Wear of denture teeth and their human enamel antagonists

Quintessence International

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 157-163

  Ghazal, Muhamad ^a,b   Kern, Matthias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALEPPO   (Syrian Arab Republic)

Author keywords

Ceramic teeth; Human enamel; Laser scanner; Nanofilled composite teeth; Resin teeth; SEM; Two body wear; Vickers hardness

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; ENAMEL; HARDNESS; HUMAN; LASER; MASTICATION; PATHOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL OCCLUSION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE DESIGN; HARDNESS; HUMANS; LASERS; MASTICATION; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; TOOTH WEAR; TOOTH, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 79951975689     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kim SK, Kim KN, Chang IT, Heo SJ. A study of the effects of chewing patterns on occlusal wear. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28: 1048-1055.
2. Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Bush PJ, Cohen RE. Tooth wear: Attrition, erosion, and abrasion. Quintessence Int 2003;34: 435-446.
3. Ekfeldt A, Karlsson S. Changes of masticatory movement characteristics after prosthodontic rehabilitation of individuals with extensive tooth wear. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9: 539-546.
4. Oh WS, Delong R, Anusavice KJ. Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87: 451-459.
5. Ghazal M, Yang B, Ludwig K, Kern M.Two-body wear of resin and ceramic denture teeth in comparison to human enamel.Dent Mater 2008;24: 502-507.
6. Zeng J, Sato Y, Ohkubo C, Hosoi T. In vitro wear resistance of three types of composite resin denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94: 453-457.
7. Ogle RE, Davis EL. Clinical wear study of three commercially available artificial tooth materials: Thirtysix month results. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79: 145-151.
8. Suzuki S. In vitro wear of nano-composite denture teeth. J Prosthodont 2004;13: 238-243.
9. Stober T, Lutz T, Gilde H, Rammelsberg P. Wear of resin denture teeth by two-body contact. Dent Mater 2006;22: 243-249.
10. Ghazal M, Steiner M, Kern M.Wear resistance of artificial denture teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21: 166-168.
11. Ramp LC, Broome JC, Ramp MH.Hardness and wear resistance of two resin composites cured with equivalent radiant exposure from a low irradiance LED and QTH light-curing units.Am J Dent 2006;19: 31-36.
12. Say EC, Civelek A, Nobecourt A, Ersoy M, Guleryuz C. Wear and microhardness of different resin composite materials. Oper Dent 2003;28: 628-634.
13. Heintze SD.How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent Mater 2006;22: 712-734.
14. Kern M, Strub JR, Lu XY. Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual-axis chewing simulator. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26: 372-378.
15. Elmaria A, Goldstein G, Vijayaraghavan T, Legeros RZ, Hittelman EL. An evaluation of wear when enamel is opposed by various ceramic materials and gold. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96: 345-353.
16. Suzuki S. Simulated enamel wear during occlusal contact. Am J Dent 2004;17: 373-377.
17. O'Kray HP, O'Brien WJ. In vitro human enamel wear by a hydrated high-alkali porcelain. Quintessence Int 2005;36: 617-622.
18. Matsumura H, Leinfelder KF.Three-body wear of four types of light-activated composite resin veneering materials.Quintessence Int 1994;25: 425-430.
19. Lambrechts P, Debels E, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. How to simulate wear? Overview of existing methods.Dent Mater 2006;22: 693-701.
20. Chadwick RG. Thermocycling-The effects upon the compressive strength and abrasion resistance of three composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 1994;21: 533-543.
21. DeLong R. Intra-oral restorative materials wear: Rethinking the current approaches: How to measure wear.Dent Mater 2006;22: 702-711.
22. Krejci I, Albert P, Lutz F. The influence of antagonist standardization on wear. J Dent Res 1999;78: 713-719.
23. Kramer N, Kunzelmann KH, Taschner M, Mehl A, Garcia-Godoy F, Frankenberger R.Antagonist enamel wears more than ceramic inlays. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 1097-1100.
24. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M, Heinzmann JL. Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69: 425-430.
25. Hassan R, Caputo AA, Bunshah RF. Fracture toughness of human enamel.J Dent Res 1981;60: 820-827.
26. Morena R, Lockwood PE, Fairhurst CW. Fracture toughness of commercial dental porcelains. Dent Mater 1986;2: 58-62.
27. Rizkalla AS, Jones DW. Indentation fracture toughness and dynamic elastic moduli for commercial feldspathic dental porcelain materials. Dent Mater 2004;20: 198-206.
28. Schuh C, Kinast EJ, Mezzomo E, Kapczinski MP.Effect of glazed and polished surface finishes on the friction coefficient of two low-fusing ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93: 245-252.
29. Hirano S, May KB, Wagner WC, Hacker CH. In vitro wear of resin denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 152-155.
30. Suzuki S, Suzuki SH, Cox CF. Evaluating the antagonistic wear of restorative materials when placed against human enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127: 74-80.
31. Coffey JP, Goodkind RJ, DeLong R, Douglas WH. In vitro study of the wear characteristics of natural and artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54: 273-280.