Latent inhibition: a neural network approach

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 321-349

  Nestor, A ^a,b,c   Lam, Ying Wan ^a,b,c   Gray, J A ^a,b,c  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; ATTENTION; BRAIN; CONDITIONED REFLEX; HUMAN; LEARNING; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; BRAIN; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; HUMANS; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER);

EID: 0030188219     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.22.3.321     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Ayres, J.J. B., Albert, M., & Bombace, J. C. (1987). Extending conditioned stimuli before versus after unconditioned stimuli: Implication for real-time models of conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 13, 168-181.
2. Ayres, J.J.B., Moore, J. W., & Vigorito, M. (1984). Hall and Pearce negative transfer: Assessment in conditioned suppression and nictitating membrane conditioning experiments. Animal Learning and Behavior, 12, 428-438.
3. Ayres, J. J. B., Philbin, D., Cassidy, S., & Belling, L. (1992). Some parameters of latent inhibition. Learning and Motivation, 23, 269-287.
4. Baker, A. G. (1974). Conditioned inhibition is not the symmetrical opposite of conditioned excitation: A test of the RescorlaWagner model. Learning and Motivation, 5, 396-379.
5. Baker, A. G., Haskins, C. E., & Hall, G. (1990). Stimulus generalization decrement in latent inhibition to a compound following exposure to the elements of the compound. Animal Learning and Behavior, 18, 162-170.
6. Baker, A. G., & Mercier, P. (1982). Extinction of the context and latent inhibition. Learning and Motivation, 13, 391-416.
7. Balaz, M. A., Capra, S., Kasprow, W. J., & Miller, R. R. (1982). Latent inhibition of the conditioning context: Further evidence of contextual potentiation of retrieval in the absence of appre-ciable context-US relations. Animal Learning and Behavior, 10, 242-248.
8. Balaz, M.A., Gutsin, P., Cacheiro, H., & Miller, R. R. (1982). Blocking as a retrieval failure: Reactivation of associations to a blocked stimulus. Quarterly Review of Experimental Psychology, 34B, 99-113.
9. Best, M. R., Gemberling, G. A., & Johnson, P. E. (1979). Disrupting the conditioned stimulus preexposure effect in flavor aversion learning: Effects of interoceptive distractor manipulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 321-334.
10. Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99.
11. Brogden, W. J. (1939). Sensory pre-conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 223-232.
12. Channel, S., & Hall, G. (1981). Facilitation and retardation of discrimination learning after preexposure to the stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 437-446.
13. Chantrey, D. (1974). Stimulus preexposure and discrimination learning by domestic chicks: Effects of varying interstimulus time. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 87, 517-525.
14. Crowell, C. R., & Anderson, D. C. (1972). Variations in intensity, interstimulus interval, and interval between preconditioning CS exposures and conditioning with rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 79, 291-298.
15. DeVietti, T. L., & Barrett, O. V. (1986). Latent inhibition: No effect of intertriai interval of the preexposure trials. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 453-455.
16. Dickinson, A., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1979). Reinforcer specificity in the enhancement of conditioning by posttrial surprise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 162-177.
17. Diez-Chamizo, V., Sterio, D., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1985). Blocking and overshadowing between intra-maze and extra-maze cues: A test of the independence of locale and guidance learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37B, 235-253.
18. Fanselow, M. S. (1990). Factors governing one-trial contextual conditioning. Animal Learning and Behavior, 18, 264-270.
19. Frey, P. W., & Ross, L.E. (1968). Classical conditioning of the rabbit eyelid response as a function of interstimulus interval. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 65, 246-250.
20. Frey, P. W., & Sears, R. J. (1978). Model of conditioning incorporating the Rescorla-Wagner associative axiom, a dynamic attention process, and a catastrophe rule. Psychological Review, 85, 321-340.
21. Gluck, M. A., & Myers, C. E. (1993). Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: A computational theory. Hippocampus, 3, 491-516.
22. Good, M., & Honey, R. (1993). Selective hippocampus lesions abolish contextual specificity of latent inhibition and conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 23-33.
23. Gordon, W. C., & Weaver, M. S. (1989). Cue-induced transfer of CS preexposure effects across contexts. Animal Learning and Behavior, 17, 409-417.
24. Gormezano, L, & Moore, J. W. (1969). Classical conditioning. In M. H. Marx (Ed.), Learning processes (pp. 119-203). New York: Macmillan.
25. Grahame, N. J., Barnet, R. C., Günther, L. M., & Miller, R. R. (1994). Latent inhibition as a performance deficit resulting from CS-context associations. Animal Learning and Behavior, 22, 395-408.
26. Gray, J. A. (1971). The psychology of fear and stress. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
27. Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An inquiry into the function of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
28. Grossberg, S. (1975). A neural model of attention, reinforcement, and discrimination learning. International Review ofNeurobiology, 18, 263-327.
29. Hall, G. (1991). Perceptual and associative learning. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
30. Hall, G., & Channel!, S. (1985a). Differential effects of contextual change on latent inhibition and on the habituation of an orienting response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 470-481.
31. Hall, G., & Channel!, S. (1985b). Latent inhibition and conditioning after preexposure to the training context. Learning and Motivation, 16, 381-481.
32. Hall, G., & Minor, H. (1984). A search for context-stimulus associations in latent inhibition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36B, 145-169.
33. Hall, G., & Pearce, J. M. (1979). Latent inhibition of a CS during CS-US pairings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 31-42.
34. Hall, G., & Pearce, J. M. (1982). Restoring the associability of a preexposed CS by a surprising event. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34B, 127-140.
35. Hall, G., & Schachtman, T. R. (1987). Differential effects of a retention interval on latent inhibition and the habituation of an orienting response. Animal Learning and Behavior, 15, 76-82.
36. Hinzman, D. L. (1991). Why are formal models useful in psychology? In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandosky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdoch. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Holland, P. C., & Forbes, D. R. (1980). Effects of compound or element preexposure on compound flavor aversion conditioning. Animal Learning and Behavior, 8, 199-203.
38. Honey, R. C., & Hall, G. (1988). Overshadowing and blocking procedures in latent inhibition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 163-186.
39. Honey, R. C., & Hall, G. (1989). Attenuation of latent inhibition after compound preexposure: Associative and perceptual explanations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41B, 355-368.
40. Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
41. Kamin, L. J. (1968). Attention-like processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami Symposium on the Prediction of Behavior: Aversive Stimulation (pp. 9-33). Miami, FL: University of Miami Press.
42. Kasprovv, W. J., Cacheiro, H., Balaz, M. A., & Miller, R. R. (1982). Reminder-induced recovery of associations to an overshadowed stimulus. Learning and Motivation, 13, 308-318.
43. Kasprow, W. J., Catterson, D., Schachtman, T. R., & Miller, R. R. (1984). Attenuation of latent inhibition by post-acquisition reminder. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36B, 53-63.
44. Kaye, H., & Pearce, J. M. (1984). The strength of the orienting response during Pavlovian conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 90-109.
45. Klein, S. B., Mikulka, P. J., & Hamel, K. (1976). Influence of sucrose preexposure on acquisition of a conditioned response. Behavioral Biology, 16, 99-104.
46. Kohonen, T. (1977). Associative memory. New York: Springer.
47. Kraemer, P. J., Randall, C. K., & Carbary, T. J. (1991). Release from latent inhibition with delayed testing. Animal Learning and Behavior, 19, 139-145.
48. Lantz, A. E. (1973). Effect of number of trials, interstimulus interval, and dishabituation on subsequent conditioning in a CER paradigm. Animal Learning and Behavior, 1, 273-277.
49. Lovibond, P. F., Preston, G. C., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1984). Context specificity of conditioning, extinction, and latent inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 360-375.
50. Lubow, R. E. (1989). Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
51. Lubow, R. E., & Gewirtz, J. C. (1995). Latent inhibition in humans: Data, theory, and implications for schizophrenia. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 87-103.
52. Lubow, R. E., & Moore, A. U. (1959). Latent inhibition: The effect of non-reinforced preexposure to the conditional stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 52, 415-419.
53. Lubow, R. E., Rifkin, B., & Alek, M. (1976). The context effect: The relationship between stimulus preexposure and environmental preexposure determines subsequent learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 38-47.
54. Lubow, R. E., Schnur, P., & Rifkin, B. (1976). Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 163-174.
55. Lubow, R. E., Weiner, L, & Schnur, P. (1981). Conditioned attention theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. (Vol. 15, pp. 1-49). New York: Academic Press.
56. Mackintosh, N. J. (1973). Stimulus selection: Learning to ignore stimuli that predict no change in reinforcement. In R. A. Hinde & J. S. Hinde (Eds.), Constraints of learning (pp. 75-96). London: Academic Press.
57. Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
58. McLaren, I. P. L., Bennett, C., Plaisted, K., Aitken, M., & Mackintosh, N.J. (1994). Latent inhibition, context specificity, and context familiarity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47B, 387-400.
59. McLaren, I. P. L, Kaye, H., & Mackintosh, N.J. (1989). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: Applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. In R. G. M. Morris (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
60. Miller, R. R., & Schachtman, T. R. (1985). Conditioning context as an associative baseline: Implications for response generation and the nature of conditioned inhibition. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 51-88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Moore, J. W., & Stickney, K. J. (1980). Formation of attentionalassociative networks in real time: Role of the hippocampus and implications for conditioning. Physiological Psychology, 8, 207-217.
62. Myers, C. E., & Gluck, M. A. (1994). Context, conditioning, and hippocampal representation in animal learning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 835-847.
63. North, A. J., & Stimmel, D. T. (1960). Extinction of an instrumental response following a large number of reinforcements. Psychological Reports, 6, 227-234.
64. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
65. Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532-552.
66. Pearce, J. M., Kaye, H., & Hall, G. (1983). Predictive accuracy and stimulus associability: Development of a model of Pavlovian learning. In M. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 241-255). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
67. Penick, S., & Solomon, P. R. (1991). Hippocampus, context, and conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 105, 611-617.
68. Reed, P. (1995). Compound stimulus preexposure effects in an appetitive conditioning procedure. Learning and Motivation, 26, 1-10.
69. Reiss, S., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). CS habituation produces a latent inhibition effect but no active conditioned inhibition. Learning and Motivation, 3, 237-245.
70. Rescorla, R. A. (1971). Summation and retardation tests of latent inhibition. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 75, 77-81.
71. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variation in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning H: Theory and research (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
72. Revusky, S. (1971). The role of interference in association over delay. In W. K. Honig & P. H. R. James (Eds.), Animal memory (pp. 155-213). New York: Academic Press.
73. Rudy, J. W., Krauter, E. E., & Gaffuri, A. (1976). Attenuation of latent inhibition by prior preexposure to another stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 235-247.
74. Rudy, J. W., Rosenberg, L., & Sandell, J. H. (1977). Disruption of taste familiarity effect by novel exteroceptive stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 26-32.
75. Schmajuk, N. A., & Axelrad, E. (1995). Communication and consciousness: A neural network conjecture. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 18, 695-696.
76. Schmajuk, N. A., & DiCarlo, J. J. (1991). A neural network approach to hippocampal function in classical conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 105, 82-110.
77. Schmajuk, N. A., & DiCarlo, J. J. (1992). Stimulus configuration, classical conditioning, and the hippocampus. Psychological Review, 99, 268-305.
78. Schmajuk, N. A., & Gray, J. A. (1993, November 5-7). Latent inhibition: A neural net\vork approach. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Meeting of The Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC.
79. Schmajuk, N. A., & Moore, J. W. (1988). The hippocampus and the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response: A real-time attentional-associative model. Psychobiology, 46, 20-35.
80. Schmajuk, N. A., & Moore, J. W. (1989). Effects of hippocampal manipulations on the classically conditioned nictitating mem-brane response: Simulations by an attentional-associative model. Behavioral Brain Research, 32, 173-189.
81. Schnur, P., & Lubow, R. E. (1976). Latent inhibition: The effects of ITI and CS intensity during preexposure. Learning and Motivation, 7, 540-550.
82. Siegel, S. (1969). Generalization of latent inhibition. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 69, 157-159.
83. Smith, M., & Gormezano, I. (1965). Effects of alternating classical conditioning and extinction sessions on the conditioned nictitating membrane response of the rabbit. Psychonomic Science, 3, 91-92.
84. Sokolov, E. N. (1960). Neuronal models and the orienting reflex. In M. A. B. Brazier (Ed.), The central nervous system and behavior (pp. 187-276). New York: Macy Foundation.
85. Solomon, P. R., Brennan, G., & Moore, J. W. (1974). Latent inhibition of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response as a function of CS intensity. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 445-448.
86. Spear, N. E. (1981). Extending the domain of memory retrieval. In R. R., Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 341-378). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
87. Spear, N. E., Miller, J. S., & Jagielo, J. A. (1990). Animal memory and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 169-211.
88. Testa, T. J., & Ternes, J. W. (1977). Specificity of conditioning mechanisms in the modification of food preferences. In L. M. Barker, M. R. Best, & M. Domjan (Eds.), Learning mechanisms in food selection (pp. 229-253). Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
89. Trobalon, J. B., Chamizo, V. D., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1992). Role of context in perceptual learning in maze discriminations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44B, 57-73.
90. Wagner, A. R. (1978). Expectancies and the priming of STM. In S. H. Hülse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.), Cognitive processes in animal behavior (pp. 177-209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
91. Wagner, A. R. (1979). Habituation and memory. In A. Dickinson & R. A. Boakes (Eds.), Mechanisms of learning and motivation (pp. 53-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
92. Wagner, A. R., Logan, F. A., Haberlandt, K., & Price, T. (1968). Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 171-180.
93. Westbrook, R. F., Bond, N. W., & Feyer, A-M. (1981). Short- and long-term decrements in toxicosis-induced odor-aversion learning: The role of duration of exposure to an odor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 362-381.
94. Wickens, C., Tuber, D. S., & Wickens, D. D. (1983). Memory for the conditioned response: The proactive effect of preexposure to potential conditioning stimuli and context change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 41-57.
95. Zimmer-Hart, C. L., & Rescorla, R. A. (1974). Extinction of Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 86, 837-845.