Effects of a learning information system on mathematics achievement and classroom structure

Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 163-173

  Ysseldyke, Jim ^a   Kosciolek, Stacey ^a   Boys, Christopher ^a   Spicuzza, Richard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b Minneapolis Public Schools   (United States)

Author keywords

Accelerated math; Learning information system; Mathematics achievement

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037237048     PISSN: 00220671     EISSN: 19400675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220670309598804     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anderson, L. (1984). Attention, tasks and time. In L. W. Anderson (Ed.), Time and school learning (pp. 46-68). New York: St. Martin's Press
2. Beaton, A., Mullis, I., Martin, M., Gonzalez, E., Kelly, D., & Smith, T. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years: lEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Study Center
3. Borg, W. (1980). Time and school learning. In C. Denham & A. Lieberman (Eds.), Time to learn (pp. 33-72). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education
4. Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733
5. Evers, B., & Milgram, J. (2000, May 24). The new consensus in math: Skills matter. Education Week, 19(39), pp. 48, 44
6. Everyday Learning Corporation. (1997). Content by strands. [Brochure], Chicago: Everyday Learning
7. Fisher, C., Berliner, D., Filby, N., Marliave, R., Cohen, L., & Dishaw, M. (1980). Teaching behaviors, academic learning time, and student achievement: An overview. In C. Denham & A. Lieberman (Eds.), Time to learn (pp. 7-32). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education
8. Gettinger, M. (1995). Best practices for increasing academic learning time. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practice in school psychology-III (pp. 943-954). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists
9. Gonzalez, E., Martin, M., & Mullis, I. (1999, June). Research findings from TIMSS. Presentation at the NCSSO-29th Annual National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment, Snowbird, UT
10. Graden, J., Thurlow, J., Ysseldyke, J. (1982). Instructional ecology and academic responding time for students at three levels of teacher-perceived behavioral competence (Research Rep. No. 73). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities
11. Greenwood, C. (1991). Longitudinal analysis of time engagement, and achievement in at-risk versus non-risk students. Exceptional Children, 57, 521-535
12. Greenwood, C., Carta, J., Kamps, D., & Delquadri, J. (1995). Ecobehav-ioral assessment system software: (EBASS) practitioner's manual. Lawrence: University of Kansas, Juniper Gardens Children's Project, Schiefelbusch Institute for Life Span Studies
13. Hall, R., Delquadri, J., Greenwood, C., & Thurston, L. (1980). The importance of opportunity to respond to children's academic success. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas at Lawrence, Juniper Gardens Children's Project
14. Jones, L., Mitchell, K., Pellegrino, J., Wise, L., Forgione, P., & Truby, R. (1999, June). Grading the nation's report card: A forum on the National Academy of Sciences NAEP evaluation. Paper presented at the NCSSO-29th Annual National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment, Snowbird, UT
15. Pressley, M. (1998). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford Press
16. Renaissance Learning Systems, Inc. (1998a). Accelerated Math Computer program. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: RLS
17. Renaissance Learning Systems, Inc. (1998b). Math renaissance: Teachers' handbook. Madison, WI: School Renaissance Institute
18. Rosenshine, B.V., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 376-391). New York: Macmillan
19. Slavin, R., Karweit, N., & Madden, N. (1989). Effective programs for students at risk. Boston: Allyn & Bacon
20. Stallings, J., & Kaskowitz, D. (1974). Follow through classroom observation evaluation 1972-1973. Stanford Research Institute: Menlo Park, CA
21. Stanley, S. O., & Greenwood, C. (1983). Assessing opportunity to respond in classroom environments: How much opportunity to respond does the minority, disadvantaged student receive in school? Exceptional Children, 49, 370-373
22. Stedman, L. C. (1997). International achievement differences: An assessment of a new perspective. Educational Researcher, 26(3), 4-15
23. Tananis, C., & Van Der Ploeg, A. (1999, June). TIMSS in the classroom. Paper presented at the NCSSO-29th Annual National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment, Snowbird, UT
24. U.S. Department of Education. (1998). The condition of education 1998 (Publication No. NCES 98-103). Washington. DC: National Center for Education Statistics
25. The University of Chicago School Mathematics Project. (1998). The University of Chicago School Mathematics Project [Brochure]. Chicago: Author
26. Walberg, H. J. (1984). Families as partners in educational productivity. Phi Delta Kappan, 65, 201-206
27. Ysseldyke, J., & Christensen, S. (1987). Evaluating students' instructional environments. Remedial and Special Education, 8(3), 17-24
28. Ysseldyke, J., & Christensen, S. (1993). The Instructional Environment System-II: A system to identify a student's instructional needs. Longmont, CO: Sopris West