Bargaining game model in the evaluation of decision making units

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 36, Issue 3 PART 1, 2009, Pages 4357-4362

  Wu, Jie ^a   Liang, Liang ^a   Yang, Feng ^a   Yan, Hong ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Cross efficiency; DEA; Nash bargaining game; R D projects

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION THEORY; EFFICIENCY; GAME THEORY; MOTIVATION;

CORRESPONDING WEIGHTS; CROSS EFFICIENCY; CROSS-EFFICIENCY EVALUATION; DECISION MAKING UNIT; MULTIPLE INPUTS AND OUTPUTS; NASH BARGAINING GAME; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND BENCHMARKING; RELATIVE EFFICIENCY;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 58349097717     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Anderson T.R., Hollingsworth K.B., and Inman L.B. The fixed weighting nature of a cross-evaluation model. Journal of Productivity Analysis 18 (2002) 249-255
2. In: Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Lewin A.Y., and Seiford L.M. (Eds). Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology, and applications (1994), Kluwer, Boston
3. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., and Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2 (1978) 429-444
4. Despotis D.K. Improving the discriminating power of DEA: Focus on globally efficient units. Journal of the Operational Research Society 53 (2002) 314-323
5. Doyle J., and Green R. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and the uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society 45 (1994) 567-578
6. Dyson R.G., and Thannassoulis E. Reducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Operational Research Society 39 (1988) 563-576
7. Green R., Doyle J., and Cook W.D. Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research 90 (1996) 461-472
8. Nash J.F. The bargaining problem. Economica 5 (1950) 155-162
9. Oral M., Kettani O., and Lang P. A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects. Management Science 37 (1991) 871-885
10. Sexton T.R., Silkman R.H., and Hogan A.J. Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. In: Silkman R.H. (Ed). Measuring efficiency: An assessment of data envelopment analysis vol. 32 (1986), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 73-105
11. Wong Y.H., and Beasley J.E. Restricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 41 (1990) 829-835
12. Zilla S.S., and Lea F. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. European Journal of Operational Research 140 (2002) 249-256