Significance of project management performance assessment (PMPA) model

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 378-388

  Qureshi, Tahir Masood ^a   Warraich, Aamir Shahzad ^a   Hijazi, Syed Tahir ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Models; Performance; Performance assessment; Project; Project management; Quality; TQM

Indexed keywords

PERFORMANCE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PROJECT; QUALITY; TQM;

MODEL CHECKING; PERMANENT MAGNETS;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; CORRELATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 64049118036     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Atkinson R. Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. Int J Project Manage 17 6 (1999) 337-343
2. Barad M., and Raz T. Contribution of quality management tools and practices to project management performance. Int J Quality Reliab Manage 17 4/5 (2000) 571-583
3. Bowen, and Dean J.W. Management theory and total quality: improving research and practice through theory development. The Acad Manage Rev 19 3 (1994)
4. Bryde J.D. Underpinning modern project management with TQM principles. TQM Mag 9 3 (1997) 231-238
5. Bryde J.D. Modelling project management performance. Int J Quality Reliab Manage 20 2 (2003) 225-229
6. Bryde J.D. Project management concepts, methods and application. Int J Operat Product Manage 23 7 (2003) 775-793
7. BSI, BSI BS EN ISO 10006. Quality management and guidelines to quality in project management, BSI, London; 1995.
8. Cammarano J. Project management: how to make it happen. IIE Solut 29 12 (1997) 30-34
9. Crosby P. Quality is free: the art of making quality certain (1979), McGraw-Hill, London p. 25-40
10. Daft R.L. Management. 4th ed. (1997), The Dryden Press, Fort Worth, TX
11. Dale B.G., Boarden R.J., and Lascelles D.M. Total quality management. In: Dale B.G. (Ed). Managing quality. 2nd ed. (1994), Prentice-Hall, Hemel Hempstead 3-13
12. Deutsch M.S. An exploratory analysis relating the software project management process to project success. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 38 4 (1991) 365-375
13. DeWitt A. Measurement of project management success. Int J Project Manage 6 3 (1998) 164-170
14. Evans J.R., and Lindsay W.M. The management and control of quality. 2nd ed. (1993), West Publishing Company, St. Paul, MN
15. Froonhof H. Quality in project management, Newsletter, October, International Project Management Association; 1995.
16. Garvin D.A. Managing quality: a strategic and competitive edge (1988), The Free Press, New York, NY
17. Hides M.T., Irani Z., Polychronakis I., and Sharp J.M. Facilitating total quality through effective project management. Int J Quality Reliab Manage 17 4/5 (2000) 407-422
18. Humphrey W.S. Managing the software process (1989), Addison-Wesley, Wokingham p. 414
19. Jain A. Project management maturity model - a new outlook. In: Proceedings of the 14th World congress of project management, vol. 1; 1998. p. 223-9.
20. Kerzner H. The growth of modern project management. Project Manage J 25 2 (1994) 6-8
21. Kotnour T. Organizational learning practices in the project management environment. Int J Quality Reliab Manage 17 4/5 (2000) 393-406
22. Kumar C.C.P., and Wolf C. Assessing project quality. AACE Trans 2 (1992) I.5.1-I.5.11
23. Gobelli D.H., and Larson E.W. Significance of project management structure on development success. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 36 2 (1989) 119-125
24. Loo R. Training in project management: a powerful tool for improving individual and team performance. Team Perform Manage: An Int J 2 3 (1996) 6-14
25. Mallak L.A., Patzak G.R., and Kursted Jr. H.A. Satisfying stakeholders for successful project management. Comput Indust Eng 21 1-4 (1991) 429-433
26. Maylor H. Beyond the Gantt chart: project management moving on. Eur Manage J 19 2 (2001) 92-100
27. Maylor H. Project management. Financial Times Management, London; 1999. p. 11-49.
28. Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., and Wood D.J. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manage Rev 22 4 (1997) 853-886
29. Neumann F.E., Glockner P.W., Hite R., and Taylor G.L. Generating a golden glow. Res Technol Manage 36 4 (1993) 12-13
30. Nicholas J.M. Successful project management: a force-field analysis. J Syst Manage 40 1 (1989) 24-30 36
31. Oakland J.S. TQM text with cases. 2nd ed. (2000), Butterworth-Heinemann, London p. 4
32. Pelligrinelli S., and Bowman C. Implementing strategy through projects. Long Range Plan 27 4 (1994) 125-132
33. Pinto M.B., and Pinto J.K. Determinants of cross-functional cooperation in the project implementation process. Project Manage J 20 4 (1991) 13-20
34. PMI, A guide to the project management body of knowledge, Project Management Institute, Darby, PA; 1996.
35. Stamatis D.H. Total quality management and project management. Project Manage J 25 3 (1994) 48-54
36. Tukel O.I., and Rom W.O. An empirical investigation of project evaluation criteria. Int J Operat Product Manage 21 3 (2001) 400-416
37. Tuman J. Models for achieving project success through team building and stakeholder management. In: Dinsmore PG (Ed.), The AMA handbook of project management, AMACOM, New York, NY; 1993. p. 207-23.
38. Van der Wiele A., Dale B.G., and Williams A.R.T. ISO 9000 series registration to total quality management: the transformation journey. Int J Quality Sci 2 4 (1997) 236-252
39. Ward JL. Using the project management maturity model to target project management improvements. In: Proceedings of the 14th World congress on project management, vol. 2; 1998, p. 867-72.
40. Wateridge J. IT projects: a basis for success. Int J Project Manage 13 3 (1995) 169-172