L. (1994). Promises to keep-The story of Project Promise. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 85-88.
30. Jones, M., Yonezawa, S., Ballesteros, E., & Mehan, H. (2002). Shaping pathways to higher education. Educational Researcher, 31(2), 3-11.
31. Kaplan, S. N. (1986). Qualitatively differentiated curricula. In C. J. Maker (Ed.), Critical issues in gifted education: Defensible programs for the gifted (pp. 121-134). Rockville, MD: Aspen.
32. Kay, S. I., & Subotnik, R. F. (1994). Talent beyond words: Unveiling spatial, expressive, kinesthetic, and musical talent in young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 70-74.
33. Knapp, M. S. (1995). How shall we study comprehensive collaborative services for children and families? Educational Researcher, 24(4), 5-16.
34. Levine, A., & Nidiffer, J. (1996). Beating the odds: How the poor get to college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35. Loza, P. P. (2003). A system at risk: College outreach programs and the educational neglect of underachieving Latino high school students. The Urban Review, 35, 43-57.
36. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1994). The study of mathematically precocious youth (SMPY): The first three decades of a planned fifty-year longitudinal study of intellectual talent. In R. F. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of gifiedness and talent (pp. 255-281). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
37. Lyall, K. (1991, November). Precollege programs: Early intervention is our key to success. Paper presented at the Precollege Conference, Madison, WI.
38. Maker, C. J. (1996). Identification of gifted minority students: A national problem, needed changes and a promising solution. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 41-50.
39. Maker, C. J., Nielson, A. B., & Rogers, J. A. (1994). Giftedness, diversity, and problem solving. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27(1), 4-19.
40. Moon, T. R., Callahan, C. M., & Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The effects of mentoring relationships on preservice teachers' attitudes toward academically diverse students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 56-62.
41. Mumford, M. D., Connelly, M. S., Baughman, W. A., & Marks, M. A. (1994). Creativity and problem solving: Cognition, adaptability, and wisdom. Roeper Review, 16, 241-246.
42. Nielsen, M. E., Higgins, L. D., & Hammond, A. E. (1993). The Twice-Exceptional Child Project: Identifying and serving gifted/handicapped learners. In C. M. Callahan, C. A. Tomlinson, & P. M. Pizzat (Eds.), Contexts for promise: Noteworthy practices and innovations in the identification of gifted students (pp. 145-168). Charlottesville, VA: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
43. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2003). Special summer and Saturday programs for gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education (3rd ed., pp. 219-228). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
44. Parker, J. P. (1998). The Torrance Creative Scholars Program. Roeper Review, 21, 32-35.
45. Passow, A. H. (1972). The gifted and the disadvantaged. The National Elementary Principal, 51, 24-31.
46. Perna, L. W. (2000). Promoting college enrollment through early intervention. The Eric Review, 8(1), 4-9.
47. Reid, C., Udall, A., Romanoff, B., & Algozzine, B. (1999). Comparison of traditional and problem solving assessment criteria. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 252-264.
48. Renzulli, J. S., & Purcell, J. H. (1996). Gifted education: A look around and a look ahead. Roeper Review, 18, 173-178.
49. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: New directions for developing high-end learning. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education (2nd ed., pp. 136-154). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., Callahan, C., White, A., &
50. Hartman, R. (1977). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
51. Richert, E. S. (2003). Excellence with justice in identification and programming. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 146-158). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
52. Robinson, A. (Ed.). (1994). Javits Grant Projects [Special issue]. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38.
53. Ross, P. O. (Ed.). (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
54. Siegle, D., & Powell, T. (2004). Exploring teacher biases when nominating students for gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 21-29.
55. Spicker, H. H. (1992). Identifying and enriching rural gifted children. Educational Horizons. 70, 60-65.
56. Stanley, J. C. (1979). The study and facilitation of talent in mathematics. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and talented: Their education and development. Seventyeighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 169-185). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57. Sternberg, R. J. (1981). A componential theory of intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 86-93.
58. Subotnik, R. F., & Arnold, K. D. (1993). Time for a change. Roeper Review, 15, 118-120.
59. Swanson, J. D. (1995). Gifted African-American children in rural schools: Searching for the answers. Roeper Review, 17, 261-266.
60. S wiatek, M. A. (1993). A decade of longitudinal research on academic acceleration through the study of mathematically precocious youth. Roeper Review, 15, 120-124.
61. Themstrom, A., & Themstrom, S. (2003). No excuses: Closing the racial gap in learning. New York: Simon & Schuster.