Contextual control over conditioned responding in a latent inhibition paradigm

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 157-173

  Westbrook, R Frederick ^a   Jones, Megan L ^a   Bailey, Glynis K ^a   Harris, Justin A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; RAT; WISTAR RAT;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RATS; RATS, WISTAR;

EID: 0034170729     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.26.2.157     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aguado, L., Symonds, M., & Hall, G. (1994). Interval between preexposure and test determines the magnitude of latent inhibition: Implications for an interference account. Animal Learning and Behavior, 22, 188-194.
2. Bouton, M. E. (1991). Context and retrieval in extinction and in other examples of interference in simple associative learning. In L. Dachowski & C. F. Flaherty (Eds.), Current topics in animal learning: Brain, emotion, and cognition (pp. 25-53). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99.
4. Bouton, M. E., & Brooks, D. (1993). Time and context effects on performance in a Pavlovian discrimination reversal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 165-179.
5. Bouton, M. E., Nelson, J. B., & Rosas, J. M. (1999a). Resolution now! Reply to Riccio, Richardson, and Ebner (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 190-192.
6. Bouton, M. E., Nelson, J. B., & Rosas, J. M. (1999b). Stimulus generalization, context change, and forgetting. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 171-186.
7. Bouton, M. E., & Swartzentruber, D. (1989). Slow reacquisition following extinction: Context, encoding, and retrieval mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 43-53.
8. Channell, S., & Hall, G. (1983). Contextual effects in latent inhibition with an appetitive conditioning procedure. Animal Learning & Behavior, 11, 67-74.
9. Fanselow, M. S. (1980). Extinction of contextual fear and preference for signaled shock. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 16, 458-460.
10. Hall, G., & Channell, S. (1985). Differential effects of contextual change on latent inhibition and on the habituation of an orienting response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 470-481.
11. Hall, G., & Minor, H. (1984). A search for context-stimulus associations in latent inhibition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 36B, 145-169.
12. Harris, J. A., Jones, M. L., Bailey, G. K., & Westbrook, R. F. (2000). Contextual control over conditioned responding in an extinction paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 175-186.
13. Harris, R. J. (1994). ANOVA: An analysis of variance primer. Itasc, IL: F. E. Peacock Publishers.
14. Hays, W. L. (1981). Statistics for psychologists. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
15. Holland, P. C. (1983). Occasion-setting in Pavlovian feature positive discrimination. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Discrimination processes (Vol 4., pp. 183-206). New York: Ballinger.
16. Honey, R. C., & Hall, G. (1989). Attenuation of latent inhibition after compound preexposure: Associative and perceptual explanations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41B, 355-368.
17. Kaye, H., Preston, G. C., Szabo, L., Druiff, H., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1987). Context specificity of conditioning and latent inhibition: Evidence for a dissociation of latent inhibition and associative interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 39, 127-145.
18. Killcross, A. S., & Balleine, B. (1996). Role of primary motivation in stimulus preexposure effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 32-42.
19. Killcross, A. S., Kiernan, M. J., Dwyer, D., & Westbrook, R. F. (1998). Effects of retention interval on latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 51B, 59-74.
20. Kraemer, P. J., Hoffmann, H., & Spear, N. E. (1988). Attenuation of the CS-preexposure effect after a retention interval in preweanling rats. Animal Learning & Behavior, 16, 185-190.
21. Kraemer, P. J., & Roberts, W. (1984). The influence of flavor preexposure and test interval on conditioned taste aversions in the rat. Learning and Motivation, 15, 259-278.
22. Kraemer, P. J., & Spear, N. E. (1992). The effect of nonreinforced stimulus exposure on the strength of a conditioned taste aversion as a function of retention interval: Do latent inhibition and extinction involve a shared process? Animal Learning & Behavior, 20, 1-7.
23. Lovibond, P. F., Preston, G. C., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1984). Context specificity of conditioning, extinction and latent inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 360-375.
24. Lubow, R. E. (1965). Latent inhibition: Effects of nonreinforced preexposure of the CS. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 60, 454-457.
25. Lubow, R. E. (1973). Latent inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 398-407.
26. Lubow, R. E. (1989). Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Lubow, R. E., & Moore, A. U. (1959). Latent inhibition: The effect of nonreinforced preexposure to the conditioned stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology; 52, 415-419.
28. Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
29. McLaren, I. P. L., Kaye, H., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1989). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: Applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. In R. G. M. Morris (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology (pp. 102-130). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
30. O'Brien, R. G., & Kaiser, M. K. (1985). MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: An extensive primer. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 316-333.
31. Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 82, 532-552.
32. Pfautz, P., Donegan, N., & Wagner, A. R. (1978). Sensory preconditioning versus protection from habituation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4, 286-295.
33. Reiss, S, & Wagner, A. R. (1972). CS habituation produces a "latent inhibition effect" but no active "conditioned inhibition." Learning and Motivation, 3, 237-245.
34. Rescorla, R. A. (1971). Summation and retardation tests of latent inhibition. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 75, 77-81.
35. Rescorla, R. A. (1985). Facilitation and inhibition. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 299-326). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Rescorla, R. A., & Durlach, P. J. (1981). Within-event learning in Pavlovian conditioning. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 81-111). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Rescorla, R. A., Durlach, P. J., & Grau, J. W. (1985). Contextual learning in Pavlovian conditioning. In P. D. Balsam & A. Tomie (Eds.), Context and learning (pp. 23-56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Riccio, D. C., Richardson, R., & Ebner, D. L. (1984). Memory retrieval deficits based upon altered contextual cues: A paradox. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 152-165.
39. Riccio, D. C., Richardson, R., & Ebner, D. L. (1999). The contextual change paradox is still unresolved: Comment on Bouton, Nelson, and Rosas (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 187-189.
40. Rizley, R. C., & Rescorla, R. A. (1972). Associations in second-order conditioning and sensory preconditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 81, 1-11.
41. Rosas, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (1997). Additivity of the effects of retention interval and context change on latent inhibition: Toward resolution of the context forgetting paradox. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 283-294.
42. Schmajuk, N. A., Lam, Y. W., & Gray, J. A. (1996). Latent inhibition: A neural network approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 321-349.
43. Siegel, S. (1969). Effect of CS habituation on eyelid conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 68, 245-248.
44. Swartzentruber, D., & Bouton, M. E. (1992). Context sensitivity of conditioned suppression following preexposure to the conditioned stimulus. Animal Learning & Behavior, 20, 97-103.
45. Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.