Indentation fracture toughness and dynamic elastic moduli for commercial feldspathic dental porcelain materials

Dental Materials

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 198-206

  Rizkalla, Amin S ^a   Jones, Derek W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dynamic elastic modulus; Feldspathic; Fracture toughness; Porcelain; True hardness

Indexed keywords

DENSITY (SPECIFIC GRAVITY); ELASTIC MODULI; FRACTURE TOUGHNESS; HARDNESS; POISSON RATIO; PORCELAIN; STATISTICAL METHODS; ULTRASONIC TESTING;

DYNAMIC ELASTIC MODULUS; GLASS-RESIN COMPOSITES;

DENTAL MATERIALS;

ALUMINUM SILICATE; FELDSPAR; POTASSIUM DERIVATIVE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; ELASTICITY; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ULTRASOUND;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; POTASSIUM COMPOUNDS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 0346279965     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00092-7     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Kingery W.D., Bowen H.K., Uhlmann D.R. Introduction to ceramics. 2nd ed:1976;Wiley, New York. [chapter 15].
2. Jones D.W. The strength and strengthening mechanism of dental ceramics. McLean J. Dental Ceramic proceedings of the first international symposium on ceramics. 1985;83-141 Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc.
3. Streicher R.M., Semlitsch M., Schön R. Articulation of ceramic surfaces against polyethylene. Ravaglioli A., Krjewski A. Bioceramics and the human body. 1991;118-123 Elsevier, New York.
4. Stafford G.D., Huggett R., Causton B.E. Fracture toughness and denture base acrylics. J Biomed Mater Res. 14:1980;359-371.
5. Cruckshank-Boyd D.W., Roswati N. A comparison of fracture toughness testing methods for dental amalgam. J Dent Res. 60:1981;1168. Abstract 34.
6. Goldman M. Fracture properties of composite and glass ionomer dental restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res. 19:1985;771-783.
7. Hassan R., Caputo A.A., Bunshash R.F. Fracture toughness of human enamel. J Dent Res. 60:1981;820-827.
8. El Mowafy O.M., Watts D.C. Fracture toughness of human dentine. J Dent Res. 65:1986;677-681.
9. Morena R., Lockwood P.E., Fairhurst C.W. Fracture toughness of commercial dental porcelains. Dent Mater. 2:1986;58-62.
10. Bittence J.C. Guide to engineered materials, advanced materials and processes and metal progress 1(1). 1986;American Society for Metals, Metal Park.
11. Babikov OI, Ultrasonics and its industrial applications. New York: Russian Publishers, Consultants Bureau, 1960; [chapter 5]. p 123.
12. Jones D.W., Rizkalla A.S., Sutow E.J. Indentation fracture toughness and dynamic Young's modulus of ceramic biomaterials. Mater Sci Engng. A105/106:1988;207-213.
13. Jones DW, Rizkalla AS. Fracture toughness of bioglass™/ceramic systems. Bioceramic materials and applications II. In: Rusin RP, Fishman GS, editors. Ceramic Transactions 1995;63:87-91.
14. Li Z., Ghosh A., Kobayashi A.S., Bradt R.C. Indentation fracture toughness of sintered carbide in the Palmqvist crack regime. J Am Ceram Soc. 72:(6):1989;904-911.
15. 2 glasses. Br Ceram Trans. 95:(6):1996;250-253.
16. Rizkalla A.S., Jones D.W., Miller R.P. Evaluation of indentation fracture toughness methods for glass biomaterials. Br Ceram Trans J. 95:(4):1996;151-156.
17. Rizkalla A.S., Jones D.W., Archibalt T., Hall G.C., Langman M. Elastic modulus of experimental bioactive glass composites. Bioceramics. vol. 12:1999;World Scientific, Singapore. p. 445-8.
18. 3 and their effects on mechanical properties. DSc Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1979.
19. Rizkalla A.S., Jones D.W., Sutow E.J. Effect of nonbridging oxygens on the fracture toughness of synthesized glasses. Br Ceram Trans J. 91:1992;12-15.