Revisiting the wax plants (Hoya, Marsdenieae, Apocynaceae): Phylogenetic tree using the matK gene and psbA-trnH intergenic spacer

Taxon

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 4-14

  Wanntorp, Livia ^a   Gotthardt, Katherina ^b   Muellner, Alexandra N ^b  

^a SWEDISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Sweden)

^b GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Apocynaceae; Bayesian inference; Hoya; Indomalesian australasian region; Maximum likelihood; Molecular phylogenetics; Parsimony; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BIODIVERSITY; CHLOROPLAST; CLADISTICS; CULTIVATION; DATA SET; DICOTYLEDON; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; HORTICULTURE; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; ORNAMENTAL SPECIES; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TAXONOMY; TOPOLOGY;

AUSTRALIA; SOUTHEAST ASIA;

APOCYNACEAE; MARSDENIEAE;

EID: 79951604049     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.601002     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Blume, C.L. 1848. Rumphia, vol. 4. Leiden: Sulpke.
2. Burton, C.M. 1985. Hoya sections. Hoyan 7: 36-37.
3. Burton, C.M. 1995. A tentative alternative arrangement of Hoya sections. Hoyan 17: 1-12.
4. Burton, C.M. 1996. A tentative alternative arrangement of Hoya sections. Hoyan 18: 1.
5. Cuénoud, P., Savolainen, V., Powell, M., Chatrou, L.W., Grayer, R.J. & Chase, M.W. 2002. Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences. Amer. J Bot. 89: 132-144.
6. Forster, P.I. 1992. Pollination of Hoya australis (Asclepiadaceae) by Ocybadistes walkeri sothis (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Austral. Entomol. Mag. 19: 39-44.
7. Forster, P.I. 1996. A checklist of the Asclepiadaceae of Papuasia. Sci.
8. Hansen, D.M., Olesen, J.M., Mione, T., Johnson, S.D. & Müller, C.B. 2007. Coloured nectar: Distribution, ecology, and evolution of an enigmatic floral trait. Biol. Rev. 82: 83-111.
9. Hipp, A.L., Hall, J.C. & Sytsma, K.J. 2004. Phylogenetic accuracy, congruence between data partitions, and performance of the ILD. Syst. Biol. 53: 81-89.
10. Holmgren, P.K., Holmgren, N.H. & Barnett, L.C. 1990. Index herbariorum, vol. 1, The herbaria of the world. New York: New York Botanical Garden.
11. Hooker, J.D. 1885. Asclepiadeae. Pp. 1-78 in: Hooker, J.D. (ed.), Flora of British India, vol. 4. London: Reeve.
12. Kleijn, D. & Van Donkelaar, R. 2001. Notes on the taxonomy and ecology of the genus Hoya (Asclepiadaceae) in Central Sulawesi. Blumea 46: 457-483.
13. Kloppenburg, R.D. 1993. Hoya sections. Fresno, California: D. Kloppenburg.
14. Kloppenburg, R.D. 2001. Hoya sections-A complete study. Fresno, California: D. Kloppenburg.
15. Kloppenburg, R.D. & Gilding, E. 2001. Eriostemma (Schlechter) Kloppenburg & Gilding. Fraterna 14: 1.
16. Kloppenburg, R.D. & Siar, S.V. 2006. Hoya viracensis Kloppenburg & Siar sp. nova. Fraterna 19(4): 5-7.
17. Kunze, H. & Wanntorp, L. 2008. Corona and anther skirt in Hoya (Apocynaceae, Marsdenieae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 271: 9-17.
18. Livshultz, T. 2000. Systematics and evolution of ant-leaves in the genus Dischidia (Asclepiadaceae) [Abstract]. Botany 2000, Portland, Oregon, 6-10 August 2000. http://2000.botanyconference.org/section13/abstracts/94.shtml.
19. Livshultz, T. 2003. Systematics of Dischidia R. Br. (Apocynaceae, Asclepiadoideae). Dissertation, Cornell University, U.S.A.
20. Mason-Gamer, R.J. & Kellogg, E.A. 1996. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Biol. 45: 524-545.
21. Matile, P. & Alterburger, R. 1998. Rhythms of fragrance emission in flowers. Planta 174: 241-247.
22. Meve, U., Laurente, O., Alejandro, G.J. & Livshultz, T. 2009. Systematics of Clemensiella (Apocynaceae-Asclepioideae). Edinburgh J. Bot. 66: 447-457.
23. Muellner, A.N., Samuel, R., Chase, M.W., Pannell, C.M. & Greger, H. 2005. Aglaia (Meliaceae): An evaluation of taxonomic concepts based on DNA data and secondary metabolites. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 534-543.
24. Ollerton, J. & Liede, S. 1997. Pollination systems in Asclepiadaceae: A survey and preliminary analysis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 62: 593-610.
25. Omlor, R. 1998. Generische Revision der Marsdenieae (Asclepiadaceae). Aachen: Shaker Verlag.
26. Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. 1998. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
27. Potgieter, K. & Albert, V. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships within Apocynaceae s.l. based on trnL intron and trnL-F spacer sequences and propagule characters. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 88: 523-549.
28. Randal, M. 2008. A look at Hoya Sections. Stemma 2(3): 10-52.
29. Reeves, G., Chase, M.W., Goldblatt, P., De Chies, T., Lejeune, B., Fay, M.F., Cox, A.V. & Rudall. P.J. 2001. Molecular systematics of Iridaceae: Evidence from four plastid DNA regions. Amer. J. Bot. 88: 2074-2087.
30. Ronquist, F. & Huelsenback, J.P. 2003. MrBayes: Bayesian Inference of Phylogeny. Manual online. http://mrbayes.csit.fsu.edu.
31. Sang, T., Crawford, D.J. & Stuessy, T.F. 1997. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 84: 1120-1136.
32. Schlechter, R. 1913. Die Asclepiadaceen von Deutsch-Neu-Guinea. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 50: 81-164.
33. Schlechter, R. 1916. Neue Asclepiadaceen von Sumatra und Celebes. Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 34: 1-18.
34. Schumann, K. 1895. Asclepiadaceae. Pp. 289-290 in: Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (eds.), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 4(2). Leipzig: Engelmann.
35. Simmons, M.P. & Ochoterena, H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence- based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49: 369-381.
36. Stamatakis, A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688-2690.
37. Stamatakis, A., Hoover, P. & Rougemont, J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Syst. Biol. 75: 758-771.
38. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
39. Tate, J.A. & Simpson, B.B. 2003. Paraphyly of Tarasa Philippi (Malvaceae) and diverse origins of the polyploid species Syst. Biol. 28: 723-737.
40. The Plant Names Project. 1999. International Plant Names Index. http://www.ipni.org (accessed Nov. 2009).
41. Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. & Higgings, D.G. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 24: 4876-4882.
42. Verhoeven, R.L., Liede, S. & Endress, M. 2004. The tribal position of Fockea and Cibirhiza (Apocynaceae: Asclepiadoideae): Evidence from the pollinium structure and cpDNA sequence data. Grana 42: 70-81.
43. Wanntorp L. 2007. Pollinaria of Hoya (Marsdenieae, Apocynaceae) - shedding light on molecular phylogenetics. Taxon 56: 465-478.
44. Wanntorp L. & Forster, P.I. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships between Hoya and the monotypic genera Madangia, Absolmsia, and Micholitzia (Apocynaceae, Marsdenieae): Insights from flower morphology. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 94: 36-55.
45. Wanntorp L., Kocyan, A. & Renner, S.S. 2006a. Wax plants disentangled: A phylogeny of Hoya (Marsdenieae, Apocynaceae) inferred from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 39: 722-733.
46. Wanntorp, L., Kocyan, A., Van Donkelaar, R. & Renner, S.S. 2006b. Towards a monophyletic Hoya (Marsdenieae, Apocynaceae): Inferences from the chloroplast trnL region and the rbcL-atpB spacer. Syst. Biol. 31: 586-596.
47. Wanntorp, L. & Kunze H. 2009. Identifying synapomorphies in the flowers of Hoya and Dischidia - towards phylogenetic understanding. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 170: 331-342.
48. Whitten, W.M., Williams, N.H. & Chase, M.W. 2000. Subtribal and generic relationships of Maxillarieae (Orchidaceae) with emphasis on Stanhopeinae: Combined molecular evidence. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1842-1856.
49. Wilgenbusch J.C., Warren, D.L. & Swofford, D.L. 2004. AWTY: A system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetic inference. http://ceb.csit.fsu.edu/awty.
50. Yoder, A.D., Irwi, J.A. & Payseur, B.A. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 50: 408-424.