Implementation of asymmetric yielding in case-specific finite element models improves the prediction of femoral fractures

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 183-193

  Derikx, Loes C ^a   Vis, Roeland ^a   Meinders, Timo ^b   Verdonschot, Nico ^a,b   Tanck, Esther ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bone strength; Finite element modelling; Metastatic bone disease; Prediction; Yield asymmetry

Indexed keywords

BONE STRENGTH; FINITE ELEMENT MODELLING; METASTATIC BONE DISEASE; PREDICTION; YIELD ASYMMETRY;

BONE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FORECASTING; FRACTURE; QUALITY ASSURANCE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

YIELD STRESS;

AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FEMORAL FRACTURES; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 79951740379     PISSN: 10255842     EISSN: 14768259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2010.542463     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bayraktar HH, Gupta A, Kwon RY, Papadopoulos P, Keaveny TM. 2004. The modified super-ellipsoid yield criterion for human trabecular bone. J Biomech Eng. 126(6): 677-684.
2. Bayraktar HH, Morgan EF, Niebur GL, Morris GE, Wong EK, Keaveny TM. 2004. Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. J Biomech. 37(1):27-35.
3. Bessho M, Ohnishi I, Matsumoto T, Ohashi S, Matsuyama J, Tobita K, Kaneko M, Nakamura K. 2009. Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions. Bone. 45(2):226-231.
4. Bessho M, Ohnishi I, Matsuyama J, Matsumoto T, Imai K, Nakamura K. 2007. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method. J Biomech. 40(8):1745-1753.
5. Body JJ. 2003. Rationale for the use of bisphosphonates in osteoblastic and osteolytic bone lesions. Breast. 12(Suppl 2): S37-S44.
6. Harvey HA. 1997. Issues concerning the role of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy of bone metastases from breast carcinoma. Cancer. 80(Suppl 8):1646-1651.
7. Hipp JA, Springfield DS, Hayes WC. 1995. Predicting pathologic fracture risk in the management of metastatic bone defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 312:120-135.
8. Hoskin PJ. 2003. Bisphosphonates and radiation therapy for palliation of metastatic bone disease. Cancer Treat Rev. 29(4):321-327.
9. Kaneko TS, Pejcic MR, Tehranzadeh J, Keyak JH. 2003. Relationships between material properties and CT scan data of cortical bone with and without metastatic lesions. Med Eng Phys. 25(6):445-454.
10. Keaveny TM, Wachtel EF, Ford CM, Hayes WC. 1994. Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus. J Biomech. 27(9):1137-1146.
11. Keyak JH. 2001. Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models. Med Eng Phys. 23(3):165-173.
12. Keyak JH, Kaneko TS, Rossi SA, Pejcic MR, Tehranzadeh J, Skinner HB. 2005. Predicting the strength of femoral shafts with and without metastatic lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 439:161-170.
13. Keyak JH, Kaneko TS, Skinner HB, Hoang BH. 2007. The effect of simulated metastatic lytic lesions on proximal femoral strength. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 459:139-145.
14. Keyak JH, Kaneko TS, Tehranzadeh J, Skinner HB. 2005. Predicting proximal femoral strength using structural engineering models. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 437:219-228.
15. Keyak JH, Rossi SA. 2000. Prediction of femoral fracture load using finite element models: an examination of stress- and strain-based failure theories. J Biomech. 33(2):209-214.
16. Kopperdahl DL, Keaveny TM. 1998. Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone. J Biomech. 31(7):601-608.
17. Kyle RF, Cabanela ME, Russell TA, Swiontkowski MF, Winquist RA, Zuckerman JD, Schmidt AH, Koval KJ. 1995. Fractures of the proximal part of the femur. Instr Course Lect. 44:227-253.
18. Lenaerts L, van Lenthe GH. 2009. Multi-level patient-specific modelling of the proximal femur. A promising tool to quantify the effect of osteoporosis treatment. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci. 367(1895):2079-2093.
19. Mirels H. 1989. Metastatic disease in long bones. A proposed scoring system for diagnosing impending pathologic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 249:256-264.
20. Morgan EF, Keaveny TM. 2001. Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site. J Biomech. 34(5): 569-577.
21. Mullins LP, Bruzzi MS, McHugh PE. 2009. Calibration of a constitutive model for the post-yield behaviour of cortical bone. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2(5):460-470.
22. Niebur GL, Feldstein MJ, Yuen JC, Chen TJ, Keaveny TM. 2000. High-resolution finite element models with tissue strength asymmetry accurately predict failure of trabecular bone. J Biomech. 33(12):1575-1583.
23. Orwoll ES, Marshall LM, Nielson CM, Cummings SR, Lapidus J, Cauley JA, Ensrud K, Lane N, Hoffmann PR, Kopperdahl DL, Keaveny TM. 2009. Finite element analysis of the proximal femur and hip fracture risk in older men. J Bone Miner Res. 24(3):475-483.
24. Tanck E, van Aken JB, Van der Linden YM, Schreuder HW, Binkowski M, Huizenga H, Verdonschot N. 2009. Pathological fracture prediction in patients with metastatic lesions can be improved with quantitative computed tomography based computer models. Bone. 45(4):777-783.
25. Van der Linden YM, Dijkstra PD, Kroon HM, Lok JJ, Noordijk EM, Leer JW, Marijnen CA. 2004. Comparative analysis of risk factors for pathological fracture with femoral metastases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 86(4):566-573.
26. Van der Linden YM, Kroon HM, Dijkstra SP, Lok JJ, Noordijk EM, Leer JW, Marijnen CA. 2003. Simple radiographic parameter predicts fracturing in metastatic femoral bone lesions: results from a randomised trial. Radiother Oncol. 69(1):21-31.