IT project management control and the Control Objectives for IT and related Technology (CobiT) framework

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 325-336

  Bernroider, Edward W N ^a   Ivanov, Milen ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

Author keywords

CobiT; IT controlling; IT project management; IT project performance management; Programme management

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY LEVELS; COBIT; CONTROL OBJECTIVES; GENERIC NATURE; INTERNAL CONTROLS; IT CONTROLLING; IT PROJECT; MANAGEMENT CONTROL; MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM; MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONALS; PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT; PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT; PROJECT ASSESSMENT; PROJECT QUALITY;

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 79651474140     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Agarwal N., Rathod U. Defining "success" for software projects: an exploratory revelation. International Journal of Project Management 2006, 24(4):358-370.
2. Anbari F.T., Carayannis E.G., Voetsch R.J. Post-project reviews as a key project management competence. Technovation 2008, 28(10):633-643.
3. Atkinson R. Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management 1999, 17(6):337-342.
4. Boritz J.E. Is practitioners' views on core concepts of information integrity. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 2005, 6(4):260-279.
5. Bowen P.L., Cheung M.-Y.D., Rohde F.H. Enhancing it governance practices: a model and case study of an organization's efforts. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 2007, 8(3):191-221.
6. Brown A.W., Adams J.D., Amjad A.A. The relationship between human capital and time performance in project management: a path analysis. International Journal of Project Management 2007, 25(1):77-89.
7. Bryde D.J. Modelling project management performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 2003, 20(2):229-254.
8. Cheung S.O., Suen H.C.H., Cheung K.K.W. Ppms: a web-based construction project performance monitoring system. Automation in Construction 2004, 13(3):361-376.
9. DeWitt A. Measurement of project management success. International Journal of Project Management 1998, 6(3):164-170.
10. Flamholtz E.G., Das T.K., Tsui A.S. Toward an interative framework of organizational control. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1985, 10(1):35-50.
11. Flowerday S., Blundell A.W., Von Solms R. Continuous auditing technologies and models: a discussion. Computers & Security 2006, 25(5):325-331.
12. Gray C.F., Larson E.W. Project management-the managerial process 2008, McGraw-Hill Irwin, London. 4 ed.
13. Hardy G. Using it governance and CobiT to deliver value with it and respond to legal, regulatory and compliance challenges. Information Security Technical Report 2006, 11(1):55-61.
14. Henderson J.C., Lee S. Managing i/s design teams: a control theories perspective. Management Science 1992, 38(6):757-777.
15. ISACA CobiT-4th Edition (Version 4.1) 2008, Information Systems Audit and Control Foundation, IT Governance Institute, Rolling Meadows, USA. 3 ed.
16. ITGI It Governance Global Status Report 2008, IT Governance Institute, Rolling Meadows.
17. Jha K.N., Iyer K.C. Commitment, coordination, competence and the iron triangle. International Journal of Project Management 2007, 25(5):527-540.
18. Jin X.-H., Ling F.Y.Y. Key relationship-based determinants of project performance in china. Building and Environment 2006, 41(7):915-925.
19. Kordel L. It governance hands-on: using CobiT to implement it governance. The Information Systems Control Journal 2004, (2):39-46.
20. Lindkvist L. Project organization: exploring its adaptation properties. International Journal of Project Management 2008, 26(1):13-20.
21. Liu J.Y.-C., Chen H.H.-G., Jiang J.J., Klein G. Task completion competency and project management performance: the influence of control and user contribution. International Journal of Project Management 2010, 28(3):220-227.
22. Maylor H. Project Management 2005, vol. 3. Prentice Hall, London.
23. Melnyk S.A., Stewart D.M., Swink M. Metrics and performance measurement in operations management: dealing with the metrics maze. Journal of Operation Management 2004, (22):209-217.
24. Milosevic D., Patanakul P. Standardized project management may increase development projects success. International Journal of Project Management 2005, 23(3):181-192.
25. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric Theory 1978, McGraw-Hill, New York.
26. O'Donnell E. Discussion of director responsibility for it governance: a perspective on strategy. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 2004, 5(2):101-104.
27. PCAOB Auditing standard no. 5-an audit of internal control over financial reporting that is integrated with an audit of financial statements 2007, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.
28. Project-Management-Institute-Inc. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge: Pmbok Guide 2004, Project Management Institute Inc., Pennsylvania, USA. 3 ed.
29. Qureshi T.M., Warraich A.S., Hijazi S.T. Significance of project management performance assessment (pmpa) model. International Journal of Project Management 2009, 27(4):378-388.
30. Ridley G., Young J., Carroll P. Studies to evaluate CobiT's contribution to organisations: opportunities from the literature, 2003-06. Australian Accounting Review 2008, 18(4):334-342.
31. Teece D.J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 1997, 18(7):509-533.
32. The-Standish-Group The 2009 chaos report 2009, Standish Group International.
33. Tukel O.I., Rom W.O. An empirical investigation of project evaluation criteria. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 2001, 3(21):400-416.
34. Tuttle B., Vandervelde S.D. An empirical examination of CobiT as an internal control framework for information technology. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 2007, (8):240-263.
35. US-Congress Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (No. H. R. 3763) 2002, One Hundred Seventh Congress of the United States of America, Washington.
36. van Donk D.P., Molloy E. From organising as projects to projects as organisations. International Journal of Project Management 2008, 26(2):129-137.
37. Zahra S.A., George G. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extention. Academy of Management Review 2002, 27(2):185-203.