Comparison of a unidirectional panoramic 3D endoluminal interpretation technique to traditional 2D and bidirectional 3D interpretation techniques at CT colonography: preliminary observations

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 118-125

  Lenhart, D K ^a   Babb, J ^a   Bonavita, J ^a   Kim, D ^a   Bini, E J ^b   Megibow, A J ^a   Macari, M ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REFERENCE STANDARDS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 73649098240     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Johnson C.D., Chen M.H., Toledano A.Y., et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenoma and cancers. N Engl J Med 359 (2008) 1207-1217
2. Kim D.H., Pickhardt P.J., Taylor A.J., et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 357 (2007) 1403-1412
3. An S., Lee K.H., Kim Y.H., et al. Screening CT colonography in an asymptomatic average-risk Asian population: a 2-year experience in a single institution. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191 (2008) W100-W106
4. Levin B., Lieberman D.A., McFarland B., et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the multi-Society task force on colorectal cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58 (2008) 1-31
5. Dachman A.H., Kuniyoshi J.K., Boyle C.M., et al. CT colonography with three- dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171 (1998) 989-995
6. Macari M., Milano A., Lavelle M., et al. Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two-dimensional and three dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174 (2000) 1543-1549
7. Pickhardt P.J., Choi J.R., Hwang I., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349 (2003) 2191-2200
8. Pickhardt P.J., Lee A.D., Taylor A.J., et al. Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 (2007) 1451-1456
9. Johnson K.T., Johnson C.D., Fletcher J.G., et al. CT colonography using 3600 virtual dissection: a feasibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 (2006) 90-95
10. Hoppe H., Quattropani C., Spreng A., et al. Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretaion and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182 (2004) 1151-1158
11. Geiger B., Chefd'Hotel C., and Sudarsky S. Panoramic views for virtual endoscopy. MICCAI (2005) 662-669
12. Landis J.R., and Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1977) 159-174
13. Macari M., Bini E.J., Xue X., et al. Prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multislice CT colonography to conventional colonoscopy in detecting colorectal polyps and cancers. Radiology 224 (2002) 383-392
14. Barish M.A., Soto J.A., and Ferrucci J.T. Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184 (2005) 786-792
15. Cotton P.B., Durkalski V.L., Pineau B.C., et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy)--a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291 (2004) 1713-1719
16. Rockey D.C., Paulson E., Niedzwiecki D., et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365 (2005) 305-311