Consumer impact of animal welfare regulation in the California poultry industry

Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 424-442

  Allender, William J ^a,b   Richards, Timothy J ^a,b  

^a Agribusiness and Resource Management ^*  (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal welfare regulation; California poultry; Egg prices; Egg supply; Hen housing; Mixed logit; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 79951905352     PISSN: 10685502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allender, W. J., and T. J. Richards. "Market Diversion and Market Power: California Eggs." Rev. Indust. Org. 38(2010): 37-58.
2. American Egg Board. "Home of the Incredible Edible Egg." AEB, Park Ridge, IL, 2008. Online. Available at http://www.aeb.org/. [Accessed September 29, 2010.]
3. Andersen, L. M. "Animal Welfare and Eggs-Cheap Talk of Money on the Counter?" Work, pap., AKF, Danish Institute of Governmental Research, 2008.
4. Appleby, M. C., J. A. Mench, and B. O. Hughes. Poultry Behaviour and Welfare. Cambridge, MA: CABI Publishing, 2004.
5. Bell, D. D., and W. D. Weaver. Commercial Chicken Meat and Egg Production, 5th ed. New York: Springer Publishing, 2002.
6. Bennett, R. M. "Farm Animal Welfare and Food Policy." Food Policy 22(1997): 281-288.
7. Bhat, C. R. "Simulation Estimation of Mixed Discrete Choice Models Using Randomized and Scrambled Halton Sequences." Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 37(2003): 837-855. (Pubitemid 36901454)
8. Bucklin, R. E., and S. Gupta. "Brand Choice, Purchase Incidence, and Segmentation: An Integrated Modeling Approach." J. Marketing Res. 29(1992): 201-215.
9. California State Senate. "Assembly Bill No. 1437." [Last modified July 6, 2010.] Online. Available at http:// leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/ bill/asm/ab-1401-1450/ab-1437-bill-20100706-chaptered.pdf.
10. Chintagunta, P. K. "Investigating Category Pricing Behavior at a Retail Chain." J. Marketing Res. 39(2002): 141-154.
11. Chintagunta, P. K., E. Kyriaziduo, and J. Perktold. "Panel Data Analysis of Household Brand Choices." J. Econometrics 103(2001): 11-153.
12. Erdem, T. "A Dynamic Analysis of Market Structure Based on Panel Data." Marketing Sci. 4(1996): 359-378.
13. Honoré, B. E., and E. Kyriazidou. "Panel Data Discrete Choice Models with Lagged Dependent Variables." Econometrica 68(2000): 839-874.
14. Hosken, D., and D. Reiffen. "Multiproduct Retailers and the Sale Phenomenon." Agribus.: An Internat. J. 17(2001): 15-137.
15. List, J. A., and C. A. Gallet. "What Experimental Protocols Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?" Environ, and Resour. Econ. 20(2001): 214-254.
16. Lusk, J. L. "The Effect of Proposition 2 on the Demand for Eggs in California." J. Agr. and Food Indust. Org. 8(2010): Article3.
17. MacDonald, J. M. "Demand, Information, and Competition: Why Do Food Prices Fall at Seasonal Demand Peaks?" J. Indust. Econ. 48(2000): 27-45.
18. McFadden, D. L., and K. Train. "Mixed MNL Models for Discrete Response." J. Appl. Econometrics 15(2000): 447-470.
19. National Hog Farmer. "California's Proposition 2 Passes by Wide Majority." [Last modified November 5, 2008.] Online. Available at http://nationalhogfarmer.com/behavior-welfare/news/1105-california-proposition2/ .
20. Nevo, A. "A Practitioner's Guide to Estimation of Random-Coefficients Logit Models of Demand." J. Econ. and Mgmt. Strategy 9(2001): 513-548.
21. Rahn, A. P. "Caged Laying Hen Weil-Being: An Economic Perspective." Work, pap., Dept. of Animal Sci. and Agr. Econ., Michigan State University, 2001.
22. Richards, T. J. "A Nested Logit Model of Strategic Promotion." Quant. Marketing and Econ. 6(2007): 63-91.
23. Richards, T. J., P. M. Patterson, and A. Tegene. "Obesity and Nutrient Consumption: A Rational Addiction?" Contemp. Econ. Policy 25(2007): 309-324.
24. Roy, R., P. K. Chintagunta, and S. Haldar. "A Framework for Investigating Habits, 'the Hand of the Past,' and Heterogeneity in Dynamic Brand Choice." Marketing Sci. 15(1996): 280-299.
25. Seetharaman, P. B. "Modeling Multiple Sources of State Dependence in Random Utility Models: A Distributed Lag Approach." Marketing Sci. 23(2004): 263-271.
26. Smith, R. "Eggs: What We Buy, Pay, Want." Feedstuffs 82(2010). Online. Available at http://www.feedstuffs. com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm= &type=Publishing&mod=Publications%3A%3AArticle&mid=AA01E1 C62E954234AA0052ECD5818EF4&tier=4&id=11D20F02341340BCBA329ADD94CA0136.
27. Sumner, D. A., J. T. Rosen-Molina, and W. A. Matthews. "Economic Effects of Proposed Restrictions on Egg-Laying Hen Housing in California." Work, pap., Agricultural Issues Center, University of California, Davis, 2008.
28. Thunström, L. "Preference Heterogeneity and Habit Persistence: The Case of Breakfast Cereal Consumption." Work. Pap. No. 738, Umeå U. SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
29. Train,K.E." RecreationDemandModelswithTasteDifferencesoverPeople"LandEcon.74(1998): 230-239.(Pubitemid28437633)
30. -. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
31. U.S. Department of Agriculture. "2007 Census of Agriculture Report, State Profile: California." USDA, Washington, DC, 2007. Online. Available at http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Online- Highlights/County- Profiles/index.asp. [Accessed September 29, 2010.]