Regulation of digital businesses with natural monopolies or third-party payment business models: Antitrust lessons from the analysis of google

Journal of Management Information Systems

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 43-80

  Clemons, Eric K ^a   Madhani, Nehal ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

antitrust; bundling and tying; contestability; deterred market entry; digital business strategies; essential facilities doctrine; Google; key word auctions; online search; relevant market share; sponsored search

Indexed keywords

ANTITRUST; BUNDLING AND TYING; CONTESTABILITY; DETERRED MARKET ENTRY; DIGITAL BUSINESS STRATEGIES; ESSENTIAL FACILITIES DOCTRINE; GOOGLE; KEY WORD AUCTIONS; ONLINE SEARCH; RELEVANT MARKET SHARE; SPONSORED SEARCHES;

COMMERCE; COMPETITION; ECONOMICS; ONLINE SEARCHING; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

EID: 79951879363     PISSN: 07421222     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222270303     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. U.S.c. § 1125(a) (2009).
2. AD/SAT, a Division of Skylight, Inc. v. Associated Press. 181 F.3d 216 (1999).
3. American Ad Management, Inc. v. General Tel. Co. 190 F.3d 1051 (9th cir. 1999).
4. Areeda, P., and Hovenkamp, H. Antitrust Law (Supp. 1993). Boston: Wolters Kluwer law & Business, 2008.
5. Areeda, P., and Turner, D. Predatory pricing and related practices under section 2 of the Sherman act. Harvard Law Review, 88 (February 1975), 697-733.
6. Areeda, P., and Turner, D. Antitrust Law. Boston: aspen law & Business, Supp. 1988
7. Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. 472 U.S. 585 (1985).
8. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of Car-penters. 459 U.S. 519 (1983)
9. Atlantic Richfeld Co. v. USA Petroleum Co. 495 U.S. 328 (1990).
10. Bathurst, B. The Wreckers: A Story of Killing Seas, False Lights, and Plundered Ship-wrecks. Boston: houghton Miffin, 2005.
11. Baumol, W.J. contestable markets: an uprising in the theory of industry structure. American Economic Review 72, 1 (March 1982) 1-15.
12. Baumol, W.J.; Panzar, J.C.; and Willig, R.D. Contestable Markets and The Theory of Industry Structure. New York: harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982.
13. Baumol, W.J.; Panzar, C.J.; and Willig, R.D. On the theory of perfectly contestable markets. In J.E. Stiglitz and G.F. Mathewson (eds.), New Developments in the Analysis of Market Structure. cambridge: MIT Press, 1986, pp. 339-365
14. A brief history: The Bell system. aT&T, 2010 (available at www.corp.att.com/history/history3.html)
15. Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. 509 U.S. 209 (1992).
16. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc. 429 U.S. 477 (1977).
17. Burns, G. Google Inc. treads carefully around antitrust bear trap. Chicago Tribune Blog (November 12, 2009) (available at http://newsblogs. chicagotribune.com/burns-on-business/2009/11/google-inc-treads-carefully-around- antitrust-bear-trap.html).
18. Burns, G. Google vs. the professor: a Wharton antitrust smackdown. Chicago Tribune Blog (November 30, 2009) (available at http://newsblogs. chicagotribune.com/burns-on-business/2009/11/google-vs-the-professor-a-wharton- antitrust-smackdown.html).
19. Bylund, A. how free services make Google rich. Motley Fool (November 20, 2009) (available at www.fool.com/investing/high-growth/2009/11/20/how-free- services-make-google-rich.aspx)
20. Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc. 479 U.S. 104 (1986).
21. CBC Companies, Inc. v. Equifax, Inc. 561 F.3d 569 (6th cir. 2009).
22. Cheng, J. Google search share drops as Bing gains momentum. Ars Technica (august 3, 2009) (available at http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/08/ bing-continues-to-chip-away-at-googles-search-share.ars/).
23. Clark, A. Google faces anti-monopoly probe by European commission. Guardian (February 24, 2010), 21.
24. Clemons, E.K. Mac\Philadelphia National Bank's strategic venture in shared aTM networks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7, 1 (Summer 1990), 5-25.
25. Clemons, E.K. Gauging the power play in the new economy. Financial Times (June 13, 2000), 2-4.
26. Clemons, E.K. Business models for monetizing the Internet: Surely there must be some-thing other than advertising. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 2 (Fall 2009), 15-41.
27. Clemons, E.K. From media to milieu and from ad revenues to rents: The complex prob-lem of monetizing online social networks. Decision Support Systems, 48, 1 (December 2009), 46-56.
28. Clemons, E.K. What an anti-trust case against Google might look like. TechCrunch.com (March 1, 2009) (available at http://techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/ what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/).
29. Clemons, E.K. The power of patterns and pattern recognition when developing information-based strategy. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 1 (Summer 2010), 69-96.
30. Clemons, E.K., and Kleindorfer, P.R. an economic analysis of interorganizational informa-tion technology. Decision Support Systems, 8, 5 (September 1992), 431-447.
31. Clemons, E.K., and Row, M.C. McKesson Drug company: a case study of Economost\a strategic information system. Journal of Management Information Systems, 5, 1 (Summer 1988), 36-50.
32. Clemons, E.K., and Thatcher, M.E. capital One Financial and a decade of experience with newly vulnerable markets: Some propositions concerning the competitive advantage of new entrants. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17, 3 (September 2008), 179-189.
33. Clemons, E.K., and Weber, B.W. london's big bang: a case study of information tech-nology, competitive impact, and organizational change. Journal of Management Informa tion Systems, 6, 4 (Spring 1990), 41-60.
34. Clemons, E.K.; Barnett, S.; Gokal, R.; Hu, K.; and Madhani, N. Self-regulating public servant, proftable Internet innovator, or rapacious monopoly: assessing Google, thinking about the possibility of regulation. In R.H. Sprague (ed.), Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. los alamitos, ca: IEEE computer Society Press, 2010.
35. Complaint American Airlines, Inc., v. Google, Inc. No. 4:2007cv00487 (N.D. Tex. Filed august 16, 2007).
36. Copeland, D., and McKenney, J. airline reservations systems: lessons from history. MIS Quarterly, 12, 3 (September 1988), 353-370.
37. Cotter, T.F. The essential facilities doctrine. In K.N. hylton (ed.), Antitrust Law and Economics. cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2009, pp. 147-183.
38. Dellarocas, C. The digitization of word-of-mouth: Promise and challenges of online repu tation systems. Management Science, 49, 10 (2003), 1407-1424.
39. Dellarocas, C., and Viswanathan, S. The holy grail of advertising: allocative effciency and revenue implications of "pay-per-action" advertising in environments with quality uncertainty Paper presented at the Workshop on Information Systems Economics, Montreal, December 2007 (available at http://research.yahoo.com/workshops/ad-auctions-2008/pdf/paper-4.pdf).
40. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc., 504 U.S. 451 (1992).
41. Estee Lauder, Inc., v. The Gap, Inc., 108 F.3d 1503 (2d cir.1997).
42. Fisherman V. Estate of Wirtz, 807 F.2d 520 (7th cir. 1986).
43. Frank, R.H., and Cook, P.J. The Winner-Take-All Society: Why the Few at the Top Get So Much More. New York: Free Press, 1995.
44. Frommer, D. Google's free GPS service crushes Garmin, TomTom Shares. Business Insider (October 28, 2009) (www.businessinsider.com/googles-free-gps- service-crushes-garmin-tomtom-shares-2009-10/).
45. Garner, R. Google ups share of search to 72%; Yahoo, MSN and ask continue to tank. Search Insider (March 11, 2009) (available at www.mediapost.com/ publications/?fa=articles.showarticle&art-aid=101971/).
46. Google Inc. United States Securities and Exchange commission, form 10-K for the fscal year ended December 31, 2008. Mountain View, ca, 2008 (available at www.sec.gov/archives/edgar/data/1288776/000119312509029448/d10k.htm).
47. Hagiu, A., and Yoffe, D.B. What's your Google strategy? Harvard Business Review, 87, 4 (april 2009), 74-91.
48. HDC Medical, Inc., v. Minntech Corp. 411 F.Supp.2d 1096 (D.Minn. 2006) (citing SmithKline Corp. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 575 F.2d 1056, 1063 (3d cir. 1978)).
49. Heiner, D. competition authorities and search. Microsoft on the Issues. (February 6, 2010) available at: http://blogs.technet.com/b/microsoft-on-the- issues/archive/2010/02/26/competition-authorities-and-search.aspx).
50. Helft, M. Google's free phone manager could threaten a variety of services. New York Times (March 12, 2009), B9.
51. Horwitz, J. Google says it's actually quite small. Washington Post (June 7, 2009), G1.
52. Knevelbaard Dairies v. Kraft Foods, Inc. 232 F.3d 979 (9th cir. 2000).
53. Krazit, T. Rescuecom drops trademark suit against Google. CNET News (March 5, 2010) (available at http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684-3-10464634-265. html).
54. Lacy, S. Online ads: Even the evangelists turning bearish. TechCrunch.com (February 25, 2009) (available at www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/25/online-ads- even-the-evangelists-turning-bearish/).
55. Lanier, J. You Are Not a Gadget: A Manifesto. New York: alfred a. Knopf, 2010.
56. LePage's Inc. v. 3M. 324 F.3d 141 (3d cir. 2003).
57. Liedtke, M. Google's lobbying costs eclipse $1 million in Q3. huffngton Post (November 4, 2009) (available at www.huffngtonpost.com/tag/ google-lobbying/).
58. Lohr, S., and Helft, M. New mood in antitrust may affect Google. New York Times (May 18, 2009), B1-B2
59. MCI Communications Corp. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co. 708 F.2d 1081 (7th cir. 1983).
60. Mills, E. Google loses French trademark lawsuit. CNET News (June 28, 2007) (available at http://news.cnet.com/2100-1030-3-6089307.html).
61. Pacifc Bell Telephone Co. v. Linkline Communications, Inc. 129 S.ct. 1109 (2009).
62. Perez-Pena, R. as cities go from two papers to one, talk of zero. New York Times (March 12, 2009), a1
63. Rebel Oil Co. v. Atlantic Richfeld Co. 51 F.3d 1421 (9th cir. 1995).
64. Rescuecom Corp. v. Google, Inc. 562 F.3d 123 (2d cir. 2009).
65. Rosencrance, L. E-commerce leaders move to fght deceptive online ads: The al-liance against Bait & click is focused on keyword advertising. ComputerWorld (august 2008) (available at http://computerworld.com/s/article/ 9111682/E-commerce-leaders-move-to-fght-deceptive-online-ads/).
66. Rowley, J. antitrust pick Varney saw Google as next Microsoft. Bloomberg.com (February 17, 2009) (available at www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid= newsarchive&sid=aG9B5.J3Bl1w/).
67. Sanford, B.W., and Brown, B.D. laws that could save journalism. Washington Post (May 16, 2009), a15.
68. Schmalensee, R. Standards for dominant frm conduct: What can economics contribute? In D. hay and J. Vickers (eds.), The Economics of Market Dominance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987, pp. 61-88.
69. Schonfeld, E. Bing is growing faster than ever, keeps gaining search market share. TechCrunch.com (January 15, 2010) (available at techcrunch.com/2010/01/15/bing-search-market-share-december-2009/).
70. Steel, E. Google search ads rile its big customers. Wall Street Journal (June 3, 2008), B1.
71. Stross, R. Everyone loves Google, until it's too big. New York Times (February 21, 2009), BU3.
72. Sullivan, D. Deconstructing Google: after the Google antitrust breakup. SearchEngineland (December 30 2007) available at http://searchengineland.com/ deconstructing-google-chapter-4-after-the-google-antitrust-breakup-13026/).
73. Tait, N. Google wins key adWords victory. Financial Times (March 23, 2010) (available at www.ft.com/cms/s/2/f8bf6d48-365c-11df-8151-00144feabdc0. html)
74. Todorov v. DCH Healthcare Authority. 921 F.2d 1438 (11th cir.1991).
75. TradeComet.Com LLC v. Google, Inc. No. 1:2009cv01400 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
76. Transcript of cross examination of richard Schmalensee, January 13, at 1-65, United States v. Microsoft Corp., 97 F.Supp.2d 59 (D.D.c. 2000).
77. United Air Lines, Inc., v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 766 F.2d 1107 (7th cir. 1985).
78. United States. v. Aluminum Co. of America, 148 F.2d 416 (1945)
79. United States v. E.I. DuPont, 351 U.S. 377 (1956).
80. United States v. Grinnell Corp., 384 U.S. 563 (1966).
81. United States v. Microsoft Corp., 84 F. Supp. 2d 9 (D.D.c. 1999).
82. United States v. Microsoft Corp. No. 98-1232 TPJ (D.D.c. November 5 1999), Find-ings of Fact at ¶ 387.
83. United States v Microsoft Corp., 87 F Supp 2d 30 (D.D.c. 2000).
84. United States v. Microsoft Corp., 253 F.3d 34 (D.c. cir. 2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 952 (2001).
85. United States v. Times-Picayune Publishing Co., 345 U.S. 594 (1953).
86. United States court of appeals for the Second circuit, 06-4881-cv, Rescuecom v. Google available at: www.scribd.com/doc/13927222/rescuecom-v- Google-040309/).
87. Varian, H. 2007. Position auctions. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25, 6 (December 2007), 1163-1178.
88. Verizon Communications, Inc., v. Law Offces of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP, 540 U.S. 398 (2004).
89. Weber, T.A., and Zheng, E. A model of search intermediaries and paid referrals. Informa-tion Systems Research. 18, 4 (December 2007), 414-436.
90. Weitzman, H. Sun-Times joins ranks of chapter 11 publishers. Financial Times (april 1, 2009), 17
91. What is Google's trademark policy for resellers and informational sites? Google adWords, 2010 (available at http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/ answer.py?hl=en&answer=145626/).
92. Yahoo Finance. Key Statistics, entries for Google (GOOG). (February 8, 2010) (available at http://fnance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=GOOG+Key+Statistics/).
93. Yahoo Finance. Key Statistics, entries for Yahoo (YhOO). (February 8, 2010) (available at http://fnance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=YhOO+Key+Statistics/).