Effects of context novelty vs. familiarity on latent inhibition with a conditioned taste aversion procedure

Behavioural Processes

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 242-249

  Quintero, E ^a   Diaz E ^a   Vargas, J P ^a   Schmajuk, N ^b   Lopez J C ^a   De la Casa, L G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Context change; Home cage; Latent inhibition; Novelty

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HOME RANGE; INHIBITION; NUMERICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CAGE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; LATENT INHIBITION; LEARNING; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; STIMULUS; TASTE AVERSION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; AVOIDANCE LEARNING; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENT; MALE; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SACCHARIN; TASTE;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 79551689800     PISSN: 03766357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.12.011     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Best M.R., Meachum C.L. The effects of stimulus preexposure on taste mediated environmental conditioning: potentiation and overshadowing. Anim. Learn Behav. 1986, 140:1-5.
2. Bouton M.E. Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychol. Bull. 1993, 114:80-99.
3. Chamizo V.D. Ausencia de especificidad contextual de la inhibición latente en la aversión condicionada. Psicologica 1996, 17:307-322.
4. De la Casa L.G., Lubow R.E. An empirical analysis of the super-latent inhibition effect. Anim. Learn Behav. 2002, 30:112-120.
5. De la Casa L.G., Pineño O. Inter-stage context and time as determinants of latent inhibition. Latent Inhibition: Cognition, Neuroscience and Applications to Schizophrenia 2010, 40-61. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. R.E. Lubow, I. Weiner (Eds.).
6. De la Casa L.G., Timberlake W. Effects of preexposure and retention interval placement on latent inhibition and perceptual learning in a choice-maze discrimination task. Learn Behav. 2006, 34:193-201.
7. De la Casa L.G., Díaz E., Lubow R.E. Delay-induced attenuation of latent inhibition with a conditioned emotional response depends on CS-US strength. Learn Motiv. 2005, 36:60-76.
8. De la Casa L.G., Marquez R., Lubow R.E. Super-latent inhibition of conditioned taste preference with a long retention interval. Learn Motiv. 2009, 40:329-342.
9. Grahame N.J., Barnet R.C., Gunther L.M., Miller R.R. Latent inhibition as a performance deficit resulting from CS-context associations. Anim. Learn Behav. 1994, 22:395-408.
10. Hall G., Channell S. Differential effects of contextual change on latent inhibition and on the habituation of an orienting response. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. B 1985, 11:470-481.
11. Hall G., Channell S. Context specificity of latent inhibition in taste aversion learning. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B 1986, 38:121-139.
12. Hall G., Honey R.C. Contextual effects in conditioning, latent inhibition, and habituation: associative and retrieval functions of contextual cues. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. B 1989, 15:232-241.
13. Hall G., Minor H. A search for context-stimulus associations in latent inhibition. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B 1984, 35:145-169.
14. Hall G., Symonds M. Overshadowing and latent inhibition of context aversion conditioning in the rat. Auton. Neurosci. 2006, 129:42-49.
15. Kaye H., Preston G.C., Szabo L., Druiff H., Mackintosh N.J. Context specificity of conditioning and latent inhibition: evidence for a dissociation of latent inhibition and associative interference. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B 1987, 39:127-145.
16. Kurz E.M., Levitsky D.A. Novelty of contextual cues in taste aversion learning. Anim. Learn Behav. 1982, 10:229-232.
17. Lovibond P.E., Preston G.C., Mackintosh N.J. Context specificity of conditioning, extinction and latent inhibition. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. B 1984, 10:360-375.
18. Lubow R.E. Conditioned taste aversion and latent inhibition: a review. Conditioned Taste Aversion. Behavioral and Neural Processes 2008, 37-57. Oxford University Press Inc., New York. S. Reilly, T.R. Schachtman (Eds.).
19. Lubow R.E., De la Casa L.G. There is a time and a place for everything: bi-directional modulations of latent inhibition by time-induced context differentiation. Psychon. B Rev. 2005, 12:806-821.
20. Lubow R.E., Moore A.U. Latent inhibition: the effect of non-reinforced preexposure to the conditional stimulus. J. Comp. Physiol. Psych. 1959, 52:415-419.
21. Lubow R.E., Weiner I. Latent Inhibition: Cognition, Neuroscience and Applications to Schizophrenia 2010, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Lubow R.E., Rifkin B., Alek M. The context effect: the relationship between stimulus preexposure and environmental preexposure determines subsequent learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. B 1976, 2:38-47.
23. Manrique T., Molero A., Ballesteros M.A., Moron I., Gallo M., Fenton A. Time of day-dependent latent inhibition of conditioned taste aversions in rats. Neurobiol. Learn Mem. 2004, 82:77-80.
24. McLaren I.P.L., Bennett C., Plaisted K., Aitken M., Mackintosh N.J. Latent inhibition, context specificity, and context familiarity. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B 1994, 47:387-400.
25. Miller R.R., Matzel L.D. The comparator hypothesis: a response rule for the expression of associations. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (vol. 22) 1988, 51-92. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. G.H. Bower (Ed.).
26. Miller R.R., Kasprow W., Schachtman T. Retrieval variability: sources and consequences. Am. J. Psychol. 1986, 99:145-218.
27. Pearce J.M., Hall G. A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not unconditioned stimuli. Psychol. Rev. 1980, 82:532-552.
28. Revusky S. The role of interference in association over a delay. Animal Memory 1971, 155-213. Academic Press, New York. W. Honig, P.H.R. James (Eds.).
29. Schmajuk N.A. Brain-behaviour relationships in latent inhibition: a computational model. Neurosci. Biobehav. R 2005, 29:1001-1029.
30. Schmajuk N.A., Lam Y.W., Gray J.A. Latent inhibition: a neural network approach. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. B 1996, 22:321-349.
31. Wagner A.R. SOP: a model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. Information Processing in Animals: Memory Mechanisms 1981, 5-47. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J. N.E. Spear, R.R. Miller (Eds.).
32. Westbrook R.F., Jones M.L., Bailey G.K., Harris J.A. Contextual control over conditioned responding in a latent inhibition paradigm. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. B 2000, 26:157-173.
33. Wheeler D.S., Stout S.C., Miller R.R. Interaction of retention interval with CS-preexposure and extinction effects: symmetry with respect to primacy. Learn Behav. 2004, 32:335-347.