Alternative methods of accounting for underreporting and overreporting when measuring dietary intake-obesity relations

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 173, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 448-458

  Mendez, Michelle A ^a,b,j   Popkin, Barry M ^c   Buckland, Genevieve ^b   Schroder, Helmut ^d,k   Amiano, Pilar ^e,j   Barricarte, Aurelio ^f,j   Huerta, José María ^g,j   Quirós, José R ^h,j   Sánchez, María José ^i,j   González, Carlos A ^b  

^a HOSPITAL DEL MAR   (Spain)

^b CATALAN INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY   (Spain)

^c University of North Carolina   (United States)

^d INST MUNIC D INVESTIGACIO MEDICA   (Spain)

^e BIODONOSTIA HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Spain)

^f INSTITUTO DE SALUD PÚBLICA DE NAVARRA   (Spain)

^g DEPARTMENT OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Spain)

^h Public Health and Health Planning Directorate   (Spain)

ⁱ ANDALUSIAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Spain)

^j CIBER EPIDEMIOLOGÍA Y SALUD PÚBLICA CIBERESP   (Spain)

^k Instituto de Salud Carlos III   (Spain)

more..

Author keywords

body mass index; energy intake; fruit; obesity; vegetables

Indexed keywords

BIOENERGETICS; BODY MASS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA SET; DIET; METABOLISM; OBESITY; VEGETABLE;

ACCOUNTING; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BASAL METABOLIC RATE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; CALORIC INTAKE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIETARY INTAKE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ENERGY EXPENDITURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEOPLASM; NORMAL HUMAN; NUTRITION; OBESITY;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BODY MASS INDEX; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DIET RECORDS; ENERGY INTAKE; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SELF DISCLOSURE; SPAIN;

EID: 79551705779     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: 14766256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq380     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Livingstone MB, Black AE. Markers of the validity of reported energy intake. J Nutr. 2003;133(suppl 3):895S-920S. (Pubitemid 36262798)
2. Mendez MA, Wynter S, Wilks R, et al. Under- and overreporting of energy is related to obesity, lifestyle factors and food group intakes in Jamaican adults. Public Health Nutr. 2004;7(1):9-19. (Pubitemid 38294523)
3. Lissner L. Measuring food intake in studies of obesity. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5(6A):889-892.
4. Heitmann BL, Lissner L, Osler M. Do we eat less fat, or just report so? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24(4): 435-442. (Pubitemid 30198096)
5. Ferrari P, Slimani N, Ciampi A, et al. Evaluation of under- and overreporting of energy intake in the 24-hour diet recalls in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Public Health Nutr. 2002;5(6B):1329-1345. (Pubitemid 36313622)
6. Tooze JA, Subar AF, Thompson FE, et al. Psychosocial predictors of energy underreporting in a large doubly labeled water study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(5):795-804. (Pubitemid 41103880)
7. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (Macronutrients). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2002.
8. Schatzkin A, Kipnis V, Carroll RJ, et al. A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarkerbased Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32(6):1054-1062. (Pubitemid 38072695)
9. Subar AF, Kipnis V, Troiano RP, et al. Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the OPEN study. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158(1): 1-13. (Pubitemid 36745325)
10. Black AE, Cole TJ. Biased over- or under-reporting is characteristic of individuals whether over time or by different assessment methods. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101(1):70-80. (Pubitemid 33712700)
11. Trabulsi J, Schoeller DA. Evaluation of dietary assessment instruments against doubly labeled water, a biomarker of habitual energy intake. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 281(5):E891-E899.
12. Newby PK. Plant foods and plant-based diets: protective against childhood obesity? Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(5):1572S-1587S.
13. Buckland G, Bach A, Serra-Majem L. Obesity and the Mediterranean diet: a systematic review of observational and intervention studies. Obes Rev. 2008;9(6):582-593.
14. Tohill BC, Seymour J, Serdula M, et al. What epidemiologic studies tell us about the relationship between fruit and vegetable consumption and body weight. Nutr Rev. 2004;62(10): 365-374. (Pubitemid 39331069)
15. Samuel-Hodge CD, Fernandez LM, Henŕquez-Roldán CF, et al. A comparison of self-reported energy intake with total energy expenditure estimated by accelerometer and basal metabolic rate in African-American women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(3):663-669. (Pubitemid 38280530)
16. Black AE. Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake: basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24(9):1119-1130.
17. McCrory MA, McCrory MA, Hajduk CL, et al. Procedures for screening out inaccurate reports of dietary energy intake. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5(6A):873-882. (Pubitemid 36313631)
18. Goldberg GR, Black AE, Jebb SA, et al. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify underrecording. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1991;45(12):569-581.
19. Macdiarmid JI, Vail A, Cade JE, et al. The sugar-fat relationship revisited: differences in consumption between men and women of varying BMI. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998;22(11):1053-1061. (Pubitemid 28486595)
20. Howarth NC, Huang TT, Roberts SB, et al. Dietary fiber and fat are associated with excess weight in young and middleaged US adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105(9):1365-1372. (Pubitemid 41223953)
21. Black AE. The sensitivity and specificity of the Goldberg cutoff for EI: BMR for identifying diet reports of poor validity. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000;54(5):395-404. (Pubitemid 30261390)
22. Huang TT, Roberts SB, Howarth NC, et al. Effect of screening out implausible energy intake reports on relationships between diet and BMI. Obes Res. 2005;13(7):1205-1217.
23. González CA, Pera G, Quirós JR, et al. Types of fat intake and body mass index in a Mediterranean country. Public Health Nutr. 2000;3(3):329-336.
24. EPIC Group of Spain. Relative validity and reproducibility of a diet history questionnaire in Spain. I. Foods. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26(suppl 1):S91-S99.
25. Haftenberger M, Lahmann PH, Panico S, et al. Overweight, obesity and fat distribution in 50- to 64-year-old participants in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Public Health Nutr. 2002;5(6B): 1147-1162. (Pubitemid 36313610)
26. Wareham NJ, Jakes RW, Rennie KL, et al. Validity and repeatability of a simple index derived from the short physical activity questionnaire used in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Public Health Nutr. 2003;6(4):407-413. (Pubitemid 36749764)
27. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Human Energy Requirements: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/ ONU Expert Consultation. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2001.
28. Horgan GW, Stubbs J. Predicting basal metabolic rate in the obese is difficult. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57(2):335-340. (Pubitemid 36240489)
29. Alfonzo-González G, Doucet E, Alméras N, et al. Estimation of daily energy needs with the FAO/WHO/UNU 1985 procedures in adults: comparison to whole-body indirect calorimetry measurements. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;58(8): 1125-1131. (Pubitemid 39172386)
30. Frankenfield D, Roth-Yousey L, Compher C. Comparison of predictive equations for resting metabolic rate in healthy nonobese and obese adults: a systematic review. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105(5):775-789. (Pubitemid 40754446)
31. Tooze JA, Schoeller DA, Subar AF, et al. Total daily energy expenditure among middle-aged men and women: the OPEN Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86(2):382-387. (Pubitemid 47256922)
32. Willett WC. Nutritional Epidemiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.
33. Rolls BJ, Drewnowski A, Ledikwe JH. Changing the energy density of the diet as a strategy for weight management. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105(5 suppl 1):S98-S103. (Pubitemid 40615762)
34. Poslusna K, Ruprich J, de Vries JH, et al. Misreporting of energy and micronutrient intake estimated by food records and 24 hour recalls, control and adjustment methods in practice. Br J Nutr. 2009;101(suppl 2):S73-S85.
35. de Castro JM. Varying levels of food energy self-reporting are associated with between-group, but not withinsubject, differences in food intake. J Nutr. 2006;136(5): 1382-1388.
36. Bingham S, Luben R, Welch A, et al. Epidemiologic assessment of sugars consumption using biomarkers: comparisons of obese and nonobese individuals in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer Norfolk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(8):1651-1654. (Pubitemid 47294833)
37. Bingham S, Luben R, Welch A, et al. Associations between dietary methods and biomarkers, and between fruits and vegetables and risk of ischaemic heart disease, in the EPIC Norfolk Cohort Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37(5):978-987.
38. Prentice RL, Shaw PA, Bingham SA, et al. Biomarkercalibrated energy and protein consumption and increased cancer risk among postmenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169(8):977-989.
39. Cust AE, Smith BJ, Chau J, et al. Validity and repeatability of the EPIC physical activity questionnaire: a validation study using accelerometers as an objective measure. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:33. (doi:10.1186/1479-5868- 5-33).
40. Stamatakis E, Hillsdon M, Primatesta P. Domestic physical activity in relationship to multiple CVD risk factors. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(4):320-327.
41. Prentice RL. Dietary assessment and the reliability of nutritional epidemiology research reports. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(9):583-585.
42. Bingham SA, Luben R,Welch A, et al. Are imprecise methods obscuring a relation between fat and breast cancer? Lancet. 2003;362(9379):212-214. (Pubitemid 36859940)