Predicting proximal femoral strength using structural engineering models

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 437, Issue , 2005, Pages 219-228

  Keyak, Joyce H ^a,b,c   Kaneko, Tadashi S ^a   Tehranzadeh, Jamshid ^a,d   Skinner, Harry B ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of California at Irvine   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BONE STRENGTH; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; MODEL; OSTEOPOROSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; WEIGHT BEARING;

EID: 23244463551     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000164400.37905.22     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alffram PA: An epidemiologic study of cervical and trochanteric fractures of the femur in an urban population: Analysis of 1,664 cases with special reference to etiologic factors. Acta Orthop Scand 65(26 Suppl):1-109, 1964.
2. Beals RK, Lawton GD, Snell WE: Prophylactic internal fixation of the femur in metastatic breast cancer. Cancer 28:1350-1354, 1971.
3. Beck TJ, Mourtada FA, Ruff CB, Scott Jr WW, Kao G: Experimental testing of a DEXA-derived curved beam model of the proximal femur. J Orthop Res 16:394-398, 1998.
4. Beck TJ, Ruff CB, Warden KE, Scott WJ, Rao GU: Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data: A structural approach. Invest Radiol 25:6-18, 1990.
5. Bergmann G: HIP98. Berlin, Feie Universität 2001.
6. Cheal EJ, Hipp JA, Hayes WC: Evaluation of finite element analysis for prediction of the strength reduction due to metastatic lesions in the femoral neck. J Biomech 26:251-264, 1993.
7. Cheng DS, Seitz CB, Eyre HJ: Nonoperative management of femoral, humeral, and acetabular metastases in patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer 45:1533-1537, 1980.
8. Ciarelli MJ, Goldstein SA, Kuhn JL, Cody DD, Brown MB: Evaluation of orthogonal mechanical properties and density of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions with materials testing and computed tomography. J Orthop Res 9:674-682, 1991.
9. Cody DD, Gross GJ, Hou FJ, et al: Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. J Biomech 32:1013-1020, 1999.
10. Glantz SA, Slinker BK: Primer of Applied Regression and Analysis of Variance. New York, McGraw-Hill 1990.
11. Habermann ET, Sachs R, Stern RE, Hirsh DM, Anderson WJ: The pathology and treatment of metastatic disease of the femur. Clin Orthop 169:70-82, 1982.
12. Heller M, Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, et al: Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. J Biomech 34:883-893, 2001.
13. Hipp JA, Springfield DS, Hayes WC: Predicting pathologic fracture risk in the management of metastatic bone defects. Clin Orthop 312:120-135, 1995.
14. Holbrook TL, Grazier KL: The Frequency of Occurrence, Impact and Cost of Selected Musculoskeletal Conditions in the United States. Chicago, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 1984.
15. Kaneko TS, Bell JS, Pejcic MR, Tehranzadeh J, Keyak JH: Mechanical properties, density and quantitative CT scan data of trabecular bone with and without metastases. J Biomech 37:523-530, 2004.
16. Kaneko TS, Pejcic MR, Tehranzadeh J, Keyak JH: Relationships between material properties and CT scan data of cortical bone with and without metastatic lesions. Med Eng Phys 25:445-454, 2003.
17. Kanis JA: Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 359:1929-1936, 2002.
18. Keene JS, Sellinger DS, McBeath AA, Engber WD: Metastatic breast cancer in the femur: A search for the lesion at risk of fracture. Clin Orthop 203:282-288, 1986.
19. Keyak JH: Relationships between femoral fracture loads for two load configurations. J Biomech 33:499-502, 2000.
20. Keyak JH: Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models. Med Eng Phys 23:165-173, 2001.
21. Keyak JH, Falkinstein Y: Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load. Med Eng Phys 25:781-787, 2003.
22. Keyak JH, Lee IY, Nath DS, Skinner HB: Postfailure compressive behavior of tibial trabecular bone in three anatomic directions. J Biomed Mater Res 31:373-378, 1996.
23. Keyak JH, Rossi SA, Jones KA, Les CM, Skinner HB: Prediction of fracture location in the proximal femur using finite element models. Med Eng Phys 23:657-664, 2001.
24. Keyak JH, Rossi SA, Jones KA, Skinner HB: Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. J Biomech 31:125-133, 1998.
25. Keyak JH, Skinner HB, Fleming JA: Effect of force direction on femoral fracture load for two types of loading conditions. J Orthop Res 29:539-544, 2001.
26. Kozak LJ, Hall MJ, Owings MF: National hospital discharge survey: 2000 annual summary with detailed diagnosis and procedure data. Vital Health Stat 13:1-203, 2002.
27. Lang P, Steiger P, Faulkner K, Gleuer C, Genant HK: Osteoporosis: Current techniques and recent developments in quantitative bone densitometry. Radiol Clin North Am 29:49-76, 1991.
28. Les CM, Keyak JH, Stover SM, Taylor KT, Kaneps AJ: Estimation of material properties in the equine metacarpus with use of quantitative computed tomography. J Orthop Res 12:822-833, 1994.
29. Lin JT, Lane JM: Osteoporosis: A review. Clin Orthop 1:126-134, 2004.
30. Lotz JC, Hayes WC: The use of quantitative computed tomography to estimate risk of fracture of the hip from falls. J Bone Joint Surg 72A:689-700, 1990.
31. Marks R, Allegrante J, MacKenzie C, Lane J: Hip fractures among the elderly: Causes, consequences and control. Aging Res Rev 2:57-93, 2003.
32. Michaeli DA, Inoue K, Hayes WC, Hipp JA: Density predicts the activity-dependent failure load of proximal femora with defects. Skeletal Radiol 28:90-95, 1999.
33. Miller CW: Survival and ambulation following hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg 60A:930-934, 1978.
34. Mirels H: Metastatic disease in long bones: A proposed scoring system for diagnosing impending pathologic fractures. Clin Orthop 249:256-264, 1989.
35. Mourtada FA, Beck TJ, Hauser DL, Ruff CB, Bao G: Curved beam model of the proximal femur for estimating stress using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry derived structural geometry. J Orthop Res 14:483-492, 1996.
36. Reilly DT, Burstein AH: The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech 8:393-405, 1975.
37. Richmond J, Aharonoff GB, Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ: Mortality risk after hip fracture. J Orthop Trauma 17:53-56, 2003.
38. Shigley JE: Mechanical Engineering Design. Ed 3. New York, McGraw-Hill 1977.
39. Snell WE, Beals RK: Femoral metastases and fractures from breast cancer. Surg Gynecol Obstet 119:22-24, 1964.
40. Testi D, Viceconti M, Baruffaldi F, Cappello A: Risk of fracture in elderly patients: A new predictive index based on bone mineral density and finite element analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 60:23-33, 1999.
41. Testi D, Viceconti M, Cappello A, Gnudi S: Prediction of hip fracture can be significantly improved by a single biomedical indicator. Ann Biomed Eng 30:801-807, 2002.
42. Van der Linden Y, Dijkstra P, Kroon H, et al: Comparative analysis of risk factors for pathological fracture with femoral metastases. J Bone Joint Surg 86B:566-573, 2004.