The validity of dynamic and changeable risk factors for the prediction of sexual recidivism in a sample of pedosexual offenders: A study of Stable-2000 and Stable-2007;Die Validität dynamisch-veränderbarer Risikofaktoren bei der Vorhersage einschlägiger Rückfälle pädosexueller Straftäter: Eine Studie über Stable-2000 und Stable-2007

Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 45-53

  Rettenberger, Martin ^a   Matthes, Anna ^b   Schilling, Frank ^a   Eher, Reinhard ^a,c  

^a Reformen und Justiz   (Austria)

^b Jugendanstalt Hameln   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Risk assessment; Sexual offender; Stable 2000; Stable 2007; Static 99; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951679051     PISSN: 18627072     EISSN: 18627080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11757-010-0086-z     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Andrews DA, Bonta J (2006) The psychology of criminal conduct. Anderson, Cincinnati.
2. Archer RP, Buffington-Vollum JK, Stredny RV, Handel RW (2006) A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists. J Pers Assess 87: 84-94.
3. Barbaree HE, Langton CM, Peacock EJ (2006) Different actuarial risk measures produce different risk rankings for sexual offenders. Sex Abuse 18: 423-440.
4. Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112: 155-159.
5. Craig LA, Browne KD, Beech AR (2008) Assessing risk in sex offenders - A practitioner's guide. Wiley, Chichester.
6. Dahle K-P (2005) Psychologische Kriminalprognose. Centaurus, Herbolzheim.
7. Dahle K-P (2007) Methodische Grundlagen der Kriminalprognose. Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol 1: 101-110.
8. Dahle K-P, Schneider V, Ziethen F (2007) Standardisierte Instrumente zur Kriminalprognose. Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol 1: 15-26.
9. Eher R, Rettenberger M, Schilling F, Pfäfflin F (2008) Validität oder praktischer Nutzen? Rückfallvorhersagen mittels Static-99 und SORAG. Eine prospektive Rückfallstudie an 275 Sexualstraftätern. Recht Psychiatr 26: 79-88.
10. Eher R (2009) Zu den Aufgaben der Begutachtungs- und Evaluationsstelle für Gewalt- und Sexualstraftäter im Österreichischen Strafvollzug ' Grundsätzliches, Ergebnisse und Ausblick. Kriminalpaedagog Prax 37: 9-14.
11. Eher R, Rettenberger M, Matthes A (2009) Aktuarische Prognose bei Sexualstraftätern: Ergebnisse einer prospektiven Studie an 785 Tätern unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von relevanten Tätergruppen und Rückfallkategorie. Monatsschr Kriminol 92: 18-27.
12. Endrass J, Urbaniok F, Held L, Vetter S, Rossegger A (2009) Accuracy of the Static-99 in predicting recidivism in Switzerland. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 53: 482-490.
13. Fiedler P (2004) Sexuelle Orientierung und sexuelle Abweichung. Beltz, Weinheim.
14. Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley, New York.
15. Fleiss JL, Williams JBW, Dubro AF (1986) The logistic regression analysis of psychiatric data. J Psychiatr Res 20: 195-209.
16. Grubin D (1998) Sex offending against children: understanding the risk. Police Research Series, Paper 99. Home Office, London.
17. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143: 29-36.
18. Hanson RK (1997) The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism. (User Report No. 1997-04). Department of the Solicitor General of Canada, Ottawa.
19. Hanson RK, Thornton D (2000) Improving risk assessment for sex offenders: a comparison of three actuarial scales. Law Hum Behav 24: 119-136.
20. Hanson RK, Harris AJR (2001) A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sex Abuse 13: 105-122.
21. Hanson RK, Harris AJR, Scott TL, Helmus LMD (2007) Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: the dynamic supervision project. (User Report No. 2007-05). Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, Canada.
22. Hanson RK (2008) What statistics should we use to report predictive accuracy? Crime Scene 14: 15-17.
23. Hanson RK, Bourgon G, Helmus L, Hodgson S (2009) The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: a meta-analysis. Crim Justice Behav 36: 865-891.
24. Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon K (2009) The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychol Assess 21: 1-21.
25. Harkins L, Beech AR (2007) A review of the factors that can influence the effectiveness of sexual offender treatment: risk, need, responsivity, and process issues. Aggress Violent Behav 12: 615-627.
26. Harris A, Phenix A, Hanson RK, Thornton D (2003) Static-99 coding rules revised ' 2003. Department of the Solicitor General of Canada, Ottawa.
27. Helmus L (2009) Re-norming Static-99 recidivism estimates: exploring base rate variability across sex offender samples. Unveröffentlichte Masterarbeit, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
28. Helmus L, Hanson RK, Thornton D (2009) Reporting Static-99 in light of new research on recidivism norms. Forum 21: 38-45.
29. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York.
30. Hunsley J (2003) Introduction to the special section on incremental validity and utility in clinical assessment. Psychol Assess 15: 443-445.
31. Hunsley J, Meyer GJ (2003) The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. Psychol Assess 15: 446-455.
32. Lussier P, Deslauriers-Varin N, Râtel T (2010) A descriptive profile of high-risk sex offenders under intensive supervision in the province of British Columbia, Canada. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 54: 71-91.
33. Mann RE, Hanson RK, Thornton D (2010) Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sex Abuse 22: 191-217.
34. Mossman D (1994) Assessing predictions of violence: being accurate about accuracy. J Consult Clin Psychol 62: 783-792.
35. Muche R, Ring C, Ziegler C (2005) Entwicklung und Validierung von Prognosemodellen auf Basis der logistischen Regression. Shaker, Aachen.
36. Nedopil N (2005) Prognosen in der Forensischen Psychiatrie. Ein Handbuch für die Praxis. Pabst, Lengerich.
37. Olver ME, Wong SC, Nicholaichuk T, Gordon A (2007) The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychol Assess 19: 318-329.
38. Quinsey VL, Harris GT, Rice ME, Cormier C (2006) Violent offenders: appraising and managing risk. American Psychological Association, Washington.
39. Rehder U, Suhling S (2008) Rückfälligkeit haftentlassener Sexualstraftäter. Monatsschr Kriminol 91: 250-268.
40. Rettenberger M, Eher R (2006) Die deutsche Übersetzung des Static-99 zur aktuarischen Kriminalprognose verurteilter Sexualstraftäter. Monatsschr Kriminol 89: 352-365.
41. Rettenberger M, Gaunersdorfer K, Schilling F, Eher R (2009) Die Vorhersage der Rückfälligkeit entlassener Sexualstraftäter mittels des Sexual Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG) und dessen Screening Version (SORAG-SV). Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol 3: 318-328.
42. Rettenberger M, Matthes A, Boer DP, Eher R (2010) Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 53: 169-186.
43. Rice ME, Harris GT (1995) Violent recidivism: assessing predictive validity. J Consult Clin Psychol 63: 737-748.
44. Rice ME, Harris GT (2005) Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r. Law Hum Behav 29: 615-620.
45. Seto MC (2005) Is more better? Combining actuarial risk scales to predict recidivism among adult sex offenders. Psychol Assess 17: 156-167.
46. Stadtland C, Hollweg M, Kleindienst N, Dietl J, Reich U, Nedopil N (2005) Risk assessment and prediction of violent and sexual recidivism in sex offenders: long-term predictive validity of four risk assessment instruments. J Forensic Psychiatr Psychol 16: 92-108.
47. Urbaniok F, Rinne T, Held L, Rossegger A, Endrass J (2008) Forensische Risikokalkulationen: Grundlegende methodische Aspekte zur Beurteilung der Anwendbarkeit und Validität verschiedener Verfahren. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 76: 470-477.