Polyp detection at 3-dimensional endoluminal computed tomography colonography: Sensitivity of one-way fly-through at 120 degrees field-of-view angle

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 631-635

  Pickhardt, Perry J ^a   Schumacher, Clark ^a   Kim, David H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

3D visualization; CT colonography; Polyps; Screening; Virtual colonoscopy

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

3-DIMENSIONAL; 3-DIMENSIONAL VISUALIZATION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY COLONOGRAPHY; CT COLONOGRAPHY; ENDOLUMINAL; FIELD OF VIEWS; POLYP; POLYP DETECTION; VIEW ANGLES; VIRTUAL COLONOSCOPY;

ENDOSCOPY;

ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POLYP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RECTUM POLYP; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 68949122631     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31819778ea     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1403Y1412.
2. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2191Y2200.
3. Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Gopal DV. Surface visualization at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: Degree of coverage and implications for polyp detection. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1582Y1587.
4. Carrascosa P, Capunay C, Lopez EM, et al. Multidetector CT colonoscopy: evaluation of the perspective-filet view virtual colon dissection technique for the detection of elevated lesions. Abdom Imaging. 2007;32:582Y588.
5. Hoppe H, Quattropani C, Spreng A, et al. Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: Preliminary results. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:1151Y1158.
6. Juchems MS, Fleiter TR, Pauls S, et al. CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:68Y72.
7. Kim SH, Lee JM, Eun HW, et al. Two-versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography. Radiology. 2007;244:852Y864.
8. Silva AC, Wellnitz CV, Hara AK. Three-dimensional virtual dissection at CT colonography: Unraveling the colon to search for lesions. Radiographics. 2006;26:1669Y1686.
9. Vos FM, van Gelder RE, Serlie IWO, et al. Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: Conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection. Radiology. 2003;228:878Y885.
10. Schumacher C, Pickhardt PJ, Hinshaw JL, et al. Effect of the Field-of-View Angle on 3D Endoluminal Surface Coverage at CT Colonography. In: RSNA Scientific Assembly. Chicago, IL, 2007.
11. Pickhardt PJ. Screening CT colonography: how I do it. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:290Y298.
12. Cash BD, Kim C, Jensen D, et al. Accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:A92.
13. Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. Prospective comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and fecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut. 2009;58:241Y248.
14. Pickhardt PJ. Three-dimensional endoluminal CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): Comparison of three commercially available systems. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:1599Y1606.
15. Macari M, Milano A, Lavelle M, et al. Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two-and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1543Y1549.
16. Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, MacCarty RL, et al. Effect of slice thickness and primary 2D versus 3D virtual dissection on colorectal lesion detection at CT colonography in 452 asymptomatic adults. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:672Y680.