Influence of ventilatory settings on static and functional haemodynamic parameters during experimental hypovolaemia

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 66-72

  Oliveira, Raquel Hermes ^a,b   Cesar Pontes Azevedo, Luciano ^a,b   Park, Marcelo ^a,b   Paula Pinto Schettino, Guilherme ^a,b  

^a HOSPITAL SÍRIO LIBANÊS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Hypovolaemia; Mechanical ventilation; Physiological monitoring; Swine

Indexed keywords

AIRWAY PRESSURE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEART VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC PRESSURE; HEMODYNAMICS; HYPOVOLEMIA; NONHUMAN; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PULMONARY ARTERY OCCLUSION PRESSURE; PULSE PRESSURE; SWINE; THORAX PRESSURE; TIDAL VOLUME; ANIMAL; BLOOD; DISEASE MODEL; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY;

ANIMALS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; HEMODYNAMICS; HYPOVOLEMIA; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; SWINE;

EID: 64849108012     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328319bf5e     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Teboul JL, Besbes M, Andrivet P, et al. A bedside index assessing the reliability of pulmonary occlusion pressure measurements during mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure. J Crit Care 1992; 7: 22-29.
2. Teboul JL, Pinsky MR, Mercat A, et al. Estimating cardiac filling pressures in mechanically ventilated patients with hyperinflation. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 3631-3636.
3. Cheatham ML, Nelson LD, Chang MC, Safcsak K. Right ventricular end-diastolic volume index as a predictor of preload status in patients on positive end-expiratory pressure. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 1801-1806.
4. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121: 2000-2008.
5. Bendjelid K, Romand JR. Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 352-360.
6. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, et al. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 1313-1321.
7. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134-138.
8. Reuter DA, Goepfert MS, Goresch T, et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness during open chest conditions. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 318-323.
9. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, et al. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 517-523.
10. Reuter D, Bayerlein J, Goepfert MS, et al. Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 476-480.
11. Hannon JP, Bossone CA, Wade CE. Normal physiological values for conscious pigs used in biomedical research. Lab Anim Sci 1990; 40: 293-298.
12. O'Quinn R, Marini JJ. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure: clinical physiology, measurement and interpretation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983; 128: 319-326.
13. Yu M,Takiguchi S,Takanishi D, et al. Evaluation of the clinical usefulness of thermodilution volumetric catheters. Crit Care Med 1995; 23: 681 -686.
14. Wagner JG, Leatherman JW. Right ventricular end-diastolic volume as a predictor of the hemodynamic response to a fluid challenge. Chest 1998; 113: 1048-1054.
15. Kubitz JC, Kemming GI, Schuilthei G, et al. The influence of PEEP and tidal volume on central blood volume. EurJAnaesthesiol2006; 23: 954-961.
16. Michard F, ChemlaD, Richard C, et al. Clinical useofrespiratorychangesin arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159: 935-939.
17. Fujita Y, Yamamoto T, Sano I, et al. A comparison of changes in cardiac preload variables during graded hypovolemia and hypervolemia in mechanically ventilated dogs. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 1780-1786.
18. Kramer A, Zygun D, Hawes H, et al. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest 2004; 126: 1563-1568.
19. ReuterDA, Goresch T, GoepfertM, et al.Effectsofmid-linethoracotomyon the interaction between mechanical ventilation and cardiac filling during cardiac surgery. Br JAnaesth 2004; 92: 808-813.
20. Morgan BC, Martin WE, Hornbein TF, et al. Hemodynamic effects of intermittent positive pressure respiration. Anesthesiology1966; 27: 584-590.
21. Vieillard-Baron A, Loubieres Y, Schmitt JM, et al. Cyclic changes in right ventricular output impedance during mechanical ventilation. JApplPhysiol 1999; 87: 1644-1650.
22. Jardin F, Farcot JC, Gueret P, et al. Cyclic changes in arterial pulse during respiratory support. Circulation 1983; 68: 266-274.
23. TheresH, Binkau J, LauleM, et al.Phase-related changesin rightventricular cardiacoutputundervolume-controlled mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 953-958.
24. LambertP, Sloth E, Smith B, et al. Does apositive end-expiratorypressure- induced reduction in stroke volume indicate preload responsiveness? An experimental study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51 : 415-425.
25. Renner J, Cavus E, Meybohm P, et al. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during different loading conditions in a paediatric animal model. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008; 52: 374-380.
26. Nakakuki S. Bronchial tree, lobular division and blood vessels of pig lung. J Vet Med Sci 1994; 56: 685-689.
27. De Robertis E, Liu JM, Blomquist S. Elastic properties of the lung and the chest wall in young and adult healthy pigs. Eur Respir J 2001; 17: 703-711.
28. Amato MBP, Barbas CSV, Medeiros DM, et al. Effect of a protective- ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 347-354.
29. Pinksy MR. Recent advances in the clinical application of heart-lung interactions. Curr Opin Crit Care 2002; 8: 26-31.