Low-fiber diet in limited bowel preparation for CT colonography: Influence on image quality and patient acceptance

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 195, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Liedenbaum, Marjolein H ^a   Denters, Maaike J ^a   De Vries, Ayso H ^a   Van Ravesteijn, Vincent F ^b   Bipat, Shandra ^a   Vos, Frans M ^a,b   Dekker, Evelien ^a   Stoker, Jaap ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bowel preparation; Colorectal carcinoma; Colorectal polyps; CT colonography; Low fiber diet

Indexed keywords

IODINE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GOLYTELY; ISOTONIC SOLUTION; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; MEGLUMINE IOTALAMATE; MEGLUMINE IOXITALAMATE; MOVIPREP;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENSITY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIET; FECES; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTESTINE PREPARATION; LOW FIBER DIET; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIETARY FIBER; INTESTINE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCULT BLOOD; RADIOGRAPHY;

CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIETARY FIBER; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTESTINES; IOTHALAMATE MEGLUMINE; ISOTONIC SOLUTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCULT BLOOD; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77954692025     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3572     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut 2009; 58:241-248
2. Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 2005; 237:893-904
3. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:1207-1217
4. Regge D, Laudi C, Galatola G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA 2009; 301:2453-2461
5. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Saunders BP, Bassett P, Vance M, Bartram CI. Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. AJR 2003; 181:913-921 (Pubitemid 37151766)
6. van Gelder RE, Birnie E, Florie J, et al. CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study. Radiology 2004; 233:328-337
7. Bielen D, Thomeer M, Vanbeckevoort D, et al. Dry preparation for virtual CT colonography with fecal tagging using water-soluble contrast medium: initial results. Eur Radiol 2003; 13:453-458
8. Callstrom MR, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, et al. CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. Radiology 2001; 219:693-698
9. Johnson KT, Carston MJ, Wentz RJ, Manduca A, Anderson SM, Johnson CD. Development of a cathartic-free colorectal cancer screening test using virtual colonoscopy: a feasibility study. AJR 2007; 188:145; [web]W29-W36
10. Lefere PA, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck BG. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results - polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 2002; 224:393-403
11. Zalis ME, Perumpillichira JJ, Magee C, Kohlberg G, Hahn PF. Tagging-based, electronically cleansed CT colonography: evaluation of patient comfort and image readability. Radiology 2006; 239:149-159
12. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2004; 127:1300-1311
13. Jensch S, de Vries AH, Pot D, et al. Image quality and patient acceptance of four regimens with different amounts of mild laxatives for CT colonography. AJR 2008; 191:158-167
14. Dachman AH, Dawson DO, Lefere P, et al. Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study. Abdom Imaging 2007; 32:96-104 (Pubitemid 46742700)
15. Bliss DZ, Jung HJ, Savik K, et al. Supplementation with dietary fiber improves fecal incontinence. Nurs Res 2001; 50:203-213 (Pubitemid 33603810)
16. Chen HL, Haack VS, Janecky CW, Vollendorf NW, Marlett JA. Mechanisms by which wheat bran and oat bran increase stool weight in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 68:711-719
17. McRorie J, Kesler J, Bishop L, et al. Effects of wheat bran and Olestra on objective measures of stool and subjective reports of GI symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95:1244-1252
18. Schaller D. Fiber content and structure in foods. Am J Clin Nutr 1978; 31[suppl]:S99-S102
19. Hellstrom M, Brolin I. Dietary fibers in the preparation of the bowel for diagnostic barium enema. Gastrointest Radiol 1987; 12:76-78
20. Kember PG, McBride KD, Tweed CS, Collins MC. A blinded prospective trial of low-residue versus normal diet in preparation for barium enema. Br J Radiol 1995; 68:128-129
21. Fork FT. Wheat fibre before radiography of the large bowel. Acta Radiol 1988; 29:375
22. Lee JR, Ferrando JR. Variables in the preparation of the large intestine for double contrast barium enema examination. Gut 1984; 25:69-72
23. Virkki R, Makela P. Low residual diet and hydration improving double contrast examination of the colon. Eur J Radiol 1983; 3:212-214
24. Denters MJ, Deutekom M, Fockens P, Bossuyt PM, Dekker E. Implementation of population screening for colorectal cancer by repeated fecal occult blood test in the Netherlands. BMC Gastroenterol 2009; 9:28
25. Van Rossum LG, Van Rijn AF, Laheij RJ, et al. Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2008; 135:82-90
26. Liedenbaum MH, van Rijn AF, de Vries AH, et al. Using CT colonography as a triage technique after a positive faecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening. Gut 2009; 58:1242-1249
27. Dachman AH, Zalis ME. Quality and consistency in CT colonography and research reporting. Radiology 2004; 230:319-323
28. Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000; 47:251-255
29. de Vries AH, Venema HW, Florie J, Nio CY, Stoker J. Influence of tagged fecal material on detectability of colorectal polyps at CT: phantom study. AJR 2008; 191:1101; [web]W181-W189
30. Slater A, Taylor SA, Burling D, Gartner L, Scarth J, Halligan S. Colonic polyps: effect of attenuation of tagged fluid and viewing window on conspicuity and measurement - in vitro experiment with porcine colonic specimen. Radiology 2006; 240:101-109 (Pubitemid 43902599)
31. Johnson CD, Manduca A, Fletcher JG, et al. Noncathartic CT colonography with stool tagging: performance with and without electronic stool subtraction. AJR 2008; 190:361-366
32. Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Baekelandt M, Van HB. Laxative-free CT colonography. AJR 2004; 183:945-948
33. Kendrick RG, MacKenzie S, Beckly DE. A comparison of four methods of bowel preparation for barium enema. Clin Radiol 1981; 32:95-97