Colonic polyps: Application value of computer-aided detection in computed tomographic colonography

Chinese Medical Journal

Volumn 124, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 380-384

  Zhang, Hui Mao ^a   Guo, Wei ^a   Liu, Gui Feng ^a   An, Dong Hong ^a   Gao, Shuo Hui ^a   Sun, Li Bo ^a   Yang, Hai Shan ^a  

^a JILIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Colonography; Computed tomography; Computer aided detection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; CHINESE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RADIOLOGIST; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79551700682     PISSN: 03666999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2011.03.011     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Summers RM. Polyp size measurement at CT colonography: what do we know and what do we need to know? Radiology 2010; 255: 707-720.
2. Burling D, Wylie P, Gupta A, Illangovan R, Muckian J, Ahmad R, et al. CT colonography:accuracy of initial interpretation by radiographers in routine clinical practice. Clin Radiol 2010; 65: 126-132.
3. Christensen KN, Fidler JL, Fletcher JG, Maccarty R, Johnson CD. Pictorial review of colonic polyp and mass distortion and recognition with the CT virtual dissection technique. Radiographics 2010; 30: 1148-1164.
4. Liedenbaum MH, Denters MJ, de Vries AH, van Ravesteijn VF, Bipat S, Vos FM, et al. Low-fiber diet in limited bowel preparation for CT colonography: Influence on image quality and patient acceptance. Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195: W31-W37.
5. Luo M, Shan H, Zhou K. CT virtual colonoscopy in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy. Chin Med J 2002; 115: 1023-1026.
6. Park SH, Kim SY, Lee SS. Sensitivity of CT colonography for nonpolypoid colorectal lesions interpreted by human readers and with computer-aided detection. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 70-78.
7. Taylor SA, Brittenden J, Lenton J, Lambie H, Goldstone A, Wylie PN, et al. Influence of computer-aided detection false-positives on reader performance and diagnostic confidence for CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 1682-1689.
8. Li J, Huang A, Yao J, Liu J, Van Uitert RL, Petrick N, et al. Optimizing computer-aided colonic polyp detection for CT colonography by evolving the Pareto fronta. Med Phys 2009; 36: 201-212.
9. Dachman AH, Obuchowski NA, Hoffmeister JW, Hinshaw JL, Frew MI, Winter TC, et al. Effect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trial. Radiology 2010; 256: 827-835.
10. Suzuki N, Ignjatovic A, Burling D, Taylor SA. CT colonography and non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2010; 20: 565-572.
11. Wi JY, Kim SH, Lee JY, Kim SG, Han JK, Choi BI. Electronic cleansing for CT colonography: does it help CAD software performance in a high-risk population for colorectal cancer? Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 1905-1916.
12. Wei J, Chan HP, Sahiner B. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms: dual system approach with two-view analysis. Med Phys 2009; 36: 4451-4460.
13. Sahiner B, Chan HP, Hadjiiski LM. Effect of CAD on radiologists' detection of lung nodules on thoracic CT scans: analysis of an observer performance study by nodule size. Acad Radiol 2009; 16: 1518-1530.
14. Zhu H, Liang Z, Pickhardt PJ, Barish MA, You J, Fan Y, et al. Increasing computer-aided detection specificity by projection features for CT colonography. Med Phys 2010; 37: 1468-1481.
15. Lawrence EM, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Robbins JB. Colorectal polyps: stand-alone performance of computer-aided detection in a large asymptomatic screening population. Radiology 2010; 256: 791-798.
16. Bielen D, Kiss G. Computer-aided detection for CT colonography: update 2007. Abdom Imaging 2007; 32: 571-581.
17. Yao J, Li J, Summers RM. Employing topographical height map in colonic polyp measurement and false positive reduction. Pattern Recognit 2009; 42: 1029-1040.
18. Suuzuk K, Rockey DC, Dachman AH. CT colonography: advanced computer-aided detection scheme utilizing MTANNs for detection of "missed" polyps in a multicenter clinical trial. Med Phys 2010; 37: 12-21.
19. Summers RM, Handwerker LR, Pickhardt PJ, Van Uitert RL, Deshpande KK, Yeshwant S, et al. Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population. Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 168-174.
20. Hein PA, Krug LD, Romano VC, Kandel S, Hamm B, Rogalla P. Computer-aided detection in computed tomography colonography with full fecal tagging: comparison of standalone performance of 3 automated polyp detection systems. Can Assoc Radiol J 2010; 61: 102-108.
21. Regge D, Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Laghi A, Zullo A, Kim DH, et al. Impact of computer-aided detection on the cost-effectiveness of CT colonography. Radiology 2009; 250: 488-497.
22. Shi R, Schraedley-Desmond P, Napel S. CT colonography: influence of 3D viewing and polyp candidate features on interpretation with computer-aided detection. Radiology 2006; 239: 768-776.