Gifted education: A look around and a look ahead

Roeper Review

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 173-178

  Renzulli, Joseph S ^a,b   Purcell, Jeanne H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b National Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013235785     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783199609553730     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., & Mullis, I. V. S. (1989). Crossroads in American education. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
2. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (1995). Gifted education in the regular classroom [video], (Available from Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1250 N. Pitt Street, Alexandia: VA).
3. Baldwin, A. Y. (1994). The seven plus story: Developing hidden talent among students in socioeconomically deprived environments. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(2), 80-84.
4. Bemal, E. M. (1978). The identification of gifted Chicano children. In A. Y. Baldwin, G. H. Gear, & L. J. Lucito (Eds.), Educational planning for the gifted: Overcoming cultural, geographic and socioeconomic barriers. Reston, VA: The Council of Exceptional Children.
5. Bloom, B. (1985) Developing talent in young children. New York: Ballentine.
6. Callahan, C. M. & Mclntire, J. A. (1994). Identifying outstanding talent in American Indian and Alaskan Native students. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
7. Coleman, L. J. (1994). Portfolio assessment: A key to identifying hidden talents and empowering teachers of young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(2), 65-69.
8. Coleman, M. R., & Gallagher, J. J. (1993). Report on the state policies related to the identification of gifted students. Chapel Hill, NC: Gifted Education Policy Studies Program.
9. Czikszentmihalyi, M., & Robinson, R. E. (1986). Culture, time and the development of talent. In R. S. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 264-284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. DeBuse, M. & Shoemaker, B. J. E. (1994). The changing role of the TAG teacher: An Oregon Case Study. Roeper Review, 16(1), 58-61.
11. Feldhusen, J. F. (1989). Why the public schools will continue to neglect the gifted. Gifted Child Today, 12(2), 55-59.
12. Feldman, D. H. (1991). Has there been a paradigm shift in gifted education. Educating able learners: Discovering and nuturing talent, 16(4), 14-19.
13. Fernandez, J. A. (1993). Special circular #43, Early childhood education initiative. Brooklyn, NY: New York City Board of Education.
14. Frasier, M. M. (1989). Identification of gifted black students: Developing new perspectives. In C. J. Maker & S. S. Schiever (Eds.), Critical issues in gifted education: Defensible programs for cultural and ethnic minorities (pp. 213-225). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
15. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.
16. Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind. New York: Basic Books.
17. Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw Hill.
18. Jones, R. L., Mullis, V. S., Raizen, S. A., Weiss, I. R., & Weston, E. A. (1992). The 1990 science report card. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
19. Kelly, D. (1991, October 23). Programs for the gifted: Equitable or elitist? USA Today, p. 18.
20. Kirschenbaum, R. (1988). Methods for identifying gifted and talented American Indian students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11(3), 53-63.
21. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Marcus, J. (1992, February 2). Gifted programs under fire. The Boston Sunday Globe, pp. 35, 37.
23. Mullis, V. S., Dossey, J. A., Owen, E. H., & Phillips, G. W. (1993). The National Assessment of Educational Progress report card for the nation and the states. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
24. Nordheimer, J. (1993, November 29). Education for the gifted, seen as luxury, faces cutbacks. The New York Times, pp. 1, 51.
25. Passow, A. H., & Rudnitski, R. A. (1993). State policies regarding education of the gifted as reflected in legislation and regulation. (CRS93302) Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
26. Purcell, J. H. (1992). Programs in states without a mandate: An "endangered species?". Roeper Review, 15(2), 93-95.
27. Purcell, J. H. (1993). The status of programs for high ability students in a sample of twenty states and the factors that led to their retention and elimination. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Storrs, CT: The University of Connecticut.
28. Radin, C. A. (1991, September 30). Gifted students face test of indifference. The Boston Globe, pp. 1, 14.
29. Reis, S. M., Burns, D. E., & Renzulli, J. S. (1992). Curriculum compacting: The complete guide to modifying the regular curriculum for high ability students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
30. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180-184, 261.
31. Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Renzulli, J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
33. Renzulli, J. S., & Smith, L. (1978). The compactor. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
34. Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., Callahan, G, White, A., & Hartman, R. (1977). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
35. Richert, E. S., Alvino, J., & McDonnel, R. (1982). The national report on identification: Assessment and recommendations for comprehensive identification of gifted and talented youth. Sewell, NJ: Educational Information and Resource Center for the US Department of Education.
36. Robinson, N. M. (1987). The early development of precocity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31(4), 161-164.
37. Roedell, W., Jackson, N. E., & Robinson, H. B. (1980). Giftedyoung children. New York: Teachers College Press.
38. Ruiz, R. (1989). Considerations in the education of gifted Hispanic students. In C. J. Maker & S. S. Schiever (Eds.), Critical issues in gifted education: Defensible programs for cultural and ethnic minorities (pp. 60-65). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
39. Sandel, A., McCallister, C., & Nash, W. (1993). Child search and screening activities for pre-school gifted children. Roeper Review, 16(2), 98-102.
40. Sizer, T. (1992). Horace's Compromise: The dilemma of the American school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
41. Slatin, B. E. (1995). The emerging role of the principal in restructuring for gifted education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fordham University, New York.
42. Stemberg, R. S. (1986). A triarchic theory in intellectual giftedness. In R. S. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 223-243). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Stevenson, H. W., Chen, C., & Lee, S. Y. (1993). Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese and American children: Ten years later. Science, 259, 53-58.
44. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986). The enrichment matrix model. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented, (pp. 391-428). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
45. Taradash, G. (1994). Extending educational opportunities for middle school gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(2), 89-94.
46. Tonemah, S. (1987). Assessing American Indian gifted and talented students' abilities. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10(3), 181-194.
47. US Department of Education (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talents. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
48. VanTassel-Baska, J. (1986). Effective curriculum and instructional models for talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(4), 164-169.
49. Ward, S. B. & Lundrum, M. S. (1995). Resource consultation: An alternative service delivery model for gifted education, Roeper Review, 16(4), 276-279.
50. Weinbrenner, S. (1992). Teaching gifted kinds in the regular classroom. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing.