Hierarchical nanoengineered surfaces for enhanced cytoadhesion and drug delivery

Biomaterials

Volumn 32, Issue 13, 2011, Pages 3499-3506

  Fischer, Kathleen E ^a   Nagaraj, Ganesh ^a   Hugh Daniels, R ^b   Li, Esther ^b   Cowles, Verne E ^c   Miller, Jennifer L ^c   Bunger, Mark D ^a   Desai, Tejal A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Nanosys Inc   (United States)

^c Pharmacokinetics Depomed Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Actin; Adhesion; Cell adhesion; Drug delivery; Nanotopography; Surface Topography

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; CELL LINES; CELLULAR STRUCTURE; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; IN-VITRO; IN-VIVO; MICRO-PARTICLES; MUCOSAL TISSUES; MUCUS LAYER; NANO SCALE; NANOTOPOGRAPHIES; NANOWIRE SURFACE; PARTICLE LOADING; PHYSICAL INTERACTIONS; PULL-OFF FORCES; RETENTION TIME; SHEAR FLOW MODEL; STEM CELL DIFFERENTIATION; SUBCELLULAR STRUCTURE; VASCULATURE; WOUND HEALING;

BODY FLUIDS; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; DRUG DELIVERY; DRUG INTERACTIONS; HISTOLOGY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NANOWIRES; PROTEINS; SHEAR FLOW; STEM CELLS; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ADHESION;

MICROSPHERE; NANOENGINEERED MICROPARTICLE; NANOPARTICLE; NANOWIRE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL LINE; CELL MIGRATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; ELUTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MUCOUS CELL; NANOENGINEERING; NANOFABRICATION; NANOTOPOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR FLOW; STEM CELL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TOPOGRAPHY; WOUND HEALING;

CACO-2 CELLS; CELL ADHESION; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NANOWIRES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 79952005058     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.022     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ponchel G., Irache J. Specific and non-specific bioadhesive particulate systems for oral delivery to the gastrointestinal tract. Adv Drug Del Rev 1998, 34:191-219.
2. Sudhakar Y., Kuotsu K., Bandyopadhyay A.K. Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery - a promising option for orally less efficient drugs. J Control Release 2006, 114:15-40.
3. Lee J.W., Park J.H., Robinson J.R. Bioadhesive-based dosage forms: the next generation. J Pharm Sci 2000, 89(7):850-866.
4. Smart J.D. The basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. Adv Drug Del Rev 2005, 57:1556-1568.
5. Foraker A.B., Walczak R.J., Cohen M.H., Boiarski T.A., Grove C.F., Swaan P.W. Microfabricated porous silicon particles enhance paracellular delivery of insulin across intestinal caco-2 cell monolayers. Pharm Res 2003, 20(1):110-116.
6. Salonen J., Kaukonen A.M., Hirvonen J., Lehto V.-P. Mesoporous silicon in drug delivery applications. J Pharm Sci 2008, 97(2):632-653.
7. Mitragotri S. Recent developments in needle-free drug delivery. Bridge 2008, 38(4):5-12.
8. Cone R.A. Barrier properties of mucus. Adv Drug Del Rev 2009, 61(2):75-85.
9. Autumn K., Sitti M., Liange Y.A., Peattie A.M., Hansen W.R., Sponberg S., et al. Evidence for van der waals adhesion in gecko setae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:12252-12256.
10. Autumn K., Liange Y.A., Hsieh S.T., Zesch W., Chan W.P., Kenny T.W., et al. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature 2000, 405:681-685.
11. Spolenak R., Gorb S., Arzt E. Adhesion design maps for bio-inspired attachment systems. Acta Biomater 2005, 1:5-13.
12. Kumar V., Prud'homme R.K. Thermodynamic limits on drug loading in nanoparticle cores. J Pharm Sci 2008, 97(11):4904-4914.
13. Freitas S., Merkle H.P., Gander B. Microencapsulation by solvent extraction/evaporation: reviewing the state of the art of microsphere preparation process technology. J Control Release 2005, 102(2):313-332.
14. Fischer K.E., Aleman B.J., Tao S.L., Daniels R.H., Li E.M., Bunger M.D., et al. Biomimetic nanowire coatings for next generation adhesive drug delivery systems. Nano Lett 2009, 9(2):716-720.
15. Pinto M., Robine-Leon S., Appay M.D., Kedinger M., Triadou N., Dussaulx E., et al. Enterocyte-like differentiation and polarization of the human-colon carcinoma cell-line caco-2 in culture. Biol Cell 1983, 47:323-330.
16. Papra A., Gadegaard N., Larsen N.B. Characterization of ultrathin poly(ethylene glycol) monolayers on silicon substrates. Langmuir 2001, 17(5):1457-1460.
17. Cui Y., Lauhon L.J., Gudiksen M.S., Wang J., Lieber C.M. Diameter-controlled synthesis of single-crystal silicon nanowires. Appl Phys Lett 2001, 78(15):2214-2216.
18. Ainslie K.M., Tao S.L., Popat K.C., Daniels H., Hardev V., Grimes C.A., et al. In vitro inflammatory response of nanostructured titania, silicon oxide, and polycaprolactone. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2008, 91A(3):647-655.
19. Werner U., Kissel T. In-vitro cell culture models of the nasal epithelium: a comparative histochemical investigation of their suitability for drug transport studies. Pharm Res 1996, 13(7):978-988.
20. Gospodarowicz D., Moran J., Braun D., Birdwell C. Clonal growth of bovine vascular endothelial cells: fibroblast growth factor as a survival agent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1976, 73(11):4120-4124.
21. Autumn K., Dittmore A., Santos D., Spenko M., Cutkosky M. Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment. J Exp Biol 2006, 209:3569-3579.
22. Gratton S.E.A., Ropp P.A., Pohlhaus P.D., Luft J.C., Madden V.J., Napier M.E., et al. The effect of particle design on cellular internalization pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105(33):11613-11618.
23. Champion J., Mitragotri S. Shape induced inhibition of phagocytosis of polymer particles. Pharm Res 2009, 26(1):244-249.
24. Li S.-D., Huang L. Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of nanoparticles. Mol Pharm 2008, 5(4):496-504.
25. Verma A., Stellacci F. Effect of surface properties on nanoparticle-cell interactions. Small 2009, 6(1):12-21.
26. Weinbaum S., Guo P., You L. A new view of mechanotransduction and strain amplification in cells with microvilli and cell processes. Biorheology 2001, 38:119-142.
27. Gorelik J., Shevchuk A.I., Frolenkov G.I., Diakonov I.A., Lab M.J., Kros C.J., et al. Dynamic assembly of surface structures in living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100(10):5819-5822.
28. Sampath P., Pollard T.D. Effects of cytochalasin, phalloidin and ph on the elongation of actin filaments. Biochemistry 2002, 30(7):1973-1980.
29. Fu Y.-Y., Sibley E., Tang S.-C. Transient cytochalasin-d treatment induces apically administered raav2 across tight junctions for transduction of enterocytes. J Gen Virol 2008, 89(12):3004-3008.