The role of online visual feedback for the control of target-directed and allocentric hand movements

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 105, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 846-859

  Thaler, Lore ^a   Goodale, Melvyn A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; ONLINE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

ADULT; BIOFEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGY; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT; ONLINE SYSTEMS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 79951818076     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00743.2010     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Atkeson CG, Hollerbach JM. Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. J Neurosci 5: 2318-2330, 1985. (Pubitemid 15226922)
2. Bock O. Contribution of retinal versus extraretinal signals towards visual localization in goal-directed movements. Exp Brain Res 64: 476-482, 1986. (Pubitemid 17024058)
3. Brown LE, Rosenbaum DA, Sainburg RL. Limb position drift: implications for control of posture and movement. J Neurophys 90: 3105-3118, 2003. (Pubitemid 37430008)
4. Burge JM, Ernst MO, Banks MS. The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching. J Vis 8: 1-19, 2008.
5. Byrne PA, Crawford JD. Cue reliability and a landmark stability heuristic determine relative weighting between egocentric and allocentric visual information in memory-guided reach. J Neurophysiol 103: 3054-3069, 2010.
6. de Grave DDJ, Brenner E, Smeets JBJ. Illusions as a tool to study the coding of pointing movements. Exp Brain Res 155: 56-62, 2004. (Pubitemid 38315313)
7. Desmurget M, Pelisson D, Rossetti Y, Prablanc C. From eye to hand: planning goal-directed movements. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22: 761-788, 1998. (Pubitemid 28493448)
8. Diedrichsen J, Shadmehr R, Ivry RB. The coordination of movement: optimal feedback control and beyond. Trends Cog Sci 14: 31-39, 2010.
9. DiZio P, Lackner JR. Motor adaptation to coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm. J Neurophysiol 74: 1787-1792, 1995.
10. Faisal AA, Wolpert DM. Near optimal combination of sensory and motor uncertainty in time during a naturalistic perception-action task. J Neurophysiol 101: 1901-1912, 2009.
11. Fisher NI. Statistical Analysis of Circular Data. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993.
12. Filimon F, Nelson JD, Huang RS, Sereno MI. Multiple parietal reach regions in humans: cortical representations for visual and proprioceptive feedback during on-line reaching. J Neurosci 29: 2961-2971, 2009.
13. Ghez C, Scheidt R, Heijink H. Different learned coordinate frames for planning trajectories and final positions in reaching. J Neurophysiol 98: 3614-3626, 2007.
14. Goodale MA, Milner AD. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15: 20-25, 1992.
15. Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Accuracy of planar reaching movements. I. Independence of direction and extent variability. Exp Brain Res 99: 97-111, 1994. (Pubitemid 24169580)
16. Gottlieb GL. On the voluntary movement of compliant (inertialviscoelastic) loads by parcellated control mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 76: 3207-3229, 1996. (Pubitemid 26378095)
17. Henriques DYP, Klier EM, Smith MA, Lowey D, Crawford JD. Gaze-centered re-mapping of remembered visual space in an open-loop pointing task. J Neurosci 18: 1583-1594, 1998. (Pubitemid 28082439)
18. Hirayama M, Kawato M, Jordan MI. The cascade neural network model and a speed-accuracy trade-off of arm movement. J Mot Behav 25: 162-174, 1993.
19. Izawa J, Shadmehr R. Online processing of uncertain information in visuomotor control. J Neurosci 28: 11360-11368, 2008.
20. Koerding KP, Wolpert DM. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 427: 244-247, 2004. (Pubitemid 38112039)
21. Kording KL, Wolpert DM. Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. Trends Cog Sci 10: 319-326, 2006. (Pubitemid 44094227)
22. Lackner JR, DiZio P. Rapid adaptation to coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J Neurophysiol 72: 299-313, 1994.
23. Lackner JR, DiZio P. Gravito inertial force background level affects adaptation to coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements. J Neurophysiol 80: 546-553, 1998. (Pubitemid 28387640)
24. Liu D, Todorov E. Evidence for the flexible sensorimotor strategies predicted by optimal feedback control. J Neurosci 27: 9354-9368, 2007. (Pubitemid 47358214)
25. Loftus A, Servos P, Goodale MA, Mendarozqueta N, Mon-Williams M. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance. Exp Brain Res 158: 317-327, 2004. (Pubitemid 39304297)
26. McGuire LMM, Sabes PN. Sensory transformations and the use of multiple reference frames for reach planning. Nat Neurosci 12: 1056-1061, 2009.
27. Milner AD, Goodale MA. Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 46: 774-785, 2008. (Pubitemid 351255549)
28. Ogawa K, Inui T, Sugio T. Separating brain regions involved in internally guided and visual feedback control of moving effectors: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 32: 1760-1770, 2006. (Pubitemid 44332278)
29. Pick HL, Warren DH, Hay JC. Sensory conflict in judgments of spatial direction. Percept Psychophys 6: 203-205, 1969.
30. Pisella L, Gréa H, Tilikete C, Vighetto A, Desmurget M, Rode G, Boisson D, Rossetti Y. An "automatic pilot" for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nat Neurosci 3: 729-736, 2000. (Pubitemid 30437209)
31. Rock I. The Nature of Perceptual Adaptation. New York: Basic, 1966.
32. Sainburg RL, Ghez C, Kalakanis D. Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 81: 1040-1056, 1999.
33. Sainburg RL, Wang J. Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information. Exp Brain Res 145: 437-447, 2002. (Pubitemid 34994786)
34. Sarlegna FR, Sainburg RL. The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance. Exp Brain Res 176: 267-280, 2007. (Pubitemid 44837102)
35. Saunders J, Knill DC. Visual feedback control of hand movements, J Neurosci 24: 3223-3234, 2004.
36. Scheidt RA, Ghez C. Separate adaptive mechanisms for controlling trajectory and final position in reaching. J Neurophysiol 98: 3600-3613, 2007.
37. Schenk T. An allocentric rather than perceptual deficit in patient D.F. Nat Neurosci 9: 1369-1370, 2006. (Pubitemid 44646208)
38. Schlicht E, Schrater P. Impact of coordinate transformation uncertainty on human sensorimotor control. J Neurophysiol 97: 4203-4214, 2007. (Pubitemid 47080651)
39. Smeets JBJ, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, de Grave DDJ, van Beers RJ, Brenner E. Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 18781-18786, 2006. (Pubitemid 44913487)
40. Sober SJ, Sabes PN. Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning. Nat Neurosci 8: 490-497, 2005. (Pubitemid 41007567)
41. Thaler L, Goodale MA. Beyond distance and direction: the CNS represents target location in a non-metric format. J Vis 10: 1-27, 2010.
42. Thaler L, Todd JT. The use of head/eye-centered, hand-centered and allocentric representations for visually guided hand movements and perceptual judgments. Neuropsychologia 47: 1227-1244, 2009a.
43. Thaler L, Todd JT. The control parameters used by the CNS to guide the hand depend on the visuo-motor task: evidence from visually guided pointing. Neuroscience 159: 578-598, 2009b.
44. Thaler L, Todd JT. Evidence from visuomotor adaptation for two partially independent visuomotor systems. J Exp Psycol Hum Percept Perform 36: 924-935, 2010.
45. Todorov E. Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nat Neurosci 7: 907-915, 2004. (Pubitemid 39129496)
46. Todorov E, Jordan MI. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5: 1226-1235, 2002. (Pubitemid 35247183)
47. van Beers RJ, Haggard P, Wolpert DM. The role of execution noise in movement variability. J Neurophysiol 91: 1050-1063, 2004. (Pubitemid 38168871)
48. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, van der Gon JJD. The precision of proprioceptive position sense. Exp Brain Res 122: 367-377, 1998. (Pubitemid 28457134)
49. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, van der Gon JJD. Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. J Neurophys 81: 1355-1364, 1999. (Pubitemid 29272452)
50. van Beers RJ, Wolpert DM, Haggard P. When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Curr Biol 12: 834-837, 2002. (Pubitemid 34514369)
51. Veerman MM, Brenner E, Smeets JBJ. The latency for correcting a movement depends on the visual attribute that defines the target. Exp Brain Res 187: 219-228, 2008.
52. Warren DH. Spatial localization under conflict conditions: is there a single explanation? Perception 8: 323-337, 1979. (Pubitemid 9219590)
53. Welch RB, Warren DH. Intersensory interactions. In: Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, edited by Boff KR, Kaufman L, Thomas JP. New York: Wiley, 1986, vol. 1, 25.1-25.36.