The use of OWA operator weights for cross-efficiency aggregation

Omega

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 493-503

  Wang, Ying Ming ^a   Chin, Kwai Sang ^b  

^a FUZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Cross efficiency evaluation; Data envelopment analysis; Efficiency aggregation; OWA operators

Indexed keywords

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; MATRIX ALGEBRA;

CROSS-EFFICIENCY; CROSS-EFFICIENCY EVALUATION; DECISION MAKING UNIT; EFFICIENCY AGGREGATION; EFFICIENCY MATRIX; MEASUREMENTS OF; OPERATOR WEIGHTS; ORDERED WEIGHTED AVERAGING OPERATOR; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS; RANKING DECISIONS;

EFFICIENCY;

EID: 79551684205     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2010.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Sexton T.R., Silkman R.H., Hogan A.J. Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. Measuring efficiency: an assessment of data envelopment analysis 1986, 1986. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. R.H. Silkman (Ed.).
2. Oral M., Kettani O., Lang P. A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects. Management Science 1991, 37:871-885.
3. Wu J., Liang L., Yang F., Yan H. Bargaining game model in the evaluation of decision making units. Expert Systems with Applications 2008, 36:4357-4362.
4. Shang J., Sueyoshi T. A unified framework for the selection of flexible manufacturing system. European Journal of Operational Research 1995, 85:297-315.
5. Baker P.C., Talluri S. A closer look at the use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection. Computers and Industrial Engineering 1997, 32:101-108.
6. Sun S. Assessing computer numerical control machines using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Research 2002, 40:2011-2039.
7. Green R.H., Doyle J.R., Cook W.D. Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research 1996, 90:461-472.
8. Wu J., Liang L., Zha Y.C. Preference voting and ranking using DEA game cross efficiency model. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan 2009, 52:105-111.
9. Talluri S., Sarkis J. Extensions in efficiency measurement of alternate machine component grouping solutions via data envelopment analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 1997, 44:299-304.
10. Chen T.Y. An assessment of technical efficiency and cross-efficiency in Taiwan's electricity distribution sector. European Journal of Operational Research 2002, 137:421-433.
11. Ertay T., Ruan D. Data envelopment analysis based decision model for optimal operator allocation in CMS. European Journal of Operational Research 2005, 164:800-810.
12. Lu W.M., Lo S.F. A closer look at the economic-environmental disparities for regional development in China. European Journal of Operational Research 2007, 183:882-894.
13. Lu W.M., Lo S.F. A benchmark-learning roadmap for regional sustainable development in China. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2007, 58:841-849.
14. Wu J., Liang L., Wu D., Yang F. Olympics ranking and benchmarking based on cross efficiency evaluation method and cluster analysis: the case of Sydney 2000. International Journal of Enterprise Network Management 2008, 2:377-392.
15. Wu J., Liang L., Yang F. Achievement and benchmarking of countries at the Summer Olympics using cross efficiency evaluation method. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 197:722-730.
16. Wu J., Liang L., Chen Y. DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings. Omega 2009, 37:909-918.
17. Yu M.M., Ting S.C., Chen M.C. Evaluating the cross-efficiency of information sharing in supply chains. Expert Systems with Applications 2010, 37:2891-2897.
18. Doyle J., Green R. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses. Journal of the Operations Research Society 1994, 45:567-578.
19. Doyle J.R., Green R.H. Cross-evaluation in DEA: improving discrimination among DMUs. INFOR 1995, 33:205-222.
20. Liang L., Wu J., Cook W.D., Zhu J. The DEA game cross-efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium. Operations Research 2008, 56:1278-1288.
21. Anderson T.R., Hollingsworth K., Inman L. The fixed weighting nature of a cross-evaluation model. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2002, 17:249-255.
22. Sun S., Lu W.M. A cross-efficiency profiling for increasing discrimination in data envelopment analysis. INFOR 2005, 43:51-60.
23. Bao C.P., Chen T.H., Chang S.Y. Slack-based ranking method: an interpretation to the cross-efficiency method in DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2008, 59:860-862.
24. Liang L., Wu J., Cook W.D., Zhu J. Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross efficiency evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics 2008, 113:1025-1030.
25. Wang Y.M., Chin K.S. Some alternative models for DEA cross-efficiency evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics 2010, 128(1):332-338.
26. Wang Y.M., Chin K.S. A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension. Expert Systems with Applications 2010, 37:3666-3675.
27. Wu D. Performance evaluation: an integrated method using data envelopment analysis and fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 194:227-235.
28. Wu J., Liang L., Zha Y., Yang F. Determination of cross-efficiency under the principle of rank priority in cross-evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications 2008, 36:4826-4829.
29. Ramón N., Ruiz J.L., Sirvent I. On the choice of weights profiles in cross-efficiency evaluations. European Journal of Operational Research 2010, 207(3):1564-1572.
30. Wu J., Liang L., Yang F. Determination of the weights for the ultimate cross efficiency using Shapley value in cooperative game. Expert Systems with Applications 2009, 36:872-876.
31. Wu J., Liang L., Zha Y.C. Determination of the weights of ultimate cross efficiency based on the solution of nucleolus in cooperative game. Systems Engineering-Theory and Practice 2008, 28:92-97.
32. Yager R.R. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics 1988, 18:183-190.
33. O'Hagan M. Aggregating template or rule antecedents in real-time expert systems with fuzzy set logic. In: Proceedings of the 22nd annual IEEE Asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers, Pacific Grove, California, 1988. p. 681-9.
34. Wang Y.M., Parkan C. A minimax disparity approach for obtaining OWA operator weights. Information Sciences 2005, 175:20-29.
35. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 1978, 2:429-444.
36. Khouja M. The use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection. Computers and Industrial Engineering 1995, 28:123-132.
37. Imany M.M., Schlesinger R.J. Decision models for robot selection: a comparison of ordinary least squares and linear goal programming methods. Decision Science 1989, 20:40-53.
38. Cook W.D., Liang L., Zhu J. Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: a review and future perspective. Omega 2010, 38(6):423-430.
39. Paradi J.C., Rouatt S., Zhu H. Two-stage evaluation of bank branch efficiency using data envelopment analysis. Omega 2011, 39(1):99-109.
40. Kao C. Malmquist productivity index based on common-weights DEA: the case of Taiwan forests after reorganization. Omega 2010, 38(6):484-491.
41. Chang H., Choy H.L., Cooper W.W., Ruefli T.W. Using Malmquist Indexes to measure changes in the productivity and efficiency of US accounting firms before and after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Omega 2009, 37(5):951-960.
42. Fiordelisi F., Molyneux P. Total factor productivity and shareholder returns in banking. Omega 2010, 38(5):241-253.
43. Asmild M., Paradi J.C., Pastor J.T. Centralized resource allocation BCC models. Omega 2009, 37(1):40-49.
44. Du J., Liang L., Chen Y., Bi G.B. DEA-based production planning. Omega 2010, 38(1-2):105-112.