There is a time and a place for everything: Bidirectional modulations of latent inhibition by time-induced context differentiation

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 806-821

  Lubow, R E ^a   De La Casa, L G ^b  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644753857     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196774     Document Type: Article

References (127)

1. AGUADO, L., DE BRUGADA, I., & HALL, G. (2001). Tests for inhibition after extinction of a conditioned stimulus in the flavour aversion procedure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 201-217.
2. AGUADO, L., SYMONDS, M., & HALL, G. (1994). Interval between preexposure and test determines the magnitude of latent inhibition: Implications for an interference account. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 188-194.
3. ÁLVAREZ, R., & LÓPEZ, M. (1995). Effects of elements or compound preexposure on conditioned taste aversion as a function of retention interval. Animal Learning & Behavior, 23, 391-399.
4. ANSCOMBE, F. (1987). The disorder of consciousness in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13, 241-260.
5. BAKNER, L., STROHEN, K., NORDEEN, M., & RICCIO, D.C. (1991). Postconditioning recovery from the latent inhibition effect in conditioned taste aversion. Physiology & Behavior, 50, 1269-1272.
6. BARUCH, I., HEMSLEY, D. R., & GRAY, J. A. (1988a). Differential performance of acute and chronic schizophrenics in a latent inhibition task. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 176, 598-606.
7. BARUCH, I., HEMSLEY, D. R., & GRAY, J. A. (1988b). Latent inhibition and "psychotic proneness" in normal subjects. Personality & Individual Differences, 9, 777-783.
8. BATSELL, W. R., JR., & BEST, M. R. (1992a). Investigation of replacement fluids and retention-interval effects in taste-aversion learning. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 414-416.
9. BATSELL, W. R., JR., & BEST, M. R. (1992b). Variations in the retention of taste aversions: Evidence for retrieval competition. Animal Learning & Behavior, 20, 146-159.
10. BATSELL, W. R., JR., & BEST, M. R. (1993). One bottle too many? Method of testing determines the detection of overshadowing and retention of taste aversions. Animal Learning & Behavior, 21, 154-158.
11. BATSELL, W. R., JR., & BEST, M. R. (1994). The role of US novelty in retention interval effects in single-element taste-aversion learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 332-340.
12. BEST, M. R. (1975). Conditioned and latent inhibition in taste aversion learning: Clarifying the role of learned safety. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 104, 97-113.
13. BEST, M. R., DOMJAN, M., & HASKINS, W. L. (1978). Long-term retention of flavor familiarization: Effects of number and amount of prior exposures. Behavioral & Neural Biology, 23, 95-99.
14. BIEDERMAN, G. B., MILGRAM, N. W., HEIGHINGTON, G. A., STOCKMAN, S. M., & O'NEILL, W. (1974). Memory of conditioned food aversion follows a U-shape function in rats. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 610-615.
15. BOUTON, M. E. (1991). Context and retrieval in extinction and in other examples of interference in simple associative learning. In L. Dachowski & C. E. Flaherty (Eds.), Current topics in animal learning: Brain, emotion, and cognition (pp. 25-53). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. BOUTON, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99.
17. BOUTON, M. E. (2002). Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: Sources of relapse after behavioral extinction. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 976-986.
18. BOUTON, M. E. (2004). Context and behavioral processes in extinction. Learning & Memory, 1, 485-494.
19. BOUTON, M. E., & BROOKS, D. C. (1993). Time and context effects on performance in a Pavlovian discrimination reversal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 165-179.
20. BOUTON, M. E., & KING, D. A. (1983). Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear: Tests for the associative value of the context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 248-265.
21. BOUTON, M. E., NELSON, J. B., & ROSAS, J. M. (1999). Stimulus generalization, context change, and forgetting. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 171-186.
22. BOUTON, M. E., & PECK, C. A. (1989). Context effects on conditioning, extinction, and reinstatement in an appetitive conditioning preparation. Animal Learning & Behavior, 17, 188-198.
23. BOUTON, M. E., & PECK, C. A. (1992). Spontaneous recovery in cross-motivational transfer (counterconditioning). Animal Learning & Behavior, 20, 313-321.
24. BROOKS, D. C., & BOUTON, M. E. (1993). A retrieval cue for extinction attenuates spontaneous recovery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 77-89.
25. CHISZAR, D. A., & SPEAR, N. E. (1969). Stimulus change, reversal learning, and retention in the rat. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 69, 190-195.
26. DE LA CASA, L. G., DIAZ, E., & LUBOW, R. E. (2003). Effects of posttreatment retention interval and context on neophobia and conditioned taste aversion. Behavioural Processes, 63, 159-170.
27. DE LA CASA, L. G., DIAZ, E., & LUBOW R. E. (2005). Delay-induced attenuation of latent inhibition with a conditioned emotional response depends on CS-US strength. Learning & Motivation, 36, 60-76.
28. DE LA CASA, L. G., & LUBOW, R. E. (1995). Latent inhibition in conditioned taste aversion: The roles of stimulus frequency and duration and the amount of fluid ingested during preexposure. Neurobiology of Learning & Memory, 64, 125-132.
29. DE LA CASA, L. G., & LUBOW, R. E. (2000). Super-latent inhibition with delayed conditioned taste aversion testing. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 389-399.
30. DE LA CASA, L. G., & LUBOW, R. E. (2002). An empirical analysis of the super-latent inhibition effect. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 112-120.
31. DE LA CASA, L. G., & LUBOW, R. E. (2005). Delay-induced super-latent inhibition as a function of order of exposure to two flavors prior to compound conditioning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58B, 1-18.
32. ESCOBAR, M., ARCEDIANO, F., & MILLER, R. R. (2002). Latent inhibition and contextual associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 123-136.
33. ESCOBAR, M., OBERLING, P., & MILLER, R. R. (2002). Associative deficit accounts of disrupted latent inhibition and blocking in schizophrenia. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 26, 203-216.
34. ESTES, W. K, (1997). Processes of memory loss, recovery, and distortion. Psychological Review, 104, 148-169.
35. FRESQUET, N., YAMAMOTO, J., & SANDNER, G. (2003). Frontal lesions do not alter the differential extinction of taste aversion conditioning in rats, using two methods of sucrose delivery. Behavioural Brain Research, 141, 25-34.
36. GIBSON, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
37. GLEITMAN, H. (1971). Forgetting of long-term memories in animals. In W. K. Honig & P. H. R. James (Eds.), Animal memory (pp. 1-44). San Diego: Academic Press.
38. GOLDSTONE, R. L., & BARSALOU, L. W. (1998). Reuniting perception and conception. Cognition, 65, 231-262.
39. GORDON, W. C., & SPEAR, N. E. (1973). Effect of reactivation of a previously acquired memory on the interaction between memories in the rat. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 349-355.
40. GRAHAME, N. J., BARNET, R. C., GUNTHER, L. M., & MILLER, R. R. (1994). Latent inhibition as a performance deficit resulting from CS-context associations. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 395-408.
41. GRAY, J. A. (1998). Integrating schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 24, 249-266.
42. GRAY, J. A., FELDON, J., RAWLINS, J. N. P., HEMSLEY, D. R., & SMITH, A. D. (1991). The neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 14, 1-84.
43. GRAY, N. S., HEMSLEY, D. R., & GRAY, J. A. (1992). Abolition of latent inhibition in acute, but not chronic, schizophrenics. Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research, 1, 83-89.
44. HALGREN, C. R. (1974). Latent inhibition in rats: Associative or nonassociative? Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 86, 74-78.
45. HALL, G. (1991). Perceptual and associative learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
46. HALL, G., & CHANNELL, S. (1985). Differential effects of contextual change on latent inhibition and on the habituation of an orienting response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 470-481.
47. HALL, G., & HONEY, R. C. (1989). Contextual effects in conditioning, latent inhibition, and habituation-associative and retrieval functions of contextual cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 232-241.
48. HALL, G., & SCHACHTMAN, T. R. (1987). Differential effects of a retention interval on latent inhibition and the habituation of an orienting response. Animal Learning & Behavior, 15, 76-82.
49. HARRIS, J. A., JONES, M. L., BAILEY, G. K., & WESTBROOK, R. F. (2000). Contextual control over conditioned responding in an extinction paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 174-185.
50. HONEY, R. C., PYE, C., LIGHTBROWN, Y., REY, V., & HALL, G. (1992). Contextual factors in neophobia and its habituation: The role of absolute and relative novelty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45B, 327-347.
51. ISHII, K., YAMADA, Y., HISHIMURA, Y., & HAGA, Y. (2002). The effects of preexposure-test and conditioning-test intervals on the magnitude of latent inhibition. Japanese Psychological Research, 44, 51-56.
52. KASPROW, W. J., CATTERSON, D., SCHACHTMAN, T. R., & MILLER, R. R. (1984). Attenuation of latent inhibition by postacquisition reminder. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36B, 53-63.
53. KAYE, H., GAMBINI, B., & MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1988). A dissociation between one-trial overshadowing and the effect of a distractor on habituation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40B, 31-47.
54. KILLCROSS, [A.] S., & BALLEINE, B. (1996). Role of primary motivation in stimulus preeexposure effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 32-42.
55. KILLCROSS, A. S., KIERNAN, M. J., DWYER, D., & WESTBROOK, R. F. (1998). Effects of retention interval on latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51B, 59-74.
56. KINTSCH, W., & MROSS, E. F. (1985). Context effects in word identification. Journal of Memory & Language, 24, 336-349.
57. KNOEDLER, A. J., HELLWIG, K. A., & NEATH, I. (1999). The shift from recency to primacy with increasing delay. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 474-487.
58. KONORSKI, J., & SZWEJKOWSKA, G. (1952). Chronic extinction and restoration of conditioned reflexes: IV The dependence of the course of extinction and restoration of conditioned reflexes on the "history" of the conditioned stimulus (The principle of the primacy of first training). Acta Biologiae Experimentalis, 16, 95-113.
59. KRAEMER, P. J., & OSSENKOPP, K.-P. (1986). The effects of flavor preexposure and test interval on conditioned taste aversions in rats. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 219-221.
60. KRAEMER, P. J., RANDALL, C. K., & CARBARY, T. J. (1991). Release from latent inhibition with delayed testing. Animal Learning & Behavior, 19, 139-145.
61. KRAEMER, P. J., & ROBERTS, W. A. (1984). The influence of flavor preexposure and test interval on conditioned taste aversion in the rat. Learning & Motivation, 15, 259-278.
62. KRAEMER, P. J., & SPEAR, N. E. (1992). The effect of nonreinforced stimulus exposure on the strength of a conditioned taste aversion as a function of retention interval: Do latent inhibition and extinction involve a shared process? Animal Learning & Behavior, 20, 1-7.
63. LOVIBOND, P. F., PRESTON, G. C., & MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1984). Context specificity of conditioning, extinction, and latent inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 360-375.
64. LUBOW, R. E. (1973). Latent inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 398-407.
65. LUBOW, R. E. (1989). Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
66. LUBOW, R. E. (1998). Latent inhibition and behavioral pathology: Some effects of stimulus preexposure. In W. O'Donohue (Ed.), Learning and behavior therapy (pp. 107-121). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
67. LUBOW, R. E. (2005). The construct validity of the animal latent inhibition model of selective attention deficits in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 31, 139-153.
68. LUBOW, R. E., & DE LA CASA, L. G. (2002). Superlatent inhibition and spontaneous recovery: Differential effects of pre- and postconditioning CS-alone presentations after long delays in different contexts. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 376-386.
69. LUBOW, R. E., & DE LA CASA, L. G. (2005). Time-induced super-latent inhibition is dependent on the distinctiveness of the retention-interval context from the other experimental contexts. Learning & Motivation, 36, 322-330.
70. LUBOW, R. E., & GEWIRTZ, J. C. (1995). Latent inhibition in humans: Data, theory, and implications for schizophrenia. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 87-103.
71. LUBOW, R. E., INGBERG-SACHS, Y., ZALSTEIN-ORDA, N., & GEWIRTZ, J. C. (1992). Disruption of latent inhibition in high psychotic-prone normal subjects. Personality & Individual Differences, 13, 563-572.
72. LUBOW, R. E., & KAPLAN, O. (2005). The visual search analogue of latent inhibition: Implications for theories of irrelevant stimulus processing in normal and schizophrenic groups. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 224-243.
73. LUBOW, R. E., MARKMAN, R. E., & ALLEN, J. (1968). Latent inhibition and classical conditioning of the rabbit pinna response. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 66, 688-694.
74. LUBOW, R. E., & MOORE, A. U. (1959). Latent inhibition: The effect of nonreinforced preexposure to the to-be-conditioned stimulus. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 52, 416-419.
75. LUBOW, R. E., RIFKIN, B., & ALEK, M. (1976). The context effect: The relationship between stimulus preexposure and environmental preexposure determines subsequent learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 38-47.
76. LUBOW, R. E., WEINER, I., & SCHNUR, P. (1981). Conditioned attention theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 1-49). New York: Academic Press.
77. MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
78. MCGEOCH, J. A. (1942). The psychology of human learning: An introduction. New York: Longmans, Green.
79. MCLAREN, I. P. L., BENNETT, C., PLAISTED, K., AITKEN, M., & MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1994). Latent inhibition, context specificity, and context familiarity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47B, 387-400.
80. MCLAREN, I. P. L., KAYE, H., & MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1989). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: Applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. In R. G. M. Morris (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology (pp. 102-130). New York: Oxford University Press.
81. MCLAREN, I. P. L., & MACKINTOSH, N. J. (2000). An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 211-246.
82. MEDIN, D. L., GOLDSTONE, R. L., & GENTNER, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100, 254-278.
83. MENSINK, G., & RAAIJMAKERS, J. G. W. (1988). A model for interference and forgetting. Psychological Review, 95, 434-455.
84. MILLER, R. R., & ESCOBAR, M. (2002). Associative interference between cues and between outcomes presented together and presented apart: An integration. Behavioural Processes, 57, 163-185.
85. MILLER, R. R., KASPROW, W. J., & SCHACHTMAN, T. R. (1986). Retrieval variability: Sources and consequences. American Journal of Psychology, 99, 145-218.
86. MILLER, R. R., & MATZEL, L. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 51-92). New York: Academic Press.
87. MIRSKY, A. F., & DUNCAN, C. C. (1986). Etiology and expression of schizophrenia: Neurobiological and psychosocial factors. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 291-319.
88. NELSON, J. B. (2002). Context specificity of excitation and inhibition in ambiguous stimuli. Learning & Motivation, 33, 284-310.
89. NUECHTERLEIN, K. H., & DAWSON, M. E. (1984). Information processing and attentional functioning in the developmental course of the schizophrenic disorder. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 10, 160-203.
90. OBERLING, P., GOSSELIN, O., & MILLER, R. R. (1998). Latent inhibition in animals as a model of acute schizophrenia: A re-analysis. In M. Haug & R. E. Whalen (Eds.), Animal models of human emotion and cognition (pp. 87-102). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
91. OTTO, T., COUSENS, G., & RAJEWSKI, K. (1997). Odor-guided fear conditioning in rats: 1. Acquisition, retention, and latent inhibition. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111, 1257-1264.
92. PAYNE, D. G. (1987). Hypermnesia and reminiscence in recall: A historical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 5-27.
93. PEARCE, J. M., & HALL, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 332-352.
94. PECK, C. A., & BOUTON, M. E. (1990). Context and performance in aversive-to-appetitive and appetitive-to-aversive transfer. Learning & Motivation 21, 1-31.
95. POSTMAN, L., STARK, K., & FRASER, J. (1968). Temporal changes in interference. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 7, 672-694.
96. REED, P., CROFT, H., & YEOMANS, M. (1996). Rats' memory for serially presented novel flavours: Evidence for non-spatial primacy effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 174-187.
97. REISS, S., & WAGNER, A. R. (1972). CS habituation produces a "latent inhibition effect" but no active "conditioned inhibition." Learning & Motivation, 3, 237-245.
98. RESCORLA, R. A. (1971). Summation and retardation tests of latent inhibition. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 75, 77-81.
99. RESCORLA, R. A. (1997). Spontaneous recovery after Pavlovian conditioning with multiple outcomes. Animal Learning & Behavior, 25, 99-107.
100. RESCORLA, R. A. (2002). Savings tests: Separating differences in rate of learning from differences in initial levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 369-377.
101. RICCIO, D. C., ACKIL, J., & BURCH-VERNON, A. (1992). Forgetting of stimulus attributes: Methodological implications for assessing associative phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 433-445.
102. RICCIO, D. C., RABINOWITZ, V. C., & AXELROD, S. (1994). Memory: When less is more. American Psychology, 49, 917-926.
103. RICCIO, D. C., RICHARDSON, R., & EBNER, D. L. (1984). Memory retrieval deficits based upon altered contextual cues: A paradox. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 152-165.
104. ROSAS, J. M., & BOUTON, M. E. (1996). Spontaneous recovery after extinction of a conditioned taste aversion. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 341-348.
105. ROSAS, J. M., & BOUTON, M. E. (1997). Additivity of the effects of retention interval and context change on latent inhibition: Toward resolution of the context forgetting paradox. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 283-294.
106. ROSAS, J. M., & BOUTON, M. E. (1998). Context change and retention interval can have additive, rather than interactive, effects after taste aversion extinction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 79-83.
107. ROSAS, J. M., VILA, J., LUGO, M., & LOPEZ, L. (2001). Combined effect of context change and retention interval on interference in causality judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 153-164.
108. RUBIN, D. C., & WENZEL, A. E. (1996). One hundred years of forgetting: A quantitative description of retention. Psychological Review, 103, 734-760.
109. SAKSIDA, L. M. (1999). Effects of similarity and experience on discrimi nation learning: A nonassociative connectionist model of perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 308-323.
110. SIEGEL, S. (1974). Flavor preexposure and "learned safety." Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 87, 1073-1082.
111. SMITH, S. M., GLENBERG, A., & BJORK, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory. Memory & Cognition, 6, 342-353.
112. SPEAR, N. E. (1973). Retrieval of memory in animals. Psychological Review, 80, 163-194.
113. SPEAR, N. E. (1978). The processing of memories: Forgetting and retention. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
114. SPEAR, N. E., SMITH, G. H., BRYAN, R. G., GORDON, W. C., TIMMONS, R., & CHISZAR, D. A. (1980). Contextual influences on the interaction between conflicting memories in the rat. Animal Learning & Behavior, 8, 273-281.
115. STEINERT, P. A., INFURNA, R. N., & SPEAR, N. E. (1980). Long-term retention of a conditioned taste aversion in preweanling and adult rats. Animal Learning & Behavior, 8, 375-381.
116. STOUT, S. C., AMUNDSON, J. C., & MILLER, R. R. (in press). Trial order and retention interval in human predictive judgment. Memory & Cognition.
117. TVERSKY, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
118. UNDERWOOD, B. J. (1948a). Retroactive and proactive inhibition after five and forty-eight hours. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 29-38.
119. UNDERWOOD, B. J. (1948b). "Spontaneous recovery" of verbal associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 429-439.
120. URUSHIHARA, K., WHEELER, D. S., & MILLER, R. R. (2004). Outcome pre- and postexposure effects: Retention interval interacts with primacy and recency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 30, 283-298.
121. VILA, J., ROMERO, M., & ROSAS, J. M. (2002). Retroactive interference after discrimination reversal decreases following temporal and physical context changes in human subjects. Behavioural Processes, 59, 47-54.
122. WAGNER, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
123. WEINER, I. (2003). The "two-headed" latent inhibition model of schizophrenia: Modeling positive and negative symptoms and their treatment. Psychopharmacology, 169, 257-297.
124. WESTBROOK, R. F., JONES, M. L., BAILEY, G. K., & HARRIS, J. A. (2000). Contextual control over conditioned responding in a latent inhibition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 157-173.
125. WHEELER, D. S., STOUT, S. C., & MILLER, R. R. (2004). Interaction of retention interval with CS-preexposure and extinction treatments: Symmetry with respect to primacy. Learning & Behavior, 32, 335-347.
126. WICKENS, C., TUBER, D. S., & WICKENS, D. D. (1983). Memory for the conditioned response: The proactive effect of preexposure to potential conditioning stimuli and context change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 41-57.
127. WRIGHT, A. A., SANTIAGO, H. C., SANDS, S. F., KENDRICK, D. F., & COOK, R. G. (1985). Memory processing of serial lists by pigeons, monkeys, and people. Science, 229, 287-289.