Semantic priming is affected by real-time phonological competition: Evidence for continuous cascading systems

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 141-149

  Apfelbaum, Keith S ^a   Blumstein, Sheila E ^b   Mcmurray, Bob ^a  

^a University of Iowa   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Lexical competition; Neighborhood density; Semantic priming; Spoken word recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CUES; DECISION MAKING; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; SACCADES; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 79951828012     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-010-0039-8     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(4), 419-439.
2. Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2004).Continuousmappingfromsoundto meaning in spoken-language comprehension: Immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30(2), 493-513.
3. Fellbaum, C. (Ed.). (1998). WordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge: MIT Press.
4. Forster, K. I. (1981).Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33(A), 465-495.
5. Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1997). Integrating form and meaning: A distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 613-656.
6. Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1999). Ambiguity, competition, and blending in spoken word recognition. Cognitive Science, 23, 439-462.
7. Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2005). Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition, 96, B23-B32.
8. Joanisse, M. F., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1998). Specific language impairment: A deficit in grammar or processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(7), 240-247.
9. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
10. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
11. Levy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T., & Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(50), 21086-21090.
12. Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19(1), 1-36.
13. Magnuson, J., McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M., & Aslin, R. (2003). Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: The ghost of Christmash past. Cognitive Science, 27(2), 285-298.
14. Magnuson, J. S., Dixon, J. A., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2007). The dynamics of lexical competition during spoken word recognition. Cognitive Science, 31(1), 133-156.
15. Magnuson, J. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Aslin, R. N., & Dahan, D. (2003). The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: Studies with artificial lexicons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(2), 202-227.
16. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 148-172). Cambridge: MIT Press.
17. Matin, E., Shao, K. C., & Boff, K. R. (1993). Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades. Perception and Psychophysics, 53(4), 372-380.
18. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
19. McMurray, B., Clayards, M., Tanenhaus, M., & Aslin, R. (2008). Tracking the timecourse of phonetic cue integration during spoken word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15 (6), 1064-1071.
20. McMurray, B., Samelson, V., Lee, S., & Tomblin, J. B. (2010). Eyemovements reveal the time-course of online spoken word recognition language impaired and normal adolescents. Cognitive Psychology, 60(1), 1-39.
21. McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. Cognition, 86(2), B33-B42.
22. Miller, J., Patterson, T., & Ulrich, R. (1998). Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology, 35(1), 99-115.
23. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/
24. Pederson, T., Patwardhan, S., & Michelizzi, J. (2004). Word Net: similarity - measuring the relatedness of concepts. Proceedings of the the Fifth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 38-41.
25. Revill, K. P., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2008). Context and spoken word recognition in a novel lexicon. Journal ofexperimental psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 34 (5), 1207-1223.
26. Sweeney, C., Blumstein, S. E., & Apfelbaum, K. S. (2009). The neural bases of phonological competition: Evidence from aphasia. Boston, MA: Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Aphasia.
27. Tanenhaus, M. K., Carlson, G. N., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Do listeners compute linguistic representations? In D. R. Dowty, L. Kartunnen, & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing: Psycholinguistic, theoretical and computational perspectives (pp. 359-408). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632-1634.
29. Yee, E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2006). Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1-14.
30. Yee, E., Blumstein, S. E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2008). Lexical-semantic activation in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(4), 592-612.
31. Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic content in spoken-word processing. Cognition, 32(1), 25-64.