Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and interpretation times for a standard and an advanced 3D visualisation technique in CT colonography

European Radiology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 653-662

  Mang, Thomas ^b   Kolligs, Frank T ^a   Schaefer, Claus ^a   Reiser, Maxmilian F ^a   Graser, Anno ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Klinikum Grosshadern ^*

Author keywords

Colorectal polyps; CT colonography; Panoramic view; Three dimensional evaluation; Virtual colonoscopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLON ADENOMA; COLON MUCOSA; COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STUDENT T TEST; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AUSTRIA; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WORKLOAD;

EID: 79751534686     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1953-x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. SA Taylor A Laghi P Lefere S Halligan J Stoker 2007 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography Eur Radiol 17 575 579 10.1007/s00330-006-0407-y 16967260 (Pubitemid 46140331)
2. CD Johnson MH Chen AY Toledano, et al. 2008 Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers N Engl J Med 359 1207 1217 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtFGjt7fI 10.1056/NEJMoa0800996 18799557
3. D Regge C Laudi G Galatola, et al. 2009 Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer Jama 301 2453 2461 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD1MXnsFWgurw%3D 10.1001/jama.2009.832 19531785
4. T Yasumoto T Murakami H Yamamoto, et al. 2006 Assessment of two 3D MDCT colonography protocols for observation of colorectal polyps AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 85 89 10.2214/AJR.04.1727 16357383 (Pubitemid 46110024)
5. JG Fletcher CD Johnson JE Reed J Garry 2001 Feasibility of planar virtual pathology: a new paradigm in volume-rendered CT colonography J Comput Assist Tomogr 25 864 869 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnmsFygsw%3D%3D 10.1097/00004728-200111000- 00006 11711796 (Pubitemid 33091661)
6. FM Vos RE van Gelder IW Serlie, et al. 2003 Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection Radiology 228 878 885 10.1148/radiol.2283020846 12954902 (Pubitemid 37025502)
7. SH Kim JM Lee HW Eun, et al. 2007 Two- versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography Radiology 244 852 864 10.1148/radiol.2443060934 17709833 (Pubitemid 47292098)
8. PJ Pickhardt AJ Taylor DV Gopal 2006 Surface visualization at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: degree of coverage and implications for polyp detection Gastroenterology 130 1582 1587 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.01.044 16697721 (Pubitemid 43668840)
9. B Geiger C Chefd'hotel S Sudarsky 2005 Panoramic views for virtual endoscopy Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 8 Pt 1 662 669 (Pubitemid 43828307)
10. E Christensen 2007 Methodology of superiority vs. equivalence trials and non-inferiority trials J Hepatol 46 947 954 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.02.015 17412447 (Pubitemid 46546604)
11. A Graser P Stieber D Nagel, et al. 2009 Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population Gut 58 241 248 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M%2FmtFGqsA%3D%3D 10.1136/gut.2008.156448 18852257
12. A Graser BJ Wintersperger C Suess MF Reiser CR Becker 2006 Dose reduction and image quality in MDCT colonography using tube current modulation AJR Am J Roentgenol 187 695 701 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28rgtlKlsw%3D%3D 10.2214/AJR.05.0662 16928932 (Pubitemid 44651492)
13. PJ Pickhardt JR Choi I Hwang, et al. 2003 Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults N Engl J Med 349 2191 2200 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXps1SqtL0%3D 10.1056/NEJMoa031618 14657426 (Pubitemid 37485135)
14. ME Zalis MA Barish JR Choi, et al. 2005 CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal Radiology 236 3 9 10.1148/radiol.2361041926 15987959 (Pubitemid 40853289)
15. M Macari EJ Bini SL Jacobs N Lange YW Lui 2003 Filling defects at CT colonography: pseudo- and diminutive lesions (the good), polyps (the bad), flat lesions, masses, and carcinomas (the ugly) Radiographics 23 1073 1091 10.1148/rg.235035701 12975501 (Pubitemid 37414723)
16. PJ Pickhardt AD Lee AJ Taylor, et al. 2007 Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 1451 1456 10.2214/AJR.07.2291 18029884 (Pubitemid 350174811)
17. E Neri F Vannozzi P Vagli A Bardine C Bartolozzi 2006 Time efficiency of CT colonography: 2D vs 3D visualization Comput Med Imaging Graph 30 175 180 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2006.03.003 16730160 (Pubitemid 43817480)
18. PJ Pickhardt 2007 Screening CT colonography: how I do it AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 290 298 10.2214/AJR.07.2136 17646453 (Pubitemid 47195912)
19. AC Silva CV Wellnitz AK Hara 2006 Three-dimensional virtual dissection at CT colonography: unraveling the colon to search for lesions Radiographics 26 1669 1686 10.1148/rg.266055199 17102043
20. JE East BP Saunders D Boone D Burling S Halligan SA Taylor 2008 Uni- and bidirectional wide angle CT colonography: effect on missed areas, surface visualization, viewing time and polyp conspicuity Eur Radiol 18 1910 1917 10.1007/s00330-008-0969-y 18414869
21. JE East BP Saunders D Burling D Boone S Halligan SA Taylor 2007 Surface visualization at CT colonography simulated colonoscopy: effect of varying field of view and retrograde view Am J Gastroenterol 102 2529 2535 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01429.x 17640320 (Pubitemid 47631767)
22. PJ Pickhardt C Schumacher DH Kim 2009 Polyp detection at 3-dimensional endoluminal computed tomography colonography: sensitivity of one-way fly-through at 120 degrees field-of-view angle J Comput Assist Tomogr 33 631 635 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31819778ea 19638863
23. SS Lee SH Park JK Kim, et al. 2009 Panoramic endoluminal display with minimal image distortion using circumferential radial ray-casting for primary three-dimensional interpretation of CT colonography Eur Radiol 19 1951 1959 10.1007/s00330-009-1362-1 19290529
24. H Hoppe C Quattropani A Spreng J Mattich P Netzer HP Dinkel 2004 Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results AJR Am J Roentgenol 182 1151 1158 15100110 (Pubitemid 38525505)
25. MS Juchems TR Fleiter S Pauls SA Schmidt HJ Brambs AJ Aschoff 2006 CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps Eur Radiol 16 68 72 10.1007/s00330-005-2805-y 16402257 (Pubitemid 43103570)
26. PJ Pickhardt 2005 CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy) for primary colorectal screening: challenges facing clinical implementation Abdom Imaging 30 1 4 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FitVKqtQ%3D%3D 10.1007/s00261-004-0243-y 15647864 (Pubitemid 40169501)
27. T Mang P Peloschek C Plank, et al. 2007 Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography Eur Radiol 17 2598 2607 10.1007/s00330-007-0608-z 17351780
28. JA Soto MA Barish J Yee 2005 Reader training in CT colonography: how much is enough? Radiology 237 26 27 10.1148/radiol.2371050003 16183923 (Pubitemid 41346142)
29. J van Dam P Cotton CD Johnson, et al. 2004 AGA future trends report: CT colonography Gastroenterology 127 970 984 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.07.003 15362051 (Pubitemid 39208428)
30. SA Taylor S Halligan D Burling, et al. 2004 CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance Eur Radiol 14 1025 1033 10.1007/s00330-004-2262-z 14872280 (Pubitemid 38787248)
31. Lenhart DK, Babb J, Bonavita J, et al (2010) Comparison of a unidirectional panoramic 3D endoluminal interpretation technique to traditional 2D and bidirectional 3D interpretation techniques at CT colonography: preliminary observations. Clin Radiol 65:118-125
32. H Brenner M Hoffmeister G Brenner L Altenhofen U Haug 2009 Expected reduction of colorectal cancer incidence within 8 years after introduction of the German screening colonoscopy programme: estimates based on 1, 875, 708 screening colonoscopies Eur J Cancer 45 2027 2033 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.02.017 19289271