Pulse pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during one-lung ventilation for lung surgery using thoracotomy: Randomised controlled study

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 39-44

  Lee, Jong Hwan ^a   Jeon, Yunseok ^b   Bahk, Jae Hyon ^b   Gil, Nam Su ^c   Hong, Deok Man ^b   Kim, Jun Hyun ^b   Kim, Hyun Joo ^b  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^c Seoul National University Boramae Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Anaesthesia; Blood pressure; Cardiac output; Fluid therapy; Thoracoscopy; Thoracotomy

Indexed keywords

HETASTARCH;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ENDOBRONCHIAL VENTILATION; FEMALE; FLUID RESUSCITATION; HEART INDEX; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; LUNG SURGERY; MALE; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SURGICAL PATIENT; THORACOTOMY; TIDAL VOLUME; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIAC OUTPUT; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HETASTARCH; HUMANS; LUNG; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OXYGEN; POSITIVE-PRESSURE RESPIRATION; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; ROC CURVE; THORACOTOMY; TIDAL VOLUME;

EID: 79951471731     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834089cf     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Rocca GD, Costa MG. Preload indexes in thoracic anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2003; 16:69-73. (Pubitemid 36206713)
2. Michard F. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 2005; 103:419-428. (Pubitemid 41076740)
3. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:691-699. (Pubitemid 38340065)
4. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162:134-138. (Pubitemid 30469810)
5. Michard F, Teboul J. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121:2000-2008. (Pubitemid 34634425)
6. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 2007; 35:64-68. (Pubitemid 46035678)
7. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M, et al. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92:984-989. (Pubitemid 32239145)
8. Kramer A, Zygun D, Hawes H, et al. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest 2004; 126:1563-1568. (Pubitemid 39525032)
9. Rex S, Brose S, Metzelder S, et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93:782-788. (Pubitemid 39585607)
10. Reuter DA, Goepfert MS, Goresch T, et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness during open chest conditions. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94:318-323. (Pubitemid 40352851)
11. Wiesenack C, Fiegl C, Keyser A, et al. Assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22:658-665. (Pubitemid 41297547)
12. Lee J, Kim J, Yoon SZ, et al. Evaluation of corrected flow time in oesophageal Doppler as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99:343-348. (Pubitemid 47316387)
13. Huang C, Fu J, Hu H, et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:2810-2816.
14. Michard F, Teboul JL. Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 2000; 4:282-289.
15. Reuter D, Bayerlein J, Goepfert MS, et al. Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:476-480. (Pubitemid 36379453)
16. Oliveira R, Azevedo L, Park M, Schettino GP. Influence of ventilatory settings on static and functional haemodynamic parameters during experimental hypovolaemia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009; 26:66-72.
17. De Backer D, Taccone FS, Holsten R, et al. Influence of respiratory rate on stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 2009; 110:1092-1097.
18. Rex S, Schälte G, Schroth S, et al. Limitations of arterial pulse pressure variation and left ventricular stroke volume variation in estimating cardiac preload during open heart surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51:1258-1267. (Pubitemid 47389690)
19. de Waal EE, Rex S, Kruitwagen CL, et al. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:510-515.
20. Sentürk M. New concepts of the management of one-lung ventilation. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2006; 19:1-4. (Pubitemid 43269469)
21. Lohser J. Evidence-based management of one-lung ventilation. Anesthesiol Clin 2008; 26:241-272. (Pubitemid 351635909)
22. Slinger PD, Campos JH. Anesthesia for thoracic surgery. In: Miller RD, editor. Miller's Anesthesia, 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2009. pp. 1819-1887.
23. Baillard C, Cohen Y, Fosse JP, et al. Haemodynamic measurements (continuous cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance) in critically ill patients: transoesophageal Doppler versus continuous thermodilution. Anaesth Intensive Care 1999; 27:33-37. (Pubitemid 29086237)
24. Leone D, Servillo G, De Robertis E, et al. Monitoring cardiac output: esophageal doppler vs thermodilution. Minerva Anestesiol 1998; 64:351-356.
25. Monnet X, Chemla D, Osman D, et al. Measuring aortic diameter improves accuracy of esophageal Doppler in assessing fluid responsiveness. Crit Care Med 2007; 35:477-482. (Pubitemid 46148538)
26. Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I, et al. Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 2001; 119:867-873. (Pubitemid 32197661)
27. Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A, et al. Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:1734-1739. (Pubitemid 39297176)
28. Preisman S, DiSegni E, Vered Z, Perel A. Left ventricular preload and function during graded haemorrhage and retranfusion in pigs: analysis of arterial pressure waveform and correlation with echocardiography. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:716-718. (Pubitemid 34498604)
29. Perner A, Faber T. Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50:1068-1073. (Pubitemid 44434744)