Students, teachers, and schools as sources of variability, integrity, and sustainability in implementing progress monitoring

School Psychology Review

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 612-630

  Bolt, Daniel M ^a   Ysseldyke, Jim ^b   Patterson, Michael J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c Renaissance Learning Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951644437     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Chalfant, J. C., & Pysch, M. V. (1989). Teacher assistance teams: Five descriptive studies on 96 teams. Remedial and Special Education, 10(6), 49-58.
2. CTB/McGraw-Hill. (2002). Terra Nova (2nd ed.). Monterey, CA: Author.
3. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52(3), 219-232.
4. Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
5. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network.
6. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Bahr, M. W., Fernstrom, P., & Stecker, P. M. (1990). Prereferral intervention: A prescriptive approach. Exceptional Children, 56, 493-513.
7. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Harris, A. H., & Roberts, P. H. (1996). Bridging the research-to-practice gap with mainstream assistance teams: A cautionary tale. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 244-266.
8. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 204-219.
9. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. S. (2005). Using technology to facilitate and enhance curriculum-based measurement. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology (pp. 618-631). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.
10. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Ferguson, C. D. (1992). Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement using a reading maze task. Exceptional Children, 58, 436-450.
11. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Stecker, P. M. (1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 617-641.
12. Gickling, E. E., & Havertape, J. (1983). Curriculumbased assessment. Minneapolis, MN: National School Psychology Inservice Training Network.
13. Graden, J. L., Casey, A., & Christenson, S. L. (1985). Implementing a prereferral intervention system: Part I. The model. Exceptional Children, 51, 377-384.
14. Grimes, J., & Kurns, S. (2003, December). Response to intervention: Heartland's model of prevention and intervention. National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness to Intervention Symposium, Kansas City.
15. Grimes, J., & Tully, W. D. III (1996). Policy and process: Means to lasting educational change. School Psychology Review, 25, 465-476.
16. Kovaleski, J. F., Gickling, E. E., Morrow, H., & Swank, P. R. (1999). High versus low implementation of instructional support teams: A case for maintaining program fidelity. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 170-183.
17. Lindsley, O. R. (1964). Direct measurement and prosthesis of retarded behavior. Journal of Education, 147, 68-81.
18. McLeod, S., & Ysseldyke, J. (2008). Digital technologies for data-driven school psychologists. In K. Grimes & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 1859-1868). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
19. Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., Slider, N. J., Connell, J. E., Gatti, S. L., Williams, K. L., et al. (2005). Treatment implementation following behavioral consultation in schools: A comparison of three follow-up strategies. School Psychology Review, 34, 87-106. (Pubitemid 40554398)
20. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong Y. K., & Congdon, R. T., Jr. (2004). HLM 6, Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
21. Renaissance Learning. (1998a). Accelerated math. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.
22. Renaissance Learning (1998b). STAR math. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.
23. Reynolds, M. C., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (1992). The knowledge base for special and general education. Remedial and Special Education, 13(5), 6-10.
24. Rock, M. L., & Zigmond, N. (2001). Intervention assistance: Is it substance or symbolism? Preventing School Failure, 45, 153-161.
25. Rosenfield, S. A., & Gravois, T. A. (1996). Instructional consultation teams: Collaborating for change. New York: Guilford Press.
26. Rubinson, F. (2002). Lessons learned from implementing problem-solving teams in urban high schools. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 13, 195-217.
27. Santangelo, T. (2009). Collaborative problem solving effectively implemented, but not sustained: A case for aligning the sun, the moon, and the stars. Exceptional Children, 75(2), 185-209.
28. Spicuzza, R., Ysseldyke, J., Lemkuil, A., Koscioleck, S., Boys, C., Teelucksingh, E. (2001). Effects of using a curriculum-based monitoring system on the classroom instructional environment and math achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 39(6), 521-542. (Pubitemid 33377420)
29. SRA/McGraw-Hill. (1988). Everyday math. Chicago, IL: Authors.
30. Telzrow, C. F., McNamara, K., & Hoflinger, C., L. (2000). Fidelity of problem-solving implementation and relationship to student performance. School Psychology Review, 29, 443-461.
31. Ysseldyke, J., & Bolt, D. M. (2007). Effect of a technology-enhanced continuous progress monitoring system on math achievement. School Psychology Review, 56(3), 453-467.
32. Ysseldyke, J. E., & Christenson, S. L. (1987). Evaluating students' instructional environments. Remedial and Special Education, 8(3), 17-24.
33. Ysseldyke, J. E., & Christenson, S. L. (1998). The instructional environment system-II. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
34. Ysseldyke, J. E., & Christenson, S. L. (2002). Functional assessment of academic environments. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
35. Ysseldyke, J. E., Spicuzza, R., Kosciolek, S., & Boys, C. (2003) Effects of a learning information system on mathematics achievement and classroom structure. Journal of Educational Research, 96(3), 163-174.
36. Ysseldyke, J. E., & Tardrew, S. (2002). Use of a progress monitoring system to enable teachers to differentiate math instruction. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 24(1), 1-28.