Computer-aided Detection in Computed Tomography Colonography with Full Fecal Tagging: Comparison of Standalone Performance of 3 Automated Polyp Detection Systems

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 102-108

  Hein, Patrick A ^a   Krug, Lasse D ^a   Romano, Valentina C ^a   Kandel, Sonja ^a   Hamm, Bernd ^a   Rogalla, Patrik ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computer aided detection; CT colonography; Fecal tagging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FECES ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LESIONS AND DEFECTS; MALE; POLYP; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; CONTRAST MEDIA; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FECES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IOHEXOL; IRRIGATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77949490422     PISSN: 08465371     EISSN: 08465371     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.carj.2009.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Yee J., Akerkar G.A., Hung R.K., et al. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 219 (2001) 685-692
2. Pickhardt P.J., Choi J.R., Hwang I., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349 (2003) 2191-2200
3. Van Gelder R.E., Nio C.Y., Florie J., et al. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 127 (2004) 41-48
4. Cotton P.B., Durkalski V.L., Pineau B.C., et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291 (2004) 1713-1719
5. Halligan S., Altman D.G., Taylor S.A., et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 237 (2005) 893-904
6. Johnson C.D., Chen M.H., Toledano A.Y., et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 359 (2008) 1207-1217
7. Ferrucci J., Barish M., Choi R., et al. Working Group on Virtual Colonoscopy. Virtual colonoscopy. JAMA 292 (2004) 431-432
8. Zalis M.E., Barish M.A., Choi J.R., et al. Working Group on Virtual Colonoscopy. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236 (2005) 3-9
9. Taylor P., and Potts H.W. Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate. Eur J Cancer 44 (2008) 798-807
10. Wiemker R., Rogalla P., Blaffert T., et al. Aspects of computer-aided detection (CAD) and volumetry of pulmonary nodules using multislice CT. Br J Radiol 78 (2005) 46-56
11. Fletcher J.G., Booya F., Summers R.M., et al. Comparative performance of two polyp detection systems on CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 (2007) 277-282
12. Rogalla P., Lembcke A., Rückert J.C., et al. Spasmolysis at CT colonography: butyl scopolamine versus glucagon. Radiology 236 (2005) 184-188
13. Levin B., Lieberman D.A., McFarland B., et al. American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group; US Multi-Society Task Force; American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58 (2008) 130-160
14. Näppi J., Okamura A., Frimmel H., et al. Region-based supine-prone correspondence for the reduction of false-positive CAD polyp candidates in CT colonography. Acad Radiol 12 (2005) 695-707
15. Näppi J., and Yoshida H. Adaptive correction of the pseudo-enhancement of CT attenuation for fecal-tagging CT colonography. Med Image Anal 12 (2008) 413-426
16. O'Connor S.D., Summers R.M., Yao J., et al. CT colonography with computer-aided polyp detection: volume and attenuation thresholds to reduce false-positive findings owing to the ileocecal valve. Radiology 241 (2006) 426-432
17. Summers R.M., Yao J., Pickhardt P.J., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology 129 (2005) 1832-1844
18. Summers R.M., Handwerker L.R., Pickhardt P.J., et al. Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191 (2008) 168-174
19. Kiss G., Van Cleynenbreugel J., Thomeer M., et al. Computer-aided diagnosis in virtual colonography via combination of surface normal and sphere fitting methods. Eur Radiol 12 (2002) 77-81
20. Jerebko A., Lakare S., Cathier P., et al. Symmetric curvature patterns for colonic polyp detection. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 9 (2006) 169-176
21. Halligan S., Taylor S.A., Dehmeshki J., et al. Computer-assisted detection for CT colonography: external validation. Clin Radiol 61 (2006) 758-765
22. Halligan S., Altman D.G., Mallett S., et al. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 131 (2006) 1690-1699
23. Petrick N., Haider M., Summers R.M., et al. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study. Radiology 246 (2008) 148-156
24. Taylor S.A., Charman S.C., Lefere P., et al. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software. Radiology 246 (2008) 463-471