Effects of electrical stimulation on the acoustically evoked auditory-nerve response in guinea pigs with a high-frequency hearing loss

Hearing Research

Volumn 272, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 95-107

  Stronks, H Christiaan ^a   Versnel, Huib ^a   Prijs, Vera F ^a   Grolman, Wilko ^a   Klis, Sjaak F L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY MASKING; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA; COCHLEA POTENTIAL; COMPOUND ACTION POTENTIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; GUINEA PIG; HEARING LOSS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR MICROPHONIC POTENTIALS; COCHLEAR NERVE; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FEMALE; FUROSEMIDE; GUINEA PIGS; HEARING LOSS, HIGH-FREQUENCY; KANAMYCIN; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79751528564     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.10.012     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abbas P.J., Miller C.A. Biophysics and physiology. Cochlear Implants: Auditory Prostheses and Electric Hearing 2004, 149-212. Springer, New York. F.-G. Zeng, A.N. Popper (Eds.).
2. Adunka O., Kiefer J., Unkelbach M.H., Lehnert T., Gstoettner W. Development and evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation. Laryngoscope 2004, 114:1237-1241.
3. Agterberg M.J.H., Versnel H., De Groot J.C.M.J., Van den Broek M., Klis S.F.L. Chronic electrical stimulation does not prevent spiral ganglion cell degeneration in deafened guinea pigs. Hear. Res. 2010, 269:169-179.
4. Ball L.L. Electrically induced potentiation of eighth nerve responses. J. Aud. Res. 1982, 22:107-130.
5. Biedron S., Westhofen M., Ilgner J. On the number of turns in human cochleae. Otol. Neurotol. 2009, 30:414-417.
6. Brummett R.E., Brown R.T., Himes D.L. Quantitative relationships of the ototoxic interaction of kanamycin and ethacrynic acid. Arch. Otolaryngol. 1979, 105:240-246.
7. Charlet de Sauvage R., Cazals Y., Erre J.P., Aran J.M. Acoustically derived auditory nerve action potential evoked by electrical stimulation: an estimation of the waveform of single unit contribution. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1983, 73:616-627.
8. Coco A., Epp S.B., Fallon J.B., Xu J., Millard R.E., Shepherd R.K. Does cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation affect residual hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons?. Hear. Res. 2007, 225:60-70.
9. Cohen N.L. Cochlear implant candidacy and surgical considerations. Audiol. Neurootol. 2004, 9:197-202.
10. De Groot J.C.M.J., Veldman J.E., Huizing E.H. An improved fixation method for guinea pig cochlear tissues. Acta Otolaryngol. 1987, 104:234-242.
11. Dodson H.C. Loss and survival of spiral ganglion neurons in the guinea pig after intracochlear perfusion with aminoglycosides. J. Neurocytol. 1997, 26:541-556.
12. Eggermont J.J. Analysis of compound action potential responses to tone bursts in the human and guinea pig cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1976, 60:1132-1139.
13. Evans E.F. The frequency response and other properties of single fibres in the guinea-pig cochlear nerve. J. Physiol. 1972, 226:263-287.
14. Fraysse B., Macias A.R., Sterkers O., Burdo S., Ramsden R., Deguine O., Klenzner T., Lenarz T., Rodriguez M.M., Von Wallenberg E., James C. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant. Otol. Neurotol. 2006, 27:624-633.
15. Frijns J.H.M., Briaire J.J., Grote J.J. The importance of human cochlear anatomy for the results of modiolus-hugging multichannel cochlear implants. Otol. Neurotol. 2001, 22:340-349.
16. Gantz B.J., Turner C., Gfeller K.E. Acoustic plus electric speech processing: preliminary results of a multicenter clinical trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid implant. Audiol. Neurootol. 2006, 11(Suppl. 1):63-68.
17. Gantz B.J., Turner C., Gfeller K.E., Lowder M.W. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 2005, 115:796-802.
18. Gantz B.J., Hansen M.R., Turner C.W., Oleson J.J., Reiss L.A., Parkinson A.J. Hybrid 10 clinical trial: preliminary results. Audiol. Neurootol. 2009, 14(Suppl. 1):32-38.
19. Goldstein M.H., Kiang N.Y.-S. Synchrony of neural activity in electric responses evoked by transient acoustic stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1958, 30:107-114.
20. Gstoettner W.K., van de Heyning P., O'Connor A.F., Morera C., Sainz M., Vermeire K., McDonald S., Cavalle L., Helbig S., Valdecasas J.G., Anderson I., Adunka O.F. Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a multi-centre investigation. Acta Otolaryngol. 2008, 128:968-975.
21. Javel E. Shapes of cat auditory nerve fiber tuning curves. Hear. Res. 1994, 81:167-188.
22. Kiang N.Y.S., Sachs M.B., Peake W.T. Shapes of tuning curves for single auditory-nerve fibers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1967, 42:1341-1342.
23. Kirk D.L., Yates G.K. Evidence for electrically evoked travelling waves in the guinea pig cochlea. Hear. Res. 1994, 74:38-50.
24. Macherey O., Carlyon R.P., van Wieringen A., Deeks J.M., Wouters J. Higher sensitivity of human auditory nerve fibers to positive electrical currents. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2008, 9:241-251.
25. McAnally K.I., Brown M., Clark G.M. Estimating mechanical responses to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear. Res. 1997, 106:146-153.
26. Miller C.A., Abbas P.J., Rubinstein J.T., Robinson B.K., Matsuoka A.J., Woodworth G. Electrically evoked compound action potentials of guinea pig and cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation. Hear. Res. 1998, 119:142-154.
27. Nuttall A.L., Ren T. Electromotile hearing: evidence from basilar membrane motion and otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 1995, 92:170-177.
28. Olson A.D., Shinn J.B. A systematic review to determine the effectiveness of using amplification in conjunction with cochlear implantation. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 2008, 19:657-671.
29. Romand R., Romand M.R. The spiral ganglion. Ultrastructural Atlas of the Inner Ear 1984, 165-183. Butterworths, London. I. Friedmann, J. Ballantyne (Eds.).
30. Stengs C.H.M., Klis S.F.L., Huizing E.H., Smoorenburg G.F. Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity; electrophysiological evidence of spontaneous recovery in the albino guinea pig. Hear. Res. 1997, 111:103-113.
31. Stronks H.C., Aarts M.C.H., Klis S.F.L. Effects of isoflurane on auditory evoked potentials in the cochlea and brainstem of guinea pigs. Hear. Res. 2010, 260:20-29.
32. Stronks H.C., Versnel H., Prijs V.F., Klis S.F.L. Suppression of the acoustically evoked auditory-nerve response by electrical stimulation in the cochlea of the guinea pig. Hear. Res. 2010, 259:64-74.
33. Talbot K.N., Hartley D.E.H. Combined electro-acoustic stimulation: a beneficial union?. Clin. Otolaryngol. 2008, 33:536-545.
34. Turner C., Gantz B.J., Reiss L. Integration of acoustic and electrical hearing. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2008, 45:769-778.
35. Turner C.W., Reiss L.A.J., Gantz B.J. Combined acoustic and electric hearing: preserving residual acoustic hearing. Hear. Res. 2008, 242:164-171.
36. Van Deelen G.W., Smoorenburg G.F. Electrocochleography for different electrode positions in guinea pig. Acta Otolaryngol. 1986, 101:207-216.
37. Van den Honert C., Stypulkowski P.H. Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. Hear. Res. 1987, 29:195-206.
38. Van Ruijven M.W.M., De Groot J.C.M.J., Smoorenburg G.F. Time sequence of degeneration pattern in the guinea pig cochlea during cisplatin administration. A quantitative histological study. Hear. Res. 2004, 197:44-54.
39. Versnel H., Agterberg M.J.H., de Groot J.C.M.J., Smoorenburg G.F., Klis S.F.L. Time course of cochlear electrophysiology and morphology after combined administration of kanamycin and furosemide. Hear. Res. 2007, 231:1-12.
40. West B.A., Brummett R.E., Himes D.L. Interaction of kanamycin and ethacrynic acid. Severe cochlear damage in guinea pigs. Arch. Otolaryngol. 1973, 98:32-37.
41. Wilson B.S., Dorman M.F. Cochlear implants: current designs and future possibilities. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2008, 45:695-730.
42. Wilson B.S., Finley C.C., Lawson D.T., Wolford R.D., Eddington D.K., Rabinowitz W.M. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 1991, 352:236-238.
43. Wysocki J. Topographical anatomy of the guinea pig temporal bone. Hear. Res. 2005, 199:103-110.
44. Xu S.A., Shepherd R.K., Chen Y., Clark G.M. Profound hearing loss in the cat following the single co-administration of kanamycin and ethacrynic acid. Hear. Res. 1993, 70:205-215.
45. Xue S., Mountain D.C., Hubbard A.E. Electrically evoked basilar membrane motion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1995, 97:3030-3041.