Subsyllabic structure reflected in letter confusability effects in Korean word recognition

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 129-134

  Lee, Chang H ^a   Taft, Marcus ^b  

^a Sogang University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Letter position; Processing hangul; Reading korean; Transposed letter effect

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; SOUTH KOREA;

ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; LANGUAGE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; SEMANTICS;

EID: 79951851310     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-010-0028-y     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Coltheart, M., Besner, D., Jonasson, J. T., & Davelaar, E. (1979). Phonological encoding in the lexical decision task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 489-507.
2. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A Dual Route Cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
3. Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713-758.
4. Davis, M. (2003). Personal web page via the Cognition & Brain Sciences Institute, University of Cambridge. Retrieved from: www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/people/matt.davis/Cmabrigde/
5. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2002). DMDX display software. Retrieved from: www.u.arizona.edu/~kforster/dmdx/dmdx.htm
6. Gómez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577-601.
7. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
8. Johnson, N. F., & Pugh, K. R. (1994). A cohort model of visual word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 240-346.
9. Korean Word Database (2001). 21th century Sejong Project Corpus. The National Institute of the Korean Language, Seoul: Korea
10. Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2009). Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 530-542.
11. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
12. Perea, M., abu Mallouh, R., & Carreiras, M. (2010). The search for an input coding scheme: Transposed letter priming in Arabic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 375-380.
13. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with non-adjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246.
14. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
15. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
16. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607-620.
17. Taft, M., Zhu, X., & Peng, D. (1999). Positional specificity of radicals in Chinese character recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 498-519.
18. Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2007). Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: Impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 913-918.
19. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221-243.