An ILP solution for the gene duplication problem

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 12, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages

  Chang, Wen Chieh ^a   Burleigh, Gordon J ^b   Fernández Baca, David F ^a   Eulenstein, Oliver ^a  

^a Iowa State University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENE DUPLICATIONS; GENE FAMILIES; GENE TREE; INTEGER LINEAR PROGRAMMING; OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; PHYLOGENETIC TREES; PROBLEM INSTANCES; SEED PLANTS; PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES;

BIOLOGY; GENES; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; SEED; BIOINFORMATICS;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

CONIFEROPHYTA; GNETALES; SPERMATOPHYTA;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PLANT; PLANT GENOME; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMICS; PHYLOGENY; PLANTS; PROGRAMMING, LINEAR;

EID: 79951532130     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-S1-S14     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Maddison WP. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol 1997, 46:523-536.
2. Goodman M, Czelusniak J, Moore GW, Romero-Herrera AE, Matsuda G. Fitting the Gene Lineage into its Species Lineage, a parsimony strategy illustrated by cladograms constructed from globin sequences. Syst. Zool 1979, 28:132-163.
3. Guigó R, Muchnik I, Smith TF. Reconstruction of Ancient Molecular Phylogeny. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1996, 6(2):189-213.
4. Slowinski JB, Knight A, Rooney AP. Inferring Species Trees from Gene Trees: A Phylogenetic Analysis of the Elapidae (Serpentes) Based on the Amino Acid Sequences of Venom Proteins. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1997, 8(3):349-362. 10.1006/mpev.1997.0434, 9417893.
5. Bansal MS, Shamir R. A Note on the Fixed Parameter Tractability of the Gene-Duplication Problem. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf. 2010,
6. Bansal MS, Burleigh JG, Eulenstein O, Wehe A. Heuristics for the Gene-Duplication Problem: A Θ(n) Speed-Up for the Local Search. RECOMB, Volume 4453 of LNCS 2007, 238-252.
7. Wehe A, Bansal MS, Burleigh JG, Eulenstein O. Dup-Tree: a program for large-scale phylogenetic analyses using gene tree parsimony. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(13):1540-1541. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn230, 18474508.
8. Page RDM. Extracting Species Trees From Complex Gene Trees: Reconciled Trees And Vertebrate Phylogeny. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2000, 14:89-106. 10.1006/mpev.1999.0676, 10631044.
9. Cotton JA, Page RDM. Going Nuclear: Gene Family Evolution And Vertebrate Phylogeny Reconciled. Proc Biol Sci 2002, 269:1555-1561. 10.1098/rspb.2002.2074, 1691073, 12184825.
10. Martin AP, Burg TM. Perils of Paralogy: Using HSP70 Genes for Inferring Organismal Phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 2002, 51(4):570-587. 10.1080/10635150290069995, 12228000.
11. McGowen MR, Clark C, Gatesy J. The Vestigial Olfactory Receptor Subgenome of Odontocete Whales: Phylogenetic Congruence between Gene-Tree Reconciliation and Supermatrix Methods. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57(4):574-590. 10.1080/10635150802304787, 18686195.
12. Applegate DL, Bixby RE, Chvatal V, Cook WJ. The Traveling Salesman Problem: A Computational Study (Princeton Series in Applied Mathematics). 2007, Princeton University Press.
13. Woeginger GJ. Exact algorithms for NP-hard problems: A survey. Combinatorial OptimizationÂ-Eureka, You Shrink! 2003, 2570/2003:185-207.
14. Doyon JP, Chauve C. Branch-and-Bound Approach for Parsimonious Inference of a Species Tree From a Set of Gene Family Trees. Tech. rep. 2010, LIRMM.
15. Burleigh JG, Bansal MS, Eulenstein O, Vision TJ. Inferring Species Trees From Gene Duplication Episodes. Proc. ACM-BCB 2010, 198-203.
16. Sanderson MJ, McMahon M. Inferring angiosperm phylogeny from EST data with widespread gene duplication. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7(Suppl 1):S3. 10.1186/1471-2148-7-S1-S3, 1796612, 17288576.
17. Brown DG, Harrower IM. Integer Programming Approaches to Haplotype Inference by Pure Parsimony. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf. 2006, 3(2):141-154.
18. Dong J, Fernández-Baca D, McMorris FR. Constructing majority-rule supertrees. Algorithms for Molecular Biology 2010, 5:2. 10.1186/1748-7188-5-2, 2826330, 20047658.
19. Gusfield D. The Multi-State Perfect Phylogeny Problem with Missing and Removable Data: Solutions via Integer-Programming and Chordal Graph Theory. RECOMB 2009, 236-252.
20. Gusfield D, Frid Y, Brown DG. Integer Programming Formulations and Computations Solving Phylogenetic and Population Genetic Problems with Missing or Genotypic Data. COCOON 2007, 51-64.
21. Sridhar S, Lam F, Blelloch GE, Ravi R, Schwartz R. Efficiently finding the most parsimonious phylogenetic tree via linear programming. Int. J. Bioinf. Res. Appl. 2007, 4463:37-48.
22. Chimani M, Rahmann S, Sebastian B. Exact ILP Solutions for Phylogenetic Minimum Flip Problems. Proc. ACM BCB 2010, 147-153.
23. Than C, Nakhleh L. Species Tree Inference by Minimizing Deep Coalescences. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5(9):e1000501. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000501, 2729383, 19749978.
24. Eulenstein O. Vorhersage von Genduplikationen und deren Entwicklung in der Evolution. PhD dissertation 1998, University of Bonn.
25. Semple C, Steel MA. Phylogenetics. 2003, Oxford University Press.
26. Gusfield D. Algorithms on Strings, Trees and Sequences: Computer Science and Computational Biology. 1997, Cambridge University Press.
27. Gusfield D. Efficient algorithms for inferring evolutionary trees. Networks 1991, 21:19-28.
28. Gurobi Optimization, Inc Gurobi Optimization 2.0.2. 2010, Gurobi Optimization, Inc., http://www.gurobi.com/
29. IBM, Inc IBM ILOG CPLEX 12.1. 2009, IBM, Inc., http://www.ibm.com/software/integration/optimization/cplex/
30. Hartmann S, Lu D, Phillips J, Vision TJ. Phytome: a platform for plant comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34(Database issue):D724-D730. 10.1093/nar/gkj045, 1347408, 16381967.
31. Hartmann S, Vision TJ. Using ESTs for phylogenomics: Can one accurately infer a phylogenetic tree from a gappy alignment?. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8:95. 10.1186/1471-2148-8-95, 2359737, 18366758.
32. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(21):2688-2690. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446, 16928733.
33. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1992, 8(3):275-282.
34. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. Distributed by the author 2005,
35. Burleigh JG, Mathews S. Phylogenetic signal in nucleotide data from seed plants: Implications for resolving the seed plant tree of life. Am. J. Bot. 2004, 91(10):1599-1613.
36. Donoghue MJ, Doyle JA. Seed plant phylogeny: Demise of the anthophyte hypothesis?. Current Biology 2000, 10(3):R106-R109. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00304-3, 10679315.
37. Magallón S, Sanderson MJ. Relationships among Seed Plants Inferred from Highly Conserved Genes: Sorting Conflicting Phylogenetic Signals among Ancient Lineages. Am. J. Bot. 2002, 89(12):1991-2006.
38. Mathews S. Phylogenetic relationships among seed plants: Persistent questions and the limits of molecular data. Am. J. Bot. 2009, 96:228-236.
39. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Zanis MJ. Phylogeny of Seed Plants Based on Evidence from Eight Genes. Am. J. Bot. 2002, 89(10):1670-1681.
40. Crane PR. Phylogenetic Analysis of Seed Plants and the Origin of Angiosperms. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 1985, 72:716-793.
41. Doyle JA. Seed Ferns and the Origin of Angiosperms. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 2006, 133:169-209.
42. Doyle JA, Donoghue MJ. Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: An experimental cladistic approach. The Botanical Review 1986, 52(4):321-431.
43. Hilton J, Bateman RM. Pteridosperms are the backbone of seed-plant phylogeny. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 2006, 133:119-168.
44. Nixon KC, Crepet WL, Stevenson DW, Friis EM. A Reevaluation of Seed Plant Phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 1994, 81(3):484-533.
45. Rydin C, Kallersjo M, Friis EM. Seed Plant Relationships and the Systematic Position of Gnetales Based on Nuclear and Chloroplast DNA: Conflicting Data, Rooting Problems, and the Monophyly of Conifers. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2002, 163(2):197-214.
46. Rai HS, Reeves PA, Peakall R, Olmstead RG, Graham SW. Inference of higher-order conifer relationships from a multi-locus plastid data set. Botany 2008, 86:658-669.
47. Braukmann TWA, Kuzmina M, Stefanovic S. Loss of all plastid ndh genes in Gnetales and conifers: extent and evolutionary significance for the seed plant phylogeny. Current Genetics 2009, 55(3):323-337. 10.1007/s00294-009-0249-7, 19449185.
48. de La Torre-Bárcena JE, Egan M, Katari MS, Brenner ED, Stevenson DW, Coruzzi GM, DeSalle R. ESTimating plant phylogeny: lessons from partitioning. BMC Evol. Biol. 2006, 6:48. 1564041, 16776834.
49. de La Torre-Bárcena JE, Kolokotronis SO, Lee EK, Stevenson DW, Brenner ED, Katari MS, Coruzzi GM, DeSalle R. The Impact of Outgroup Choice and Missing Data on Major Seed Plant Phylogenetics Using Genome-Wide EST Data. PLoS ONE 2009, 4(6):e5764. 2685480, 19503618.
50. Burleigh JG, Mathews S. Assessing systematic error in the inference of seed plant phylogeny. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2007, 168(2):125-135.
51. Wu CS, Wang YN, Liu SM, Chaw SM. Chloroplast Genome (cpDNA) of Cycas taitungensis and 56 Cp Protein-coding Genes of Gnetum parvifolium: Insights into CpDNA Evolution and Phylogeny of Extant Seed Plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:1366-1379. 10.1093/molbev/msm059, 17383970.
52. Holland BR, Penny D, Hendy MD. Outgroup Misplacement and Phylogenetic Inaccuracy under a Molecular Clock: A Simulation Study. Syst. Biol. 2003, 52(2):229-238. 10.1080/10635150390192771, 12746148.