Cue reliability and a landmark stability heuristic determine relative weighting between egocentric and allocentric visual information in memory-guided reach

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 103, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 3054-3069

  Byrne, Patrick A ^a,b   Crawford, J Douglas ^a,b  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GAZE; HUMAN; MALE; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MEMORY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH; VIBRATION; VISUAL INFORMATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL PROCESSES; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL FIELDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953517135     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01008.2009     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Allen DM. Relationship between variable selection and data augmentation and a method for prediction. Technometrics 16: 125-127, 1974.
2. Ariff G, Donchin O, Nanayakkara T, Shadmehr R. A real-time state predictor in motor control: study of saccadic eye movements during unseen reaching movements. J Neurosci 22: 7721-7729, 2002. (Pubitemid 35386371)
3. Batista AP, Buneo CA, Snyder LH, Andersen RA. Reach plans in eyecentered coordinates. Science 285: 257-260, 1999.
4. Battaglia PW, Jacobs RA, Aslin RN. Bayesian integration of visual and auditory signals for spatial localization. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 20: 1391-1397, 2003.
5. Beurze SM, Van Pelt S, Medendorp WP. Behavioral reference frames for planning human reaching movements. J Neurophysiol 96: 352-362, 2006.
6. Biegler R, Morris RG. Landmark stability is a prerequisite for spatial but not discrimination learning. Nature 361: 631-633, 1993.
7. Biegler R, Morris RG. Landmark stability: studies exploring whether the perceived stability of the environment influences spatial representation. J Exp Biol 199: 187-193, 1996a. (Pubitemid 126603951)
8. Biegler R, Morris RG. Landmark stability: further studies pointing to a role in spatial learning. Q J Exp Psychol B 49: 307-345, 1996b. (Pubitemid 126683277)
9. Blohm G, Crawford JD. Computations for geometrically accurate visually guided reaching in 3-D space. J Vis 7: Article 4 (1-22), 2007.
10. Bock O. Contribution of retinal versus extraretinal signals towards visual localization in goal-directed movements. Exp Brain Res 64: 476-482, 1986.
11. Brainard DH. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis 10: 433-436, 1997.
12. Bridgeman B, Peery S, Anand S. Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Percept Psychophys 59: 456-469, 1997. (Pubitemid 127456389)
13. Brincat SL, Connor CE. Underlying principles of visual shape selectivity in posterior inferotemporal cortex. Nat Neurosci 7: 880-886, 2004.
14. Brouwer A-M, Knill DC. Humans use visual and remembered information about object location to plan pointing movements. J Vis 9: Article 24 (1-19), 2009.
15. Buneo CA, Jarvis MR, Batista AP, Andersen RA. Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching. Nature 416: 632-636, 2002.
16. Burgess N. Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends Cogn Sci 10: 551-557, 2006.
17. Burgess N, Spiers HJ, Paleologou E. Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory. Cognition 94: 149-166, 2004.
18. Byrne P, Becker S, Burgess N. Remembering the past and imagining the future: a neural model of spatial memory and imagery. Psychol Rev 114: 340-375, 2007.
19. Carey DP, Dijkerman HC, Murphy KJ, Goodale MA, Milner AD. Pointing to places and spaces in a patient with visual form agnosia. Neuropsychologia 44: 1584-1594, 2006.
20. Carlton LG. Processing visual feedback information for movement control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 7: 1019-1030, 1981.
21. Carrozzo M, Stratta F, McIntyre J, Lacquaniti F. Cognitive allocentric representations of visual space shape pointing errors. Exp Brain Res 147: 426-436, 2002.
22. Chafee MV, Averbeck BB, Crowe DA. Representing spatial relationships in posterior parietal cortex: single neurons code object-referenced position. Cereb Cortex 17: 2914-2932, 2007.
23. Chafee MV, Goldman-Rakic PS. Matching patterns of activity in primate prefrontal area 8a and parietal area 7ip neurons during a spatial working memory task. J Neurophysiol 79: 2919-2940, 1998.
24. Committeri G, Galati G, Paradis AL, Pizzamiglio L, Berthoz A, LeBihan D. Reference frames for spatial cognition: different brain areas are involved in viewer-, object-, and landmark-centered judgments about object location. J Cogn Neurosci 16: 1517-1535, 2004.
25. Crawford JD, Medendorp WP, Marotta JJ. Spatial transformations for eye-hand coordination. J Neurophysiol 92: 10-19, 2004.
26. Crowe DA, Averbeck BB, Chafee MV. Neural ensemble decoding reveals a correlate of viewer- to object-centered spatial transformation in monkey parietal cortex. J Neurosci 28: 5218-5228, 2008.
27. Dassonville P, Bala JK. Perception, action, and Roelofs effect: a mere illusion of dissociation. PLoS Biol 2: e364, 2004.
28. Dassonville P, Schlag J, Schlag-Rey M. The frontal eye field provides the goal of saccadic eye movement. Exp Brain Res 89: 300-310, 1992.
29. de Grave DDJ, Brenner E, Smeets JB. Are the original Roelofs effect and the induced Roelofs effect caused by the same shift in straight ahead? Vision Res 42: 2279-2285, 2002.
30. de Grave DDJ, Brenner E, Smeets JB. Illusions as a tool to study the coding of pointing movements. Exp Brain Res 155: 56-62, 2004.
31. Diedrichsen J, Werner S, Schmidt T, Trommershauser J. Immediate spatial distortions of pointing movements induced by visual landmarks. Percept Psychophys 66: 89-103, 2004. (Pubitemid 38545498)
32. Ernst MO, Banks MS. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415: 429-433, 2002.
33. Flanagan JR, King S, Wolpert DM, Johansson RS. Sensorimotor prediction and memory in object manipulation. Can J Exp Psychol 55: 87-95, 2001. (Pubitemid 33598925)
34. Flanagan JR, Terao Y, Johansson RS. Gaze behavior when reaching to remembered targets. J Neurophysiol 100: 1533-1543, 2008.
35. Flanagan JR, Vetter P, Johansson RS, Wolpert DM. Prediction precedes control in motor learning. Curr Biol 13: 146-150, 2003.
36. Galati G, Lobel E, Vallar G, Berthoz A, Pizzamiglio L, Le Bihan D. The neural basis of egocentric and allocentric coding of space in humans: a functional magnetic resonance study. Exp Brain Res 133: 156-164, 2000. (Pubitemid 30449901)
37. Glover S, Dixon P. A step and a hop on the Muller-Lyer: illusion effects on lower-limb movements. Exp Brain Res 154: 504-512, 2004.
38. Goodale MA, Milner AD. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15: 20-25, 1992.
39. Goodale MA, Westwood DA, Milner AD. Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action. Prog Brain Res 144: 131-144, 2004.
40. Hanisch C, Konczak J, Dohle C. The effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping behaviour of children. Exp Brain Res 137: 237-245, 2001.
41. Hay L, Redon C. Response delay and spatial representation in pointing movements. Neurosci Lett 408: 194-198, 2006.
42. Heath M, Maraj A, Godbolt B, Binsted G. Action without awareness: reaching to an object you do not remember seeing. PLoS One 3: e3539, 2008.
43. Henriques DY, Klier EM, Smith MA, Lowy D, Crawford JD. Gaze-centered remapping of remembered visual space in an open-loop pointing task. J Neurosci 18: 1583-1594, 1998. (Pubitemid 28082439)
44. Ilg UJ. The role of areas MT and MST in coding of visual motion underlying the execution of smooth pursuit. Vision Res 48: 2062-2069, 2008.
45. Jeffery KJ. Learning of landmark stability and instability by hippocampal place cells. Neuropharmacology 37: 677-687, 1998.
46. Keele SW, Posner MI. Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. J Exp Psychol 77: 155-158, 1968.
47. Khan AZ, Pisella L, Rossetti Y, Vighetto A, Crawford JD. Impairment of gaze-centered updating of reach targets in bilateral parietal-occipital damaged patients. Cereb Cortex 15: 1547-1560, 2005a.
48. Khan AZ, Pisella L, Vighetto A, Cotton F, Luaute J, Boisson D, Salemme R, Crawford JD, Rossetti Y. Optic ataxia errors depend on remapped, not viewed, target location. Nat Neurosci 8: 418-420, 2005b.
49. Knill DC. Reaching for visual cues to depth: the brain combines depth cues differently for motor control and perception. J Vis 5: Article 2 (103-115), 2005.
50. Knill DC. Learning Bayesian priors for depth perception. J Vis 7: Article 13 (1-20), 2007a.
51. Knill DC. Robust cue integration: a Bayesian model and evidence from cue-conflict studies with stereoscopic and figure cues to slant. J Vis 7: Article 5 (1-24), 2007b.
52. Knill DC, Saunders JA. Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? Vision Res 43: 2539-2558, 2003.
53. Koch G, Oliveri M, Torriero S, Carlesimo GA, Turriziani P, Caltagirone C. rTMS evidence of different delay and decision processes in a fronto-parietal neuronal network activated during spatial working memory. NeuroImage 24: 34-39, 2005.
54. Kording KP, Beierholm U, Ma WJ, Quartz S, Tenenbaum JB, Shams L. Causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS One 2: e943, 2007.
55. Kording KP, Wolpert DM. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 427: 244-247, 2004.
56. Krigolson O, Clark N, Heath M, Binsted G. The proximity of visual landmarks impacts reaching performance. Spat Vis 20: 317-336, 2007.
57. Krigolson O, Heath M. Background visual cues and memory-guided reaching. Hum Mov Sci 23: 861-877, 2004.
58. Lemay M, Bertram CP, Stelmach GE. Pointing to an allocentric and egocentric remembered target. Motor Control 8: 16-32, 2004.
59. McGuire LM, Sabes PN. Sensory transformations and the use of multiple reference frames for reach planning. Nat Neurosci 12: 1056-1061, 2009.
60. Medendorp WP, Crawford JD. Visuospatial updating of reaching targets in near and far space. Neuroreport 13: 633-636, 2002.
61. Medendorp WP, Goltz HC, Vilis T, Crawford JD. Gaze-centered updating of visual space in human parietal cortex. J Neurosci 23: 6209-6214, 2003a. (Pubitemid 36875621)
62. Medendorp WP, Tweed DB, Crawford JD. Motion parallax is computed in the updating of human spatial memory. J Neurosci 23: 8135-8142, 2003b.
63. Merriam EP, Genovese CR, Colby CL. Spatial updating in human parietal cortex. Neuron 39: 361-373, 2003.
64. Merriam EP, Genovese CR, Colby CL. Remapping in human visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 97: 1738-1755, 2007.
65. Neely KA, Tessmer A, Binsted G, Heath M. Goal-directed reaching: movement strategies influence the weighting of allocentric and egocentric visual cues. Exp Brain Res 186: 375-384, 2008.
66. Neggers SF, Scholvinck ML, van der Lubbe RH, Postma A. Quantifying the interactions between allo- and egocentric representations of space. Acta Psychol (Amst) 118: 25-45, 2005.
67. Niemeier M, Crawford JD, Tweed DB. Optimal transsaccadic integration explains distorted spatial perception. Nature 422: 76-80, 2003.
68. Obhi SS, Goodale MA. The effects of landmarks on the performance of delayed and real-time pointing movements. Exp Brain Res 167: 335-344, 2005.
69. Olson CR, Gettner SN. Object-centered direction selectivity in the macaque supplementary eye field. Science 269: 985-988, 1995.
70. Olson CR, Tremblay L. Macaque supplementary eye field neurons encode object-centered locations relative to both continuous and discontinuous objects. J Neurophysiol 83: 2392-2411, 2000. (Pubitemid 30198686)
71. Pasupathy A, Connor CE. Population coding of shape in area V4. Nat Neurosci 5: 1332-1338, 2002.
72. Paulignan Y, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R, Jeannerod M. Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 1. The effects of changing object position. Exp Brain Res 83: 502-512, 1991.
73. Pelli DG. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10: 437-442, 1997.
74. Prime SL, Niemeier M, Crawford JD. Transsaccadic integration of visual features in a line intersection task. Exp Brain Res 169: 532-548, 2006.
75. Prime SL, Tsotsos L, Keith GP, Crawford JD. Visual memory capacity in transsaccadic integration. Exp Brain Res 180: 609-628, 2007.
76. Prime SL, Vesia M, Crawford JD. Transcranial magnetic stimulation over posterior parietal cortex disrupts transsaccadic memory of multiple objects. J Neurosci 28: 6938-6949, 2008.
77. Robinson DA. The use of control systems analysis in the neurophysiology of eye movements. Annu Rev Neurosci 4: 463-503, 1981.
78. Sabes PN, Breznen B, Andersen RA. Parietal representation of object-based saccades. J Neurophysiol 88: 1815-1829, 2002.
79. Schenk T. An allocentric rather than perceptual deficit in patient D.F. Nat Neurosci 9: 1369-1370, 2006.
80. Schlag J, Schlag-Rey M. Does microstimulation evoke fixed-vector saccades by generating their vector or by specifying their goal? Exp Brain Res 68: 442-444, 1987. (Pubitemid 18067581)
81. Sereno AB, Maunsell JH. Shape selectivity in primate lateral intraparietal cortex. Nature 395: 500-503, 1998.
82. Sheth BR, Shimojo S. Extrinsic cues suppress the encoding of intrinsic cues. J Cogn Neurosci 16: 339-350, 2004.
83. Smeets JB, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, de Grave DDJ, van Beers RJ, Brenner E. Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 18781-18786, 2006.
84. Snyder LH, Grieve KL, Brotchie P, Andersen RA. Separate body- and world-referenced representations of visual space in parietal cortex. Nature 394: 887-891, 1998.
85. Taylor JR. An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements. Sausalito, CA: University Science Books, 1997.
86. Thaler L, Todd JT. The use of head/eye-centered, hand-centered and allocentric representations for visually guided hand movements and perceptual judgments. Neuropsychologia 47: 1227-1244, 2009.
87. Thier P, Andersen RA. Electrical microstimulation suggests two different forms of representation of head-centered space in the intraparietal sulcus of rhesus monkeys. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 4962-4967, 1996.
88. Thier P, Andersen RA. Electrical microstimulation distinguishes distinct saccade-related areas in the posterior parietal cortex. J Neurophysiol 80: 1713-1735, 1998. (Pubitemid 28489106)
89. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Gon JJ. Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: an experimentally supported model. J Neurophysiol 81: 1355-1364, 1999.
90. van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh G, Smeets J. Multiple information sources in interceptive timing. Hum Mov Sci 16: 787-821, 1997.
91. Vann SD, Aggleton JP, Maguire EA. What does the retrosplenial cortex do? Nat Rev Neurosci 10: 792-802, 2009.
92. Vaziri S, Diedrichsen J, Shadmehr R. Why does the brain predict sensory consequences of oculomotor commands? Optimal integration of the predicted and the actual sensory feedback. J Neurosci 26: 4188-4197, 2006.
93. Verhagen L, Dijkerman HC, Grol MJ, Toni I. Perceptuo-motor interactions during prehension movements. J Neurosci 28: 4726-4735, 2008.
94. Zaehle T, Jordan K, Wustenberg T, Baudewig J, Dechent P, Mast FW. The neural basis of the egocentric and allocentric spatial frame of reference. Brain Res 1137: 92-103, 2007.
95. Zelaznik HZ, Hawkins B, Kisselburgh L. Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements. J Mot Behav 15: 217-236, 1983.