Super-latent inhibition of conditioned taste preference with a long retention interval

Learning and Motivation

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 329-342

  Casa, L G De la ^a   Marquez, R ^a   Lubow, R E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Conditioned taste preference; Context differentiation hypothesis; Retention interval; Super latent inhibition

Indexed keywords

EID: 67349221051     PISSN: 00239690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lmot.2009.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aguado L., Symonds M., and Hall G. Interval between preexposure and test determines the magnitude of latent inhibition: Implications for an interference account. Animal Learning & Behavior 22 (1994) 188-194
2. Bouton M.E. Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin 114 (1993) 80-99
3. Capaldi E.D. Hunger and the learning of flavor preferences. In: Bolles R.C. (Ed). The hedonics of taste (1991), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 127-142
4. Capaldi E.D., Myers D.E., Campbell D.H., and Sheffer J.D. Conditioned flavor preferences based on hunger level during original flavor exposure. Animal Learning & Behavior 11 (1983) 107-115
5. De la Casa L.G., and Lubow R.E. Super-latent inhibition with conditioned taste aversion testing. Animal Learning & Behavior 28 (2000) 389-399
6. De la Casa L.G., and Lubow R.E. An empirical analysis of the super-latent inhibition effect. Animal Learning & Behavior 30 (2002) 112-120
7. De la Casa L.G., and Lubow R.E. Delay-induced super-latent inhibition as a function of order of exposure to two flavors prior to compound conditioning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 58B (2005) 1-18
8. Escobar M., Arcediano F., and Miller R.R. Latent inhibition and contextual associations. Journal Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 28 (2002) 123-136
9. Fedorchak P.M., and Bolles R.C. Hunger enhances the expression of calorie but not taste-mediated conditioned flavor preferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 13 (1987) 73-79
10. Holman E.W. Immediate and delayed reinforcers for flavor preferences in rats. Animal Learning & Behavior 6 (1975) 91-100
11. Lubow R.E. Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory (1989), Cambridge University Press, New York
12. Lubow R.E. Latent inhibition and behavioral pathology: Some effects of stimulus preexposure. In: O'Donohue W. (Ed). Learning and behavior therapy (1998), Allyn and Bacon, Boston 107-121
13. Lubow R.E. Conditioned taste aversion and latent inhibition: A review. In: Reilly S., and Schachtman T. (Eds). Conditioned taste aversion: Behavioral and neural processes (2009), Oxford University Press, Oxford 37-57
14. Lubow, R. E., & Weiner, I. (Eds.). (in press). Latent inhibition: Data, theories, and applications to schizophrenia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Lubow R.E., and De la Casa G. Super-latent inhibition and spontaneous recovery: Differential effects of pre- and post-conditioning CS-alone presentations after long delays in different contexts. Animal Learning & Behavior 30 (2002) 376-386
16. Lubow R.E., and De la Casa L.G. There is a time and a place for everything: Bi-directional modulations of latent inhibition by time-induced context differentiation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12 (2005) 806-821
17. Lubow R.E., and De la Casa G. Time-induced super-latent inhibition is dependent on the distinctiveness of the retention-interval context from the other experimental contexts. Learning and Motivation 36 (2005) 322-330
18. Mackintosh N.J. A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review 82 (1975) 276-298
19. Mehiel R. Hedonic-shift conditioning with calories. In: Bolles R.C. (Ed). The hedonics of taste (1991), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 107-126
20. Miller R.R., Kasprow W.J., and Schachtman T.R. Retrieval variability: Sources and consequences. American Journal of Psychology 99 (1986) 145-218
21. Pearce J.M., and Hall G. A model for Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review 87 (1980) 332-352
22. Riccio D.C., Richardson R., and Ebner D.L. Memory retrieval deficits based upon altered contextual cues: A paradox. Psychological Bulletin 96 (1984) 152-165
23. Schmajuk N.A., and Larrauri J.A. Experimental challenges to theories of classical conditioning: Application of a computational model of storage and retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 32 (2006) 1-20
24. Stout S., Amundson J.C., and Miller R.R. Trial order and retention interval in human contingency judgment. Memory & Cognition 33 (2005) 1368-1376
25. Wheeler D.S., Stout S.C., and Miller R.R. Interaction of retention interval with CS-prexposure and extinction treatments: Symmetry with respect to primacy. Learning & Behavior 32 (2004) 335-347