An assessment of mathematics teachers' internet self-efficacy: Implications on teachers' delivery of mathematics instruction

International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 155-174

  Tella, Adedeji ^a  

^a OSUN STATE UNIVERSITY   (Nigeria)

Author keywords

Instructional delivery; Internet; Internet self efficacy; Mathematics teacher; Nigeria

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951738185     PISSN: 0020739X     EISSN: 14645211     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0020739X.2010.519798     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. S. Al-Jaghoub and C. Westrup, Jordan and ICT-led development: Towards a competition state? Inf. Technol. People 16(1) (2003), pp. 93-110.
2. Moeini, Identifying needs: A missing part in teacher training programs, Int. J. Media Technol. Lifelong Learning 4(1) (2008). Available at http://seminar.net/index.php/volume-4-issue-1-2008-previousissuesmeny-122/93-identifying-needs-a-missing-part-inteacher-training-programs
3. C. Duke, Teachers and New ICT in Teaching and Learning. Sectoral Activities Programme, International Labour Office, Geneva, 2002. Available at http://www.ilo.org/public/english/dialogue/sector/papers/education/wp190.pdf
4. C. Duke, Teachers and New ICT in Teaching and Learning. Sectoral Activities Programme, International Labour Office, Geneva, 2002. Available at http://www.ilo.org/public/english/dialogue/sector/papers/education/wp190.pdf
5. S.E. Smaldino, D.L. Lowther, and J.D. Russell, Instructional Technology and Media for Learning, Pearson Merrill/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2008.
6. M. Lebec and J. Luft, A mixed methods analysis of learning in online teacher professional development: A case report, Contemp. Issues Technol. Teach. Educ. 7(1) (2007), pp. 554-574.
7. Baer, Will the Internet Transform Higher Education? The Aspen Institute, Washington DC, 1998 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED434551).
8. Eamon, Distance education: Has technology become a threat to the academy? Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 31(2) (1999), pp. 197-207.
9. F.M. Hess, A.J. Rotherham, and K.B. Walsh, A Qualified Teacher in Every Classroom? Appraising Old Answers and New Ideas, Harvard, Cambridge, MA, 2004.
10. Wolfolk-Hoy, Self-efficacy in college teaching, Essays Teach. Excellence 15(7) (2004). Available at http://www.coe.ohio-state.edu/ahoy/
11. P.T. Ashton and R.B. Webb, Teachers' sense of efficacy, classroom behavior, and student achievement, in Teachers' Sense of Efficacy and Student Achievement, P.T. Ashton and R.B. Webb, eds., Longman, New York and London, 1986, pp. 125-144.
12. T. Coladarchi, Teachers' sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching, J. Exp. Educ. 60 (1992), pp. 323-337.
13. S. Gibson and M.H. Dembo, Teacher efficacy: A construct validation, J. Educ. Psychology 76 (1984), pp. 569-582.
14. M. Tschannen-Moran and A. Woolfolk Hoy, Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct, Teaching Teach. Educ. 17 (2001), pp. 783-805.
15. J.A. Ross, The impact of an inservice to promote cooperative learning on the stability of teacher efficacy, Teaching Teach. Educ. 10 (1994), pp. 381-394.
16. J.R. Hill and M.J. Hannafin, Cognitive strategies and learning from the World Wide Web, Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 47 (1997), pp. 37-64.
17. Y. Joo, M. Bong, and H. Choi, Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning: Academic selfefficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction, Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 48(2) (2000), pp. 5-17.
18. M.-J. Tsai and C.-C. Tsai, Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of Internet self-efficacy, Innovations Educ. Teaching Int. 40 (2003), pp. 43-50.
19. M.Y. Yi and Y. Hwang, Predicting the use of web-based information systems: Self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 59(4) (2003), pp. 431-449.
20. J.-C. Liang and C.-C. Tsai, Internet self-efficacy and preferences toward constructivist Internet-based learning environments: A study of pre-school teachers in Taiwan, Educ. Technol. Soc. 11(1) (2008), pp. 226-237.
21. P. Eachus, S. Cassidy, S. Norgate, L. Marrow, and L. Greene, Internet self-efficacy and visual search strategies: The use of eye tracking technology in the development of web-based learning resources, Proceedings of the Informing Science and IT Education Conference SITE, October, Australia, 2008.
22. Adeyemo, Parental involvement, interest in schooling, and school environment as predictors of academic self-efficacy among fresh secondary school student in Oyo State Nigeria, Electron. J. Res. Educ. Psychology 5-3(1) (2005), pp. 163-180.
23. A. Tella and C.O. Ayeni, The impact of self-efficacy and prior computer experience on the creativity of new librarians in selected Universities Libraries in Southwest Nigeria, Libr. Philos. Pract. 8(2) (2006), pp. 1-10.
24. A. Tella, A. Tella, C.O. Ayeni, and R.O. Omoba, Predictors of academic performance: Self-efficacy and use of electronic information, Univ. Dar Es Salaam Libr. J. 9(1) (2007), pp. 69-83.
25. A. Tella, A. Tella, and P.A. Adekunle, An assessment of the Librarian social competence and ICT'S self-efficacy: Implications on the Library practices in the digital era, Pacific Northwest Libr. Assoc. PNLA Q. 71(4) (2007), pp. 12-16.
26. A. Tella, A. Tella, C.O. Ayeni, and R.O. Omooba, Self-efficacy and use of electronic information as predictors of academic performance, Electron. J. Acad. Special Librarianship 8(2) (2007).
27. A. Bandura, Self efficacy: The Exercise of Control, W.H. Freeman & Co., New York, NY, 1997.
28. A. Bandura, Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, in The Self in Social Psychology, R.F. Baumeister, ed., Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA, 1999, pp. 285-298.
29. M. DeTure, Cognitive style and self-efficacy: Predicting student success in online distance education, Am. J. Distance Educ. 18(1) (2004), pp. 21-38.
30. D.R. Compeau and C.A. Higgins, Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test, Managing Inf. Syst. Q. 19(2) (1995), pp. 189-211.
31. J.E. Maddux and J.T. Gesselin, Self-efficacy, in Handbook of Self and Identity, M.R. Leary and J.P. Tangney, eds., Guilford Press, New York, 2003, pp. 218-238.
32. R. Klassen, Writing in early adolescence: A review of the role of self-efficacy, Educ. Psychology Rev. 14(2) (2002), pp. 173-203.
33. W. Tabassam and J. Grainger, Self-concept, attributional style and self-efficacy beliefs of students with learning disabilities with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Learn Disabil. Q. 25(2) (2002), pp. 141-151.
34. R. Klassen, A question of calibration: A review of the self-efficacy beliefs of students with learning disabilities, Learn. Disabil. Q. 25(2) (2002), pp. 88-102.
35. S.A. Rathus and J.S. Nevid, Adjustment and Growth, 3rd ed., Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1986.
36. Lee, Goal orientation, goal setting, and academic performance in college students: An integrated model of achievement motivation in school settings, Diss. Abstr Int: Humanit. Soc. Sci. 59(6-A) (1998), p. 1905.
37. A. Bandura, Self-efficacy, in Concise Encyclopedia of Psychology, R.J. Corsini and A.J. Auerbach, eds., Wiley, New York, 1996, pp. 812-813.
38. M. Csikszentmihalyi and K. Rathunde, The development of the person: An experiential perspective on the ontogenesis of psychological complexity, in Handbook of Child Psychology, W. Damon and R.M. Lernert, eds., 5th ed., Vol. 1, Wiley, New York, 1998, pp. 635-684.
39. A.F. Grasha and D.S. Kirschenbaum, Adjustment and Competence, West Publishing, St Paul, MN, 1986.
40. M. Pressley and C. McCormick, Cognition, Teaching and Assessment, Harper Collins College Publishers, New York, 1995.
41. P.P. McCabe, Enhancing self-efficacy for high-stakes reading tests, Read. Teach. 57(1) (2003), pp. 12-19.
42. D.H. Schunk and F. Pajares, The development of academic self-efficacy, in Development of Achievement Motivation, A. Wingfield and J.S. Eccles, eds., Academic Press, San Diego, 2002, pp. 15-31.
43. M.S. Eastin and R. LaRose, Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 6(1) (2000). Available at http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/eastin.html
44. F. Pajares, Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings, Rev. Educ. Res 66(4) (1996), pp. 725-734.
45. A. Bandura, Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy, Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 9 (2000), pp. 75-78.
46. A. Bandura, Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective, Annu. Rev. Psychology 52 (2001), pp. 1-26.
47. R. Schwarzer and G.S. Schmitz, Perceived self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A longitudinal study in ten schools, Research Paper, Freie University Berlin, Germany, 2005.
48. W. Ren, Self-efficacy and the search for government information, Ref. User Serv. Q. 38 (1999), pp. 283-291.
49. T.A. Oliver and F. Shapiro, Self-efficacy and computers, J. Comput. Based Interact. 20 (1993), pp. 81-85.
50. M. Wolfinbarger, M.C. Gilly, and H.J. Schau, Keeping up with the times: Innovation and usage of the Internet among later adopters, CRITO Consortium Project, 2005. Available at www.crito.uci.edu/consortium
51. S. Cassidy and P. Eachus, Developing the computer user self-efficacy (CUSE) scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers, J. Educ. Comput. Res. 26(2) (2002), pp. 169-189.
52. D. Nahl, Affective monitoring of Internet learners: Perceived self-efficacy and success, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 33 (1996), pp. 200-209.
53. P. Eachus and S. Cassidy, Development of the Web Users Self-Efficacy Scale (WUSE), Issues in Informing Sci. Inf. Technol. 3 (2006), pp. 199-209. Available at http://informingscience.org/proceedings/InSITE2006/IISITEach219.pdf
54. Waldman, Freshmen's use of library electronic resources and self-efficacy, Inf. Res. 8(2) (2003), paper no. 150. Available at http://informationr.net/ir/8-2/paper150.html
55. N. Ford and D. Miller, Gender differences in internet perception and use, in Electronic Library and Visual Information Research. ELVIRA 3: Papers from the Third ELVIRA Conference, M. Collier and K. Arnold, eds., ASLIB, London, 30 April-2 May 1996, pp. 87-202.
56. N. Ford, D. Miller, and N. Moss, The role of individual differences in Internet searching: an empirical study, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 52(12) (2001), pp. 1049-1066.
57. S. Majid and A.F. Abazova, Computer literacy and use of electronic information sources by academics: A case study of International Islamic University Malaysia, Asian Libr. 8(4) (1999), pp. 100-111.
58. A. Enochsson, A gender perspective on Internet use: Consequences for information seeking, Inf. Res. 10(4) (2005), p. 5.
59. D.J. Haisken, R. Pischner, and G. Wagner, Use of computers and Internet depends heavily on income and level of education, Econ. Bull. 37(11) (2001), pp. 369-374.
60. K. Hakkarainen, L. Ilomäki, L. Lipponen, H. Muukkonen, M. Rahikainen, T. Touminen, M. Lakkala, and E. Latinen, Students' skills and practices using ICT: Results of a national assessment in Finland, Comput. Educ. 34 (2000), pp. 103-117.
61. E. Millard, New technology, old inequalities; Variations found in the use of computers by pupils at home with implications for the school curriculum, 1997. Available at http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/000000362.htm
62. R. Nachmias, D. Mioduser, and A. Shemla, Information and communicationtechnologies usage by students in an Israeli high school: Equity, gender, and inside/outside school learning issues, Educ. Inf. Technol. 6(1) (2001), pp. 43-53.
63. C. Tsai, S.S.J. Lin, and M. Tsai, Developing an Internet attitude scale for high school students, Comput. Educ. 37(1) (2001), pp. 41-51.
64. M. Papastrergiou and C. Solomonidou, Gender issues in Internet access and favourite activities among Greek high school pupils inside and outside school, Comput. Educ. 44(4) (2005), pp. 377-393.
65. T. Brickson and C. Panis, Computers and connectivity: Current trends, in Culture of the Internet, S. Kiesler, ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1997, pp. 407-430.
66. Fountain, Constructing the information society: Women, information technology, and design, Technol. Soc. 22 (2000), pp. 45-62.
67. L. Miller, H. Schweingruber, and C.L. Brandenburg, Middle school students' technology practices and preferences: Re-examining gender differences, J. Educ. Multimedia Hypermedia 10(2) (2001), pp. 125-140.
68. P. Schumacher and J. Morahan-Martin, Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences, Comput. Hum. Behav. 17 (2001), pp. 95-110.
69. D. Mathews and L. Schrum, High speed Internet use and academic gratification in the college residence, Internet Higher Educ. 6(2) (2003), pp. 125-144.
70. A. Duggan, B. Hess, D. Morgan, S. Kim, and K. Wilson, Measuring students' attitude toward educational use of the Internet, J. Educ. Comput. Res. 25(3) (2001), pp. 267-281.
71. E. Manias, Rethinking ethnography: Reconstructing nursing relationships, J. Adv. Nursing 33(2) (1990), pp. 234-242.
72. E. Babbie and J. Mouton, The Practice of Social Research, Oxford University Press, Cape Town, South Africa, 2001.
73. D.F. Polit and B.P. Hungler, Nursing Research: Principle and Methods, 6th ed., Lippincott, New York, 1999.
74. R. Weber, The rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: A personal view1, MIS Q. 28(1) (2004), pp. 1-7.
75. M. Alvesson and K. Sköldberg, Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research, Sage, London, 2000.
76. A.S. Lee, A scientific methodology for MIS case studies, MIS Q. 13(1) (1989), pp. 33-52.
77. Husserl, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology (translated by D. Carr), Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL, 1970.
78. L. Dubé and G. Paré, Rigor in information systems positivist case research, MIS Q. 27(4) (2003), pp. 597-635.
79. H.K. Klein and M.D. Meyers, A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems, MIS Q. 23(1) (1999), pp. 67-93.
80. J. Collis and R. Hussey, Business Research: A Practical Guide for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students, 2nd ed., Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2003.
81. C. Tsai and C. Lin, Taiwanese adolescents' perceptions and attitudes regarding the Internet: Exploring gender differences, Adolescence 39(156) (2004), pp. 725-734.
82. Y.-T. Wu and C.-C. Tsai, University students' Internet attitudes and Internet selfefficacy: A study at three universities in Taiwan, CyberPsychology Behav. 9 (2006), pp. 441-450.
83. H. Peng, C.-C. Tsai, and Y.-T. Wu, University students' self-efficacy and their attitudes toward the Internet: The role of students' perceptions of the Internet, Educ. Stud. 32 (2006), pp. 73-86.